Scheme 2
Table 2. Scope of Reaction with Ligand 2d
entry
R1
Ph
Me
n-Pent
i-Pr
R2
Me
n-Hex
Me
yield (%)
eea
1
2
3
4
67
71
69
79
87
88
84
85
Me
a Enantiomeric excess determined by chiral GC (CDGTA).
accomplish this would be the introduction of a second
sulfonamide, affording (potentially) tridentate phosphine bis-
(sulfonamide) ([NPN]) ligands.7 The synthesis of several
phosphine bis(sulfonamides) followed the iterative one-pot
procedure shown in Scheme 2. A primary phosphine was
deprotonated using n-BuLi, and the resulting lithium phos-
phide was treated with 1 equiv of an aziridine8 to give the
lithiated phosphine sulfonamide intermediate (1a-e). This
sequence was then repeated to append the second sulfon-
amide arm. Phosphine bis(sulfonamides) 2a-e were prepared
in this fashion and isolated as moderately air-sensitive
colorless oils or white solids.
performed significantly less well (entry 5), establishing the
superior performance of the triflamide group.
On the basis of these initial studies, ligand 2d was selected
for further study. Of particular interest was whether 2d would
provide consistent levels of enantioselectivity for conjugate
additions to a range of acyclic aliphatic enones (Table 2).
Further optimization revealed that the catalyst loading and
the amount of Et
2Zn could be significantly reduced. As
shown, under these optimized conditions ligand 2d consis-
tently provided enantioselectivities in the 84-88% ee range
for several aliphatic enones (entries 1-4).
With these new ligands 2a-e in hand, an initial screen of
their performance in the Cu(OTf)2-catalyzed conjugate
addition of Et2Zn to benzylidene acetone was performed
(Table 1). All reactions were carried out in Et2O at ambient
Although phosphine bis(sulfonamides) are potentially
tridentate ligands, it is unlikely that the species responsible
for catalysis would have all three donors of the [NPN] ligand
and the requisite alkyl residue bound to a single Cu center;
such a coordinatively and electronically saturated complex
would not be expected to be reactive. More likely is that
one of the sulfonamides is not associated with the Cu during
catalysis but rather performs a distinct function. We therefore
considered ligands bearing two different sulfonamide groups,
with the expectation that each of the sulfonamides could be
tuned to optimize its specific reaction role.
Treatment of lithium cyclohexylphosphide with the aziri-
dine derived from (S)-tert-leucinol and Tf2O gave phosphine
sulfonamide 3 as a mixture (1.3:1) of diastereomers in 88%
yield (Scheme 3). The second sulfonamide arm of the ligand
was installed under neutral conditions by reaction of 3 with
the aziridine derived from (S)-tert-leucinol and 3,5-bis-
(trifluoromethyl)bezenesulfonyl chloride (ArFSO2Cl) in CF3-
CH2OH at 70 °C. After treatment with BH3‚Me2S, the
diastereomeric phosphine-borane complexes 4a and 4b (dr
) 1.5:1.0) were separated and isolated as air-stable solids
(79% total yield).9 Deprotection of 4a and 4b with 1,4-
diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (DABCO) afforded P-chiral [NPN′]
ligands 5a and 5b in 84% and 76% yield, respectively.10
The performance of ligands 5a and 5b was then compared
in the Cu(OTf)2-catalyzed addition of Et2Zn to benzylidene
acetone (Scheme 4). In terms of enantioselectivity, ligand
Table 1. Performance of Ligands 2a-e
entry
ligand
R1
R2
R3
eea
1
2
3
4
5
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
Ph
Ph
Cy
Cy
Cy
i-Pr
t-Bu
i-Pr
t-Bu
t-Bu
Tf
Tf
Tf
Tf
Ts
48
12
79
84
67
a Enantiomeric excess determined by chiral GC (CDGTA).
temperature as these proved to be optimal conditions.
Reactions with phenylphosphine-derived ligands 2a and 2b
were sluggish and afforded the conjugate addition product
in poor to modest enantioselectivities (entries 1 and 2). In
contrast, the more basic cyclohexylphosphine-derived ligand
2c yielded a substantial improvement in enantioselectivity
(entry 3). A further substitution of tert-butyl for iso-propyl
on the ligand backbone (2d) resulted in an increase in
selectivity to 84% ee (entry 4). Finally, bis(tosylamide) 2e
(7) This is a new ligand class. For related [NPN] ligands, see: (a) Jiang,
Y.; Jiang, Q.; Zhu, G.; Zhang, X. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 6565-6568.
(b) Schrock, R. R.; Seidel, S. W.; Schrodi, Y.; Davis, W. M. Organome-
tallics 1999, 18, 428-437. (c) Fryzuk, M. D.; Johnson, S. A.; Rettig, S. J.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 11024-11025.
(8) Cernerud, M.; Skrinning, A.; Be´rge`re, I.; Moberg, C. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 1997, 8, 3437-3441.
(9) An X-ray crystallographic study of the minor diastereomer allowed
the assignment of relative configuration for 4a and 4b. See Supporting
Information.
(10) During the course of this work, Nelson reported the synthesis of an
amino bis(sulfonamide) ligand bearing identical differential substitution on
the two sulfonamide arms: Nelson, S. G.; Zhu, C.; Shen, X. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2004, 126, 14-15.
4118
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 22, 2004