hydrogens of the two inner phenyl substituents connected
to C15 and C16. The fact that two distinct signals were
observed for these ortho hydrogens suggests that the rate of
rotation of the two inner phenyl groups is relatively slow on
the NMR time scale at 25 °C. Two distinct signals attribut-
able to the meta hydrogens were also observed at δ 6.03
and 6.24. This is in sharp contrast to the 1H NMR spectrum
(600 MHz) of 2 at 25 °C, which showed only one signal
(doublet) at δ 6.52 for the ortho hydrogens and one signal
(triplet) at δ 7.00 for the meta hydrogens. However,
temperature-dependent NMR study of 2 showed that at -40
°C two doublets at δ 6.46 and 6.51 for the ortho hydrogens
and two triplets at δ 6.93 and 7.05 for the meta hydrogens
appeared, and the coalescence temperatures were determined
to be -22 and -10 °C, respectively, corresponding to
rotational barriers of 12.5 and 12.6 kcal/mol at these two
temperatures.
Scheme 2
Interestingly, signals from the ortho and meta hydrogens
of the two outer phenyl substituents connected to C1 and
C14 of 10 were conspicuously missing. Instead, broad humps
could be discerned on the baseline due to restricted rotation
of the phenyl groups. On lowering the temperature from +25
to -20 °C, additional peaks started to appear, and at -20
°C two doublets at δ 6.21 and 6.36 attributable to the ortho
hydrogens and two triplets at δ 6.46 and 6.73 attributable to
the meta hydrogens could be identified. The coalescence
temperatures for the ortho and meta hydrogens are 25 and
30 °C, respectively, corresponding to rotational barriers of
14.3 and 14.2 kcal/mol at these two temperatures. At 55 °C
on a 270 MHz NMR spectrometer, a single doublet at δ 6.29
for the ortho hydrogens and a single triplet at δ 6.58 for the
meta hydrogens could be clearly discerned.
allowing a minor portion of 14 to undergo the Myers-Saito
cyclization reaction.9 On the other hand, the use of the diyne
without a phenyl substituent on the central benzene ring
produced the corresponding benzo[b]fluorene exclusively in
90% yield.10
Compared to the synthesis of 2, the use of diyne 6 bearing
a phenyl substituent on the central benzene ring resulted in
a lower yield for 10. A model study with 13 revealed that
the expected benzo[b]fluorene 17 was produced via a
sequence of reactions involving a prototropic rearrangement
to form the benzannulated enyne-allene 14 followed by a
Schmittel cyclization reaction7 to form biradical 15, which
in turn underwent an intramolecular radical-radical coupling
and a prototropic rearrangement (Scheme 2). However, two
additional adducts, 18 and 19, were also produced. A
competing intramolecular [2 + 2] cycloaddition reaction of
14 could account for 18. The generation of biradical 16 from
the Myers-Saito cyclization reaction8 of 14 followed by
trapping the aryl radical center with the phenyl substituent
and a prototropic rearrangement could furnish 19. Presum-
ably, the emergence of nonbonded steric interactions between
the two phenyl substituents along the pathway toward 17
could be responsible for an increase of its activation energy,
Acknowledgment. K.K.W. thanks the Petroleum Re-
search Fund (38169-AC1), administered by the American
Chemical Society, and the National Science Foundation
(CHE-0414063) for financial support. J.L.P. acknowledges
the support (CHE-9120098) provided by the National Science
Foundation for the acquisition of a Siemens P4 X-ray
diffractometer. The financial support of the NSF-EPSCoR
(1002165R) for the purchase of a 600 MHz NMR spectrom-
eter is gratefully acknowledged.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental pro-
1
cedures, spectroscopic data, and H and 13C NMR spectra
of 4-6, 8-10, 12, 13, and 17-19; ORTEP drawings of the
crystal structures of 10 and 19; and X-ray crystallographic
data of 10 and 19 (CIF). This material is available free of
OL0481434
(9) (a) Engels, B.; Lennartz, C.; Hanrath, M.; Schmittel, M.; Strittmatter,
M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1960-1963. (b) Engels, B.; Hanrath,
M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 6356-6361. (c) Schreiner, P. R.; Prall,
M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 8615-8627. (d) Wenthold, P. G.; Lipton,
M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 9265-9270. (e) Cramer, C. J.; Kormos,
B. L.; Seierstad, M.; Sherer, E. C.; Winget, P. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1881-
1884.
(7) (a) Schmittel, M.; Strittmatter, M.; Kiau, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995,
36, 4975-4978. (b) Schmittel, M.; Strittmatter, M.; Vollmann, K.; Kiau,
S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 999-1002.
(8) (a) Myers, A. G.; Kuo, E. Y.; Finney, N. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989,
111, 8057-8059. (b) Myers, A. G.; Dragovich, P. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1989, 111, 9130-9132. (c) Nagata, R.; Yamanaka, H.; Okazaki, E.; Saito,
I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 4995-4998. (d) Nagata, R.; Yamanaka, H.;
Murahashi, E.; Saito, I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 2907-2910.
(10) Li, H.; Zhang, H.-R.; Petersen, J. L.; Wang, K. K. J. Org. Chem.
2001, 66, 6662-6668.
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 23, 2004
4357