As a consequence, simple synthetic procedures for their
synthesis are important,8 especially when the parent amino
acid is non-proteinogenic.
Scheme 1. Enantiopure δ-Lactols as Tools in Asymmetric
Synthesis
Scheme 2. Stereoselective Construction of
CamTHP*-Desymmetrized Glycinamide Building Block 3
2 only moderate to good diastereocontrol was observed and
the facial bias was electrophile dependent (Scheme 1).
Despite its ease of preparation, the use of 2 in the asymmetric
synthesis of R-amino carbonyl compounds could lead to
problems because of the selectivity issues. With this in mind,
we began investigating the potential utility of the camTHP*
glycinamide 3 for this purpose (Figure 1).
The camphor-derived δ-lactol 6 was readily prepared on
multigram scale in two high-yielding and scalable steps. First,
a diastereoselective allylation of commercially available (+)-
camphor 4 using allylmagnesium bromide9 afforded homoal-
lylic alcohol 5 in nearly quantitative (94%) yield. Treatment
of this material with [Rh(OAc)2]2 and Xantphos (4,5-bis-
(diphenylphosphino)-9,9-dimethylxanthine) under an atmo-
Figure 1. MeTHP*-desymmetrized glycinamide building block 2
and a sterically augmented analogue, camTHP* glycinamide 3, for
improved improved facial selection in metal enolate chemistry.
In this paper, we describe the large-scale synthesis of the
camphor-derived δ-lactol (camTHP*OH) 6, its function as
a stereodirecting group in enolate alkylation reactions of an
attached glycinamide residue, and the utility of the novel
building block 3 for the highly stereoselective synthesis of
R-amino carbonyl compounds.
The R-amino carbonyl unit is an ideal synthon for the
stereoselective synthesis of alkaloids,5 1,2-amino alcohols,6
and other amine-containing natural products,5 as well as
exhibiting interesting biological properties in its own right.7
(8) (a) Scho¨llkopf, U.; Groth, U.; Deng, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1981, 20, 798. (b) Pettig, D.; Scho¨llkopf, U. Synthesis 1988, 173. (c)
Williams, R. M.; Sinclair, P. J.; Zhai, D.; Chen, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988,
110, 1547. (d) Williams, R. M.; Im, M.-N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29,
6075. (e) Williams, R. M.; Im, M.-N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113,
9276. (f) Seebach, D.; Juaristi, E.; Miller, D. D.; Schickli, C.; Weber, T.
HelV. Chim. Acta 1987, 70, 237. (g) Fitzi, R.; Seebach, D. Tetrahedron
1988, 44, 5277. (h) Seebach, D.; Gees, T.; Schuler, F. Liebigs Ann. Chem.
1993, 785. (i) Studer, A.; Seebach, D. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1995, 217.
(j) Myers, A. G.; Gleason, J. L. Org. Synth. 1999, 76, 57. (k) Bull, S. D.;
Davies, S. G.; Epstein, S. W.; Leech M. A.; Ouzman, J. V. A. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1998, 2321. For reviews, see: (l) Duthaler, R. O.
Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 1539. (m) Hegedus, L. Acc. Chem. Res. 1995, 28,
299. (n) Bloch, R. Chem. ReV. 1998, 98, 1407. (o) Calmes, M.; Daunis, J.
Amino Acids 1999, 16, 215. (p) Ma, J.-A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003,
42, 4290.
(5) Coppola, G. M.; Schuster, H. F. Asymmetric SynthesissConstruction
of Chiral Molecules Using Amino Acids; Wiley-Interscience: New York,
1987.
(6) Fujita, M.; Hiyama, T. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 5415.
(7) Jung, M. J. In Chemistry and Biochemistry of the Amino Acids;
Barrett, G. C., Ed.; Chapman and Hall: London, 1985; p 227.
(9) Dimitrov, V.; Simova, S.; Kostova, K. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 1699.
4424
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 24, 2004