from ethereal reaction mixtures but was as well converted into 7a
and SbCl3 when the reaction proceeded.
Oxidative fragmentation was as well observed upon air oxidation
of 3a[AlCl4], and upon treatment of 2a with PCl5 to yield 7a, SbCl3,
and PCl3. This last reaction was completed by ring metathesis
of PCl3 with a second molecule of 2a to give the salt
[(CH)2(NtBu)2P][SbCl4] as isolable final product. The observed
reactivity of 2a towards SbCl5 and PCl5 is in marked contrast to
that of diazaphospholenes which react under identical conditions
exclusively via chloride abstraction and formation of diazapho-
spholenium salts12 that are stable in dry oxygen.
In conclusion, it has been shown that the mesomeric stabilisation
in the molecular framework of III is sufficient to allow the first
synthesis of cationic Sb-analogues of N-heterocyclic imidazoyl
carbenes, and that these species are distinguished from their lighter
homologues by increased Lewis-acidity and a significantly higher
lability to undergo unprecedented oxidation reactions under
cheletropic ring fragmentation.
Fig. 2 ORTEP style drawing of 3a[SbCl4] with thermal ellipsoids at the 50%
˚
probability level; H-atoms omitted for clarity. Selected bond lengths [A]:
Sb1–N1 2.025(2), Sb1–N2 2.023(2), N1–C1 1.356(3), N2–C2 1.353(3), C1–
C2 1.364(4), Sb2–Cl1 2.699(1), Sb2–Cl1# 3.054(1), Sb2–Cl2 2.517(1), Sb2–
Cl3 2.421(1), Sb(2)–Cl(4) 2.362(1), Sb1–Cl1 3.433(1).
known as viable access to phosphenium hexachloroantimonates,12
the corresponding reaction of 2a afforded, quite surprisingly, not the
salt 3a[SbCl6] but proceeded via fragmentation of the heterocycle to
give SbCl3 and the diazadiene 7a. The products were isolated as a
crystalline adduct of composition [(7a)(SbCl3)2] that was was
identified by a single-crystal X-ray diffraction study, but dissociated
according to 1H NMR studies into its constituents in solution.
The crystal structure of [(7a)(SbCl3)2] (Fig. 3) features two
Notes and references
{ Selected spectral data: 2a: 1H NMR (C6D6): d ~ 6.6 (2H, CH), 1.25
(18H, tBu); MS (EI, 16 eV, 150 uC): m/e (%) ~ 324 (85) (M1), 289 (85)
(M1 2 Cl). 2b: 1H NMR (C6D6): d ~ 6.79 (4H, m-H), 6.38 (2H, CH), 2.29
(12H, o-Me), 2.13 (6H, p-Me); MS (EI): m/z (%) ~ 448 (20) (M1), 413 (16)
(M1 2 Cl), 277 (100) (M1 2 SbCl, Me). 3a[SbCl4]: 1H NMR (CD3CN):
d ~ 8.57 (2H, CH), 1.71 (18H, tBu). 3b[SO3CF3]: 1H NMR (CD3CN): d ~
8.41 (2H, CH), 7.17 (4H, m-H), 2.40 (12H, o-Me), 2.20 (6H, p-Me).
§ Crystal data at 123 K: 2a: C10H20ClN2Sb, FW ~ 325.5, orthorhombic,
˚
pyramidal SbCl3-units with bond lengths of 2.38–2.40 A. The Sb1-
atom is chelated by the diazadiene nitrogen atoms to form a planar
˚
five-membered SbN2C2-ring. The Sb–N bonds are by some 0.4 A
longer than in 2a or 3a and the C–C and C–N bond lengths
represent normal single and double bonds, as expected for a
diazadiene. Both Sb-atoms exhibit secondary contacts with
˚
˚
˚
Pbca, a ~ 11.5242(5) A, b ~ 10.9946(4) A, c ~ 21.0980(9) A, V ~
3
2673.2(2) A , Z ~ 8; 13862 reflxns. collected (2344 unique), R1 ~ 0.038
˚
(I w 2s(I)), wR2 ~ 0.091. 3a[SbCl4]: C10H20Cl4N2Sb2, FW ~ 553.6,
monoclinic, P21/n, a ~ 10.1078(1) A, b ~ 19.5200(2) A, c ~ 10.2340(1) A,
b ~ 114.408(1)u, V ~ 1838.8(1) A , Z ~ 4; 16986 reflxns. collected (3213
unique), R1 ~ 0.018 (I w 2s(I)), wR2 ~ 0.042. 3a[SO3CF3]?CH2Cl2,
C12H22Cl2F3N2O3SSb, FW ~ 524.0, monoclinic, P21/c, a ~ 11.0192(1) A,
b ~ 10.3184(1) A, c ~ 18.6936(2) A, b ~ 104.138(1)u, V ~ 2061.1(1) A ,
Z ~ 4; 32263 reflxns. collected (3603 unique), R1 ~ 0.023 (I w 2s(I)),
wR2 ~ 0.061. [(7a)(SbCl3)2]: C10H20Cl6N2Sb2, FW ~ 624.5, monoclinic,
˚
3
˚
˚
˚
distances between 3.04 and 3.57 A to Cl-atoms of adjacent
SbCl3-units. Neglecting one weak interaction each (Sb–Cl w
3.50 A, see thin lines in Fig. 3), both Sb-atoms attain a coordination
˚
˚
˚
number of six (Sb1: 5 1 1; Sb2: 3 1 3) and a distorted octahedral
coordination geometry. If one adopts this view, the adduct [(7a)
(SbCl3)2] is formally described as a valence isomer of an ion pair
3a[SbCl6], with conversion between both forms being feasible by
simple shifts of electrons and bridging chlorides between Sb-atoms.
Computational studies (at the b3lyp/6-31g* level) on the model
compounds [(7c)(SbCl3)2] and 3c[SbCl6] (see Scheme 1, R = Me)
revealed that both species are local minima on the energy
hypersurface but that [(7c)(SbCl3)2] is – in the gas phase – by
34.4 kcal mol21 more stable than the ion pair 3c[SbCl6].
3
˚
˚
˚
˚
˚
˚
C2/c, a ~ 12.0617(1) A, b ~ 17.4255(2) A, c ~ 19.3913(2) A, b ~
˚
3
102.081(1)u, V ~ 3985.4(1) A , Z ~ 8; 34881 reflxns. collected (3512
unique), R1 ~ 0.018 (I w 2s(I)), wR2 ~ 0.041. CCDC reference numbers:
CCDC-242440 (2a), CCDC-242441 (3a[SbCl4]), CCDC-242443
(3a[SO3CF3]), CCDC-242442 ([(7a)(SbCl3)2]). See http://www.rsc.org/
suppdata/cc/b4/b409657f/ for crystallographic data in .cif or other
electronic format.
1 G. A. Olah, J. Org. Chem., 2001, 66, 5943; H. Gru¨tzmacher and
C. M. Marchand, Coord. Chem. Rev., 1997, 163, 287.
2 G. Boche, P. Andrews, K. Harms, M. Marsch, K. S. Rangappa,
M. Schimeczek and C. Willeke, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 4925.
3 A. H. Cowley and R. A. Kemp, Chem. Rev., 1985, 85, 367; D. Gudat,
Coord. Chem. Rev., 1997, 163, 71.
In line with these results, the outcome of the reaction of 2a with
SbCl5 is rationalised by assuming that the initial step involves
oxidative chlorination of 2a rather than Lewis-acid induced Sb–Cl
cleavage, to give a hypothetical intermediate 8a which then decays
via cheletropic fragmentation to the diazadiene 7a and SbCl3. This
proposition was supported by the trapping of SbCl3 by unreacted
2a to give 3a[SbCl4]. The salt precipitated as isolable side-product
4 J.B.Lambert,S.Zhang,C.L.SternandJ.C.Huffman,Science,1993,260,
1917.
5 J. B. Lambert and Y. Zhao, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1997, 36, 400.
6 A. Sekiguchi, T. Fukawa, V. Y. Lee, M. Nakamoto and M. Ichinohe,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 1143.
7 A. Sekiguchi, T. Fukawa, V. Y. Lee and M. Nakamoto, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2003, 125, 9250.
8 N. Burford, T. M. Parks, B. W. Royan, J. F. Richardson and P. S. White,
Can. J. Chem., 1992, 71, 703; N. Burford, C. L. B. Macdonald,
T. M. Parks, G. Wu, B. Borecka, W. Kiviatkowski and T. S. Cameron,
Can. J. Chem., 1996, 74, 2209.
9 M. Veith, B. Bertsch and V. Huch, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem., 1988, 559, 73.
10 C. J. Carmalt, V. Lomeli, B. G. McBurnett and A. H. Cowley, Chem.
Commun., 1997, 2095.
11 M. K. Denk, S. Gupta and A. J. Lough, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 1999, 41.
12 I. A. Litvinov, V. A. Naumov, T. V. Gryaznova, A. N. Pudovik and
A. M. Kibardin, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1990, 312, 623.
13 D. Gudat, A. Haghverdi, H. Hupfer and M. Nieger, Chem.–Eur. J.,
2000, 6, 3414.
Fig. 3 ORTEP style drawing of [(7a)(SbCl3)2] with thermal ellipsoids at the
50% probability level; H-atoms omitted for clarity; Sb2a, Cl1a, Cl2a, and
Cl4b denote atoms of neighboring molecular units. Selected bond lengths
14 T. Gans-Eichler, D. Gudat and M. Nieger, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002,
41, 1888.
˚
[A]: Sb1–N1 2.460(2), Sb1–N2 2.418(2), N1–C1 1.278(3), C2–N2 1.277(3),
C1–C2 1.472(3), Sb1–Cl1 2.384(1), Sb1–Cl2 2.546(1), Sb1–Cl3 2.596(1),
Sb1–Cl4 3.363(1), Cl1–Sb2a 3.334(1), Sb2–Cl2 3.196(1), Sb2–Cl3 3.041(1),
Sb2–Cl4 2.406(1), Sb2–Cl5 2.412(1), Sb2–Cl6 2.380(1).
15 M. Veith, B. Bertsch and V. Huch, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem., 1988, 559, 7.
16 U. Ensinger, W. Schwarz and A. Schmidt, Z. Naturforsch., Teil B, 1982,
37, 1584.
C h e m . C o m m u n . , 2 0 0 4 , 2 4 3 4 – 2 4 3 5
2 4 3 5