JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL RESEARCH 2007 495
O
H
N-R
H
N-R
H
O
O
O
OH
H
KMnO
MCPBA
4
OH
O
(3)
(4)
(2)
O
O
O
HC(OCH )
NaOCH ,CH OH
3 3
OCH3
3 3
OCH3
O2,TEMPO
CuCl
OCH3
O
OH
O
(5)
(6)
Scheme 1
(7)
sulfate which had crystallised out were separated off. The organic
phase was then steam-distilled and the cyclocitral was extracted from
the condensate (about 2.5l with diethyl ether (3 × 100 ml). The ether
solution was dried and the ether removed, leaving the cyclocitral
mixture 141.3 g. This corresponded to a yield of 90%, based on citral
employed. The isomer mixture was separated by fractional distillation
into pure 82 g α-cyclocitral (boiling point 39°C/0.4 mbar) and 51 g
pure β-cyclocitral (boiling point 52°C/0.2 mbar).
over night. The lower boiling substances were removed on a rotary
evaporator. The oil residue (5) 91 g was obtained. Crude oil 2 g was
purified by column chromatography (AcOEt:cyclohaxane = 4:6) for
analysis: IR(KBr) 2960(s), 1740(s), 1430(m), 1240(m), 1150(s) cm-1;
1H NMR(CDCl3) δ 0.90(3H, s), 0.95(3H, s), 1.39(3H, s), 1.7–2.0(4H,
m), 2.45(1H, s), 3.0(1H, t, J = 2 Hz), 3.72(3H,s). Anal. Calcd for
C11H18O3: C, 66.67; H, 9.09. Found: C, 66.70; H, 9.11%.
Methyl 3-hydroxy-2,6,6-trimethylcyclohex-ene-1-carboxylate (6):
To a stirred solution of sodium metal 10.0 g (0.43 mol) dissolved in
methanol (100 ml) was added dropwisely (5) 90.0 g in methanol
50 ml under a N2 atmosphere. The solution was refluxed for 6 h,
cooled to room temperature, and neutralised with 1NH2SO4, the
excess methanol was removed on a rotary evaporator, and the
aqueous residue was extracted with ethyl acetate (2 × 200 ml).
The combined organic layers were washed with aqueous saturated
NaCl solution (200 ml), dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and evaporated
to give (6) 87 g (96%), Crude oil 3 g was purified by column
chromatography AcOEt:cyclohaxane = 1:1) for analysis: IR(KBr)
3420(br), 2960(s), 1720(s), 1430(m), 1290(m) 1230(br), 1060(m),
1020(br), 900(m), 725(s) cm-1; 1H NMR(CDCl3) δ 1.05(3H, s),
1.10(3H, s), 1.2–2.1(4H, m), 1.78(3H, s), 2.2(1H, br s), 3.75(3H,
s), 4.2(1H, m). Anal. Calcd for C11H18O3: C, 66.67; H, 9.09. Found:
C, 66.72; H, 9.11%.
Methyl 3-oxo-2,6,6-trimethylcyclohex-1-ene-1-carboxylate (7):
To a stirred mixture of TEMPO 3.5 g (0.02 mol) and CuCl 2.0 g
(0.02 mol) in N,N-dimethyl formamide (150 ml) was added (6) 80 g. To
the above mixture, oxygen was bubbled for. 15 h at room temperature,
N,N-dimethyl formamide was then removed by distillation at reduced
pressure. To the residue was added dichloromethane (200 ml), and
the solid were removed by filtration, the filtrate was washed with
aqueous saturated NaCl solution (100 ml), the organic layers dried
with Na2SO4, filtered, and evaporated. The residue was then distilled
at reduced pressure to give 75 g(90%) of pure (7): b.p. 75°C (0.02
mm Hg). 1H NMR(CDCl3) δ 1.10(3H, s), 1.20(3H, s), 1.3–2.5(4H,m),
1.86(3H, s), 3.76(3H,s). GC-MS(EI, 70Ev): m/z(%) = 197 (M+ + H,
10), 196(M+, 100), 137(86). Anal. Calcd for C11H16O3: C, 67.32; H,
8.22. Found: C, 67.38; H, 8.02%.
α-Cyclocitral:1H NMR(CDCl3):δ1.1(3H, s), 1.32(3H, s), 1.7–2.1(4H,
m), 1.81(3H, s), 2.62(1H, s), 5.28(1H, s), 9.51(1H, s). GC-MS(EI,
70Ev): m/z(%) = 153 (M+ + H, 12), 152(M+, 100), 123(76). Anal. Calcd
for C10H16O: C, 78.95; H, 10.53. Found: C, 79.02; H, 10.55%.
2,6,6-Trimethylcyclohex-2-ene-1-carboxylic acid (3): To a solution
of α-cyclocitral (2) 152 g (1.0 mol) in 2-propanol 2.5l, potassium
carbonate 17 g (0.123 mol), and then potassium permanganate 17 g
(1.08 mol) in water (2.5l) were added in succession. The reaction
mixture was stirred for 5 h at room temperature. Then the solids were
removed by suction filtration and washed with water (2 × 50 ml). The
filtrate was concentrated on a rotary evaporator to approximately 2.5l
and extracted with ether (2 × 300 ml). The aqueous layer was acidified
to pH 2 with 1N HCl and extracted with ethyl acetate (4 × 500 ml).
The combined organic layers were dried over MgSO4, filtered, and
evaporated to give (3) as a yellow oil: 142.5 g (85%); crude oil 2 g
was purified by column chromatography (AcOEt: Cyclohexane:
AcOH = 10:10:1) for analysis; IR(KBr) 3450(br), 2960(s), 1725(s),
1608(s), 1510(s), 1360(m), 1250(br), 1040(m) cm-1; 1H NMR(CDCl3)
δ1.0(3H, s), 1.50(3H, s), 1.7–2.1(4H, m), 1.82(3H, s), 2.55(1H, s),
5.15(1H, s), 9.40(1H,br s). Anal. Calcd for C10H16O2: C, 71.43; H,
9.52. Found: C, 71.47; H, 9.53%.
2,3-Epoxy-2,6,6-trimethylcyclohexane-1-carboxylic acid (4a,b):
To a rapidly stirred solution of crude (3) 87 g (0.5 mol) from the
previous reaction in dichloromethane (1.5l) was added m-chloro-
peroxybenzoic acid (MCPBA) 105 g (0.60 mol) at 0°C. The solution
was kept between 0 and 5°C for 3 h. The solid was removed by
suction filtration and washed with dichloromethane (2 × 50 ml).
The filtrate was washed with aqueous saturated NaCl (1l), dried over
MgSO4, filtered, and evaporated to give 92 g (96%) of a mixture of
isomers 4a and 4b as a pale yellow oil .The crude oil 2 g was purified
by column chromatography (AcOEt:cyclohexane:AcOH = 10:10:1)
for analysis: IR(KBr) 3450(br), 2960(s), 1725(s), 1370(m), 1250(br),
Conclusions
We have designed an improved process for the synthesis
of the target compound (7) from the starting material of
citral without the need to remove three carbon atoms from
a-ionone as described in Dee Brook’s route. Every step was
modified to be more simple and gave high yields. The present
procedure is more effective and competitive, and is suitable
for large scale production.
1
1040(m) cm-1; H NMR(CDCl3) δ 0.95(3H, s),1.0(3H, s), 1.50(3H,
s), 1.7–2.1(4H, m), 2.55(1H, s), 3.15(1H, t, J = 2 Hz), 9.40(1H, br
s). Anal. Calcd for C10H16O3: C, 65.22; H, 8.70. Found: C, 65.27; H,
8.77%.
Methyl 2,3-epoxy-2,6,6-trimethylcyclohexane-1-carboxylate (5):
Crude (4a,b) 92 g, trimethyl orthoformate 64 g and p-toluenesulfonic
acid 0.5 g was mixed. The mixture was stirred at room temperature
PAPER: 07/4742