Total synthesis of Perhydrohistrionicotoxin
SCHEME 2
Deprotonation of 1,3-dithiane in THF with butyllithium
at -10 °C for 2 h, followed by addition of 9 resulted in
clean alkylation after 24 h of stirring from -40 °C to room
temperature. A second equivalent of butyllithium was
added and the reaction mixture stirred at -10 °C for 3 h
to effect deprotonation. Addition of a further 1.2 equiv
of 9, followed by stirring for a further 24 h from -40 °C
to room temperature, resulted in a complex mixture of
products, which included some monoalkylated dithiane
(which is green by vanillin-based TLC development),
excess 9 (red), and dialkylated dithiane 10 (dark brown).
The dialkylated product was isolated in a moderate 54%
yield after purification. We surmised that the second
alkylation was being hindered by the formation of some
sort of aggregate or chelate, possibly of the structure 11,
which was reducing the reactivity of the lithiated
monoalkylated dithiane. This was backed up by the lack
of acceleration, or enhancement in yield, in the second
alkylation seen by changing the halogen leaving group
of 9 to bromide or iodide. Thus, a number of deaggrega-
tion strategies were investigated, including the use of
Lipshutz sodium tert-butoxide protocol12 and addition of
DMPU, TMEDA, and HMPA to the reaction mixture. The
most successful of these methods was the addition of 2
equiv of HMPA after the second deprotonation and before
the second addition of 9. The reaction mixture was seen
to turn dark red some 10-15 min after the addition of
HMPA, which also suggests that complexes are being
broken up or at least changed in nature. The yield of the
reaction in the presence of HMPA was 70%, an average
of 83.7% for each alkylation, and thus this method was
adopted. The two dioxolane groups of 10 were hydrolyzed
selectively over the dithiane group by 2 M aqueous
hydrochloric acid in THF to give dialdehyde 12 in near
quantitative yield. We evaluated two procedures for the
conversion of dialdehyde 12 into the Z,Z′-di-R,â-unsatur-
ated nitrile 8. Yamamoto’s modification of the Peterson
reaction of trimethylsilylacetonitrile13 gave good yields
(up to 73%) and up to 12:1 Z,Z′:Z,E′ ratios of the alkene
geometry but was found to be unpredictable, with some
reactions being high yielding and others less so. Zhang’s
nitrile modification14 of Ando’s protocol15 for the formation
of Z-R,â-unsaturated esters gave much more reliable
yields and equally good stereoselectivity (12:1 Z,Z′:Z,E′)
and was thus the method of choice. Conversion of the
dithiane 8 to the ketone 13 was achieved in 77% yield
by treatment with N-chlorosuccinimide and silver nitrate
in aqueous acetonitrile.16
Resu lts a n d Discu ssion
Our first objective was to doubly alkylate 1,3-dithiane
with two suitable four-carbon pieces, which would have
suitable functionality to be converted to dialdehyde 12
(Scheme 2). The commercially available 1-(3-chloropro-
pyl)-dioxolane11 9 was chosen as this four-carbon unit.
(4) For syntheses not covered by reviews, see: (a) Diedrichs, N.;
Krelaus, R.; Gedrath, I.; Westermann, B, Can. J . Chem. 2002, 80, 686.
(b) Davison, E. C.; Fox, M. E.; Holmes, A. B.; Roughley, S. D.; Smith,
C. J .; Williams, G. M.; Davies, J . E.; Raithby, P. R.; Adams, J . P.;
Forbes, I. T.; Press, N. J .; Thompson, M. J . J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
1 2002, 1494. (c) Williams, G. M.; Roughley, S. D.; Davies, J . E.;
Holmes, A. B. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 4900. (d) Stork, G.; Zhao,
K. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 5875. (e) Luzzio, F. A.; Fitch, R. W.
J . Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 5485. (f) Tanner, D.; Hagberg, L.; Poulsen, A.
Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 1427. (g) Comins, D. L.; Zhang, Y.; Zheng, X.
Chem. Commun. 1998, 2509. (h) Tanner, D.; Hagberg, L. Tetrahedron
1998, 54, 7907. (i) Kim, D.; Hong, S. W.; Park, C. W. Chem. Commun.
1997, 2263. (j) Compain, P.; Gore, J .; Vatele, J . M. Tetrahedron Lett.
1995, 36, 4063. (k) Maezaki, N.; Fukuyama, H.; Yagi, S.; Tanaka, T.;
Iwata, C. J . Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1994, 1835. (l) Zhu, J .; Royer,
J .; Quirion, J .-C.; Husson, H.-P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 2485. (m)
Winkler, J . D.; Hershberger, P. M. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 4852.
For synthetic approaches, see: (n) Malassene, R.; Vanquelef, E.;
Toupet, L.; Hurvois, J . P.; Moinet, C. Org. Biol. Chem. 2003, 1, 547.
(o) Comins, D. L.; Zheng, X. J . Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1994, 2681.
(p) Parsons, P. J .; Angell, R.; Naylor, A.; Tyrell, E. J . Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1993, 366. (q) Thompson, C. M. Heterocycles 1992, 34, 979.
(r) Venit, J . J .; DiPierro, M.; Magnus, P. J . Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 4298.
(5) (a) Magnuson, S. R. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 2167. (b) Poss, C. S.;
Schreiber, S. L. Acc. Chem. Res. 1994, 27, 9.
With ketone 13 in hand, we were now set to carry out
the oxime formation. Stirring 13 with 1.2 equiv of
hydroxylamine hydrochloride and 2 equiv of sodium
acetate in methanol for 24 h gave a single new product
(6) Bunce, R. A. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 13103.
(7) Part 2 of this series: Rejzek, M.; Stockman, R. A. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2002, 43, 6505.
(8) Communcication on formal syntheses: Stockman, R. A. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 2000, 41, 9163.
(9) (a) Grigg, R.; Markandu, J .; Surendrakumar, S.; Thornton-Pett,
M.; Warnock, W. J . Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 10399. (b) Grigg, R.;
Markandu, J .; Perrior, T.; Surendrakumar, S.; Warnock, W. J . Tetra-
hedron 1992, 48, 6929. (c) Grigg, R.; Dorrity, M. J .; Heaney, F.; Malone,
J . F.; Rajviroongit, S.; Sridharan, V.; Surendrakumar, S. Tetrahedron
1991, 47, 8297. (d) Grigg, R.; Heaney, F.; Markandu, J .; Surendraku-
mar, S.; Thornton-Pett, M.; Warnock, W. J . Tetrahedron 1991, 47, 4007.
(e) Armstrong, P.; Grigg, R.; Heaney, F.; Surerndrakumar, S.; Warnock,
W. J . Tetrahedron 1991, 47, 4495. (f) Grigg, R.; Heaney, F.; Suren-
drakumar, S.; Warnock, W. J . Tetrahedron 1991, 47, 4477. (g) Grigg,
R.; J ordan, M.; Tangthongkum, A.; Einstein, F. W. B.; J ones, T. J .
Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1984, 47.
(11) Purchased from Fluka. Alternatively, a two-step synthesis has
been published: Li, S.; Kosemura, S.; Yamamura, S. Tetrahedron 1998,
54, 6661.
(12) Lipshutz, B. H.; Garcia, E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 7261.
(13) (a) Haruta, R.; Ishiguro, M.; Furuta, K.; Mori, A.; Ikeda, N.;
Yamamoto, H. Chem. Lett. 1982, 1093. (b) Furata, K.; Ishiguro, M.;
Haruta, R.; Ikeda, N.; Yamamoto, H. Bull. Chem. Soc. J pn. 1984, 57,
2768. (c) Yamakado, Y.; Ishiguro, M.; Ikeda, N.; Yamamoto, H. J . Am.
Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 5568.
(14) Zhang, T. Y.; O’Toole, J . C.; Dunigan, J . M. Tetrahedron Lett.
1998, 39, 1461.
(15) Ando, K. Tetrahedon Lett. 1995, 24, 4105.
(16) Corey, E. J .; Erickson, B. W. J . Org. Chem. 1971, 36, 3553.
(17) Fletcher, D. A.; McMeeking, R. F.; Parkin, D. J . Chem. Inf.
Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 746.
(10) For other approaches to histrionicotoxin utilizing nitrone cy-
cloadditions see refs 4b,c,o and 9: Tufariello, J . J .; Trybulski, E. J . J .
Org. Chem. 1974, 39, 3378. Go¨ssinger, E.; Imhof, R.; Wehrli, H. Helv.
Chim. Acta 1975, 58, 96.
J . Org. Chem, Vol. 69, No. 5, 2004 1599