Table 1 Association constants (log K11 and log K12) for a halide
anion in MeCN containing 1% H2O
Physiol. Rev., 2000, 80, 853–924; (d) M. Brini and E. Carafoli,
Physiol. Rev., 2009, 89, 1341–1378.
2 (a) J.-M. Lehn, Supramolecular Chemistry: Concepts and
Perspectives, VCH, Weinheim, 1995; (b) T. Nabeshima, Coord.
Chem. Rev., 1996, 148, 151; (c) T. Nabeshima and S. Akine, Chem.
Rec., 2008, 8, 240; (d) T. Nabeshima, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 2010,
83, 969–991.
3 (a) E. Arunkumar, A. Ajayaghosh and J. Daub, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2005, 127, 3156–3164; (b) T. Morozumi, H. Hiraga and
H. Nakamura, Chem. Lett., 2003, 32, 146–147; (c) S. Akine,
T. Taniguchi, T. Saiki and T. Nabeshima, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2005, 127, 540–541; (d) Y. Li and C. M. Yang, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2005, 127, 3527–3530; (e) S. Akine, T. Taniguchi and
T. Nabeshima, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 15765–15774.
4 (a) C. Piguet, G. Bernardinelli and G. Hopfgartner, Chem. Rev.,
1997, 97, 2005–2062; (b) D. J. Hill, M. J. Mio, R. B. Prince,
T. S. Hughes and J. S. Moore, Chem. Rev., 2001, 101, 3893–4011;
(c) E. Yashima, K. Maeda, H. Iida, Y. Furusho and K. Nagai,
Chem. Rev., 2009, 109, 6102–6211.
Clꢁ
Brꢁ
Iꢁ
—
c
c
1
3.26(4)a
—
5.5(1),a 3.73(6)b
1ꢀCa2+
6.0(2),a 4.06(8)b
5.50(8),a 3.1(2)b
a
b
c
log K11 (Mꢁ1). log K12 (Mꢁ1). Not determined due to too small
spectral change.
of the mixture of 1ꢀCa2+ and Clꢁ.18 The CD spectra of 1ꢀCa2+
were also changed by the addition of Clꢁ accompanied by a
bathochromic shift of lmax (Fig. 4b). The change in the Cotton
effect indicates that the conformational change in the foldamer
was induced by the anion. In contrast, the CD spectra of 1
showed little change upon titration with Clꢁ ions (Fig. 4a). These
facts suggest that the folded structure of 1ꢀCa2+ is important for
the CD changes. Thus, the formation of the chiral foldamer
enabled Clꢁ ion detection by UV-vis and CD spectral changes.
The CD spectral titration of 1ꢀCa2+ with a Clꢁ ion and a
Job’s plot (Fig. 4c and d) clearly showed the 1 : 2 association.
Although the binding strength was not accurately estimated
due to the multi-stepwise equilibrium and the very strong
affinity for Clꢁ, the first and the second association constants,
log K11 and log K12 (Mꢁ1) for 1ꢀCa2+, are >7. These values
are over 500 times larger than that of 1 (log K11 = 4.27(2)).
The most reasonable explanation for the affinity enhancement
is that the association with Clꢁ was reinforced by electrostatic
interaction with the Ca2+ ion.12 The contact of the anion with
the cation generally enhanced the association constants as seen
in ion pair recognition.19 To quantitatively estimate the anion
affinity, the titration was performed in MeCN containing 1%
H2O because H2O, a solvent competitive with hydrogen
bonding, should decrease the binding affinity. The log K11
values were determined through nonlinear least-squares curve
fitting of the titration isotherms. The log K11 value of 1 is
3.26(4) for the Clꢁ ion (Table 1). Spectral changes for Brꢁ and
Iꢁ ions were too small to determine the log K11. Conversely,
1ꢀCa2+ exhibited the two-step binding to anions with
association constants, K11 and K12. The K11 value for Clꢁ is
500 times larger than the K11 value of 1. In Brꢁ and Iꢁ, the
association constants are smaller than in Clꢁ. The enhancement
of the anion affinity and the large spectral change triggered by
Ca2+ ions facilitated the halide ion detection.
5 (a) J. Rebek Jr., Acc. Chem. Res., 1984, 17, 258–264;
(b) J. P. Schneider and J. W. Kelly, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995,
117, 2533–2546; (c) A. Petitjean, R. G. Khoury, N. Kyritsakas and
J.-M. Lehn, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 6637–6647.
6 (a) H. Nishiyama, H. Sakahuchi, T. Nakamura, M. Horihata,
M. Kondo and K. Itoh, Organometallics, 1989, 8, 846–848;
(b) H. Nishiyama and K. Itoh, in Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis,
ed. I. Ojima, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2000, p. 111; (c) G. Desimoni,
G. Faita and P. Quadrelli, Chem. Rev., 2003, 103, 3119–3154.
7 (a) T. Tsubogo, Y. Yamashita and S. Kobayashi, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 9117–9120; (b) T. Poisson, Y. Yamashita and
S. Kobayashi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 7890–7892.
8 (a) K. Sada, T. Sugimoto, T. Tani, Y. Tateishi, T. Yi, S. Shinkai,
H. Maeda, N. Tohnai and M. Miyata, Chem. Lett., 2003, 32,
758–759; (b) T. Sugimoto, K. Sada, S. Sakamoto, K. Yamaguchi
and S. Shinkai, Chem. Commun., 2004, 1226–1227;
(c) T. Sugimoto, K. Sada, Y. Tateishi, T. Suzuki, Y. Sei,
K. Yamaguchi and S. Shinkai, Tetrahedron Lett., 2005, 46,
5347–5350; (d) T. Sugimoto, T. Suzuki, S. Shinkai and K. Sada,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 270–271.
9 T. Moriuchi, X. Shen and T. Hirao, Tetrahedron, 2006, 62,
12237–12246.
10 The crystallographic data: C34H46N6O12Cl2Ca, monoclinic, P21,
a = 17.061(6), b = 11.823(4), c = 21.703(7) A, b = 109.419(4)1,
V = 4129(2) A3, MW = 841.75, Z = 4, Dcalc = 1.354 g cmꢁ3
,
22 542 measured, 15 952 independent, GOF = 1.026, R1[I > 2s(I)]
= 0.0622, wR2(all data) = 0.1550, CCDC 805519.
11 Geometries were optimized using PBE1PBE functional and
6-31G(d,p) basis set.
12 V. Amendola, D. E. Go
E. Monzani and F. Sancenon, Inorg. Chem., 2005, 44, 8690–8698.
13 M. Boiocchi, L. D. Boca, D. E. Gomez, L. Fabbrizzi, M. Licchelli
´
mez, L. Fabbrizzi, M. Licchelli,
´
´
and E. Monzani, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 16507–16514.
14 H. Sato, Y. Suzuki, Y. Takai, H. Kawasaki, R. Arakawa and
M. Shizuma, Chem. Lett., 2010, 39, 564–566.
15 E. R. Sanchez, M. C. Gessel, T. L. Groy and M. T. Caudle, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 1933–1940.
In summary, we described the Ca2+-induced folding
behavior of the Pybox-based ditopic receptor 1, in which the
coordination of the urea oxygens to Ca2+ was involved. The
1ꢀCa2+ foldamer showed the UV-vis and CD spectral changes
responsive to the halide anions. A chiral information transfer
by guest-response of the chiral foldamer is now under
investigation.
16 M. Klessinger and J. Michl, Excited States and Photochemistry of
Organic Molecules, VCH, New York, 1995, pp. 139–178.
17 TD-DFT calculations were performed using
a two-layered
ONIOM method, where two nitrophenyl units were treated with
high level theory, PBE1PBE/6-311++G (d,p), and the rest were
treated with low level theory, PBE1PBE/6-31G(d,p). An ONIOM
method: S. Dapprich, I. Komaromi, K. S. Byun, K. Morokuma
and M. J. Frisch, J. Mol. Struct., 1999, 462, 1–21.
This study was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific
Research from MEXT of Japan.
18 A counter ion seriously often affects the binding properties of such a
ditopic receptor, but the addition of Bu4N+ClO4 to 1 and 1ꢀCa2+
ꢁ
resulted in no shift in the dH of the N–H proton, meaning that the
hydrogen-bonding interaction of N–H with a counter ClO4 anion
ꢁ
did not disturb the anion binding of the urea units. See ESIz.
19 (a) G. J. Kirkovits, J. A. Shriver, P. A. Gale and J. L. Sessler,
J. Inclusion Phenom. Macrocyclic Chem., 2001, 41, 69–75 and
references cited therein; (b) J. M. Mahoney, K. A. Stucker,
H. Jiang, I. Carmichael, N. R. Brinkmann, A. M. Beatty,
B. C. Noll and B. D. Smith, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127,
2922–2928.
Notes and references
1 (a) R. R. Crichton, in Biological Inorganic Chemistry:
An Introduction, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2008, ch. 11, pp. 183–196;
(b) A. J. Doig, in Protein Folding, Misfolding and Aggregation, ed.
V. Munoz, Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, 2008, ch. 1,
pp. 1–21; (c) A. M. Gordon, E. Homsher and M. Regnier,
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 6801–6803 6803