Scheme 5 Reagents and conditions: i, TBDPSCl, imidazole, DMAP,
CH2Cl2, 93%; ii, DIBALH, CH2Cl2, 220 uC, 61%; iii, TPAP (cat),
˚
NMO, 4 A mol. sieves, CH2Cl2; iv, NaClO2, KH2PO4, H2O2, MeCN–
H2O; v, DCC, BrCCl3, 2-mercaptopyridine-N-oxide, hn, 0 uC, 52% from
24; vi, t-BuLi, CuI.PBu3, O2, 278 uC, 75% (ref. 3c).
Scheme 3 Reagents and conditions: i, LiAlH4, THF; Bu3SnOTf, 0 uC A rt,
83%; ii, 5, PdCl2(MeCN)2, NMP; iii, MsCl, LiCl, collidine, DMF, 0 uC A
rt; iv, LiSnBu3, THF, 278 uC, 78% from 15; v, TBAF, THF, Et3N, 72%;
vi, Tf2O, collidine, CH2Cl2, Et3N, 278 uC, 99%.
(Scheme 5). Oxidation of 24 to the corresponding carboxylic acid
and brominative decarboxylation under photolytic conditions
afforded the bromobicyclopropane 25. Falck has shown that
copper catalyzed homocoupling of 25 yields a quatercyclopropane
26 which has been elaborated to FR-900848.3c
In summary, we have shown there is a pathway in the solvolytic
displacement of homoallylic triflates which can be used in a cascade
process to generate the trans,syn,trans configuration of
a
contiguous bicyclopropane. The method produces differentiated
terminal functional groups, a feature which lends itself to the
synthesis of polycyclopropane motifs in natural products such as
FR-900848.
Financial support was provided by the National Science
Foundation (0413994-CHE).
Notes and references
{ Crystal data for 22 (C19H32O4, M ~ 324.45): T ~ 100 K, monoclinic,
Scheme 4 Reagents and conditions: i, K2OsO4?H2O, NaIO4, THF–H2O; ii,
NaBH4, THF–H2O; iii, (2)-menthyl chloroformate, MeCN, pyridine; iv,
H2, Pd(OH)2/C, EtOH, 45% (four steps); v, 3,5-dinitrobenzoyl chloride,
pyridine, CH2Cl2; vi, C6H5CO2Na, MeOH–H2O, 8% (five steps).
˚
unit cell dimensions a ~ 9.2830(7), b ~ 5.5489(5), c ~ 18.4252(14) A, b ~
3
90.844(6)u, V ~ 948.99(13) A , P21 (#4), Z ~ 2, m ~ 0.621 mm21. Rigaku/
˚
MSC Rapid, CuKa radiation: 6021 reflections measured in the range
4.76 v h/u v 59.99, of which 2220 unique (Rint ~ 0.0895). Final
refinement of 219 parameters against this data set including 8 additional
restraints yielded R1 ~ 0.0818 (all data), wR2 ~ 0.1972 (all data). For 23
(C26H34N2O9, M ~ 518.55): T ~ 100 K, orthorhombic, unit cell
In order to determine the configuration of the major isomer 18,
the mixture produced from 17 was oxidized with potassium osmate
and sodium periodate and the resultant aldehydes were reduced to
primary alcohols 20 and 21 (Scheme 4). These alcohols were
reacted with (2)-menthyl chloroformate and the trityl group was
removed by hydrogenolysis to give a mixture from which the major
stereoisomer was separated by chromatography and crystallized.
This compound was shown by X-ray crystallographic analysis{ to
possess the relative configuration of trans,syn,trans-bicyclopropane
22, the absolute configuration being defined by the configuration of
(2)-menthol.
One of the two minor stereoisomers was found to have the
trans,anti,cis configuration of 21 by its transformation to the 3,5-
dinitrobenzoate derivative 23 which also yielded to X-ray crystal-
lographic analysis.{ The bicyclopropanes from which 22 and 23
originate are therefore 18 and 19, respectively, and our results
confirm that in each case inversion took place at the hydroxyl-
bearing carbon of 17 as the first cyclopropane was formed.
Formation of the second cyclopropane, if it is in concert with the
first, should lead to 18, but the presence of 19 suggests the cascade
process is partially interrupted at a monocyclopropylcarbinyl
cation with consequent loss of stereocontrol in the second
cyclization event. The third stereoisomeric bicyclopropane from
17 was also obtained in pure form as its 3,5-dinitrobenzoate and
has been tentatively identified as the trans,syn,cis isomer.
˚
dimensions a ~ 7.5080(3), b ~ 8.6340(3), c ~ 40.4790(15) A, V ~
2624.01(17) A , P212121 (#19), Z ~ 4, m ~ 0.834 mm21. Rigaku/MSC
3
˚
Rapid, CuKa radiation: 27905 reflections measured in the range
2.18 v h/u v 71.31, of which 3925 unique (Rint ~ 0.015). Final
refinement of 337 parameters against this data set yielded R1 ~ 0.0483 (all
data), wR2 ~ 0.1190 (all data). CCDC 249269–242970. See http://
other electronic format.
1 L. A. Wessjohann, W. Brandt and T. Thiemann, Chem. Rev., 2003, 103,
1625–1647.
2 (a) J. D. White and M. S. Jensen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 2970–
2971; (b) J. D. White and M. S. Jensen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117,
6224–6233.
3 (a) M. Yoshida, M. Ezaki, M. Hashimoto, M. Yamashita,
N. Shigematsu, M. Okuhara, M. Kohsaka and K. Horikoshi,
J. Antibiot., 1990, 43, 748–754; (b) A. G. M. Barrett, K. Kasdorf,
G. J. Tustin and D. J. Williams, Chem. Commun., 1995, 1143–1144;
(c) J. R. Falck, B. Mekonnen, J. Yu and J.-Y. Lai, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1996, 118, 6096–6097; (d) A. G. M. Barrett and K. Kasdorf, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 11030–11037.
4 R. E. Taylor, F. C. Engelhardt and M. J. Schmitt, Tetrahedron, 2003, 59,
5623–5634 and references therein.
5 E. J. Soloski, F. E. Ford and C. Tamborski, J. Org. Chem., 1963, 28,
237–239.
The utility of this bicyclopropane synthesis was demonstrated by
the conversion of 22 to an intermediate employed by Falck in his
synthesis of FR-900848.3c Thus, protection of alcohol 22 was
followed by reduction of the menthyl carbonate to yield alcohol 24
6 S. Saito, T. Hasegawa, M. Inaba, R. Nishida, T. Fujii, S. Nomizu and
T. Moritake, Chem. Lett., 1984, 1389–1392.
7 W. C. Still and C. Gennari, Tetrahedron Lett., 1983, 24, 4405–4408.
8 E. J. Corey and T. M. Eckrich, Tetrahedron Lett., 1984, 25, 2415–2418.
C h e m . C o m m u n . , 2 0 0 4 , 2 8 4 6 – 2 8 4 7
2 8 4 7