Phosphorus-Bridged [1.1]Ferrocenophane
Organometallics, Vol. 24, No. 5, 2005 991
Table 1. Molecular Structures Determined by
X-ray Analysis for ERn-Bridged
[1.1]Ferrocenophanes
Scheme 1
bridging group
E-Cp length
conformation average (Å)
E
R1
R2
ref
C
H or dO
H or non
H
syn
1.50, 1.47
1.504
1.509
1.513
1.509
1.651
1.823
1.860
1.829
1.848
1.9449
1.963b
1.933
2.136
2.142
2.146
4a
C
C
C
C
H
H
H
H
syn
4f
Me
syn
syn
anti
syn
anti
anti
anti
anti
anti
anti
anti
anti
anti
anti
4c
Results and Discussion
Me
4h
4e
5
Me
B- Me
Me
Isolation of [1.1]Ferrocenophane. Phosphorus-
bridged [1]ferrocenophane is known to undergo a ring-
opening reaction driven by its highly strained ring
structure.11,12 We have previously reported that the
UV-vis irradiation of PhP-bridged [1]ferrocenophane,
1, induces a ring-opening reaction to give dimer 2 as
well as polymeric products, as shown in Scheme 1.10
Before the direct separation of 2 from the polymeric
products, the phosphorus centers were sulfurized by a
reaction with elemental sulfur in order to prevent
oxidation by air. The subsequent separation using silica
gel column chromatography afforded yellow and orange
dimers 3 in ca. 9% yield each. The X-ray structure of
the former yellow dimer is shown in Figure 2, where
two ferrocene units are linked through phosphorus
atoms to form a [1.1]ferrocenophane framework with a
centric symmetry. The two phosphorus bridging groups
are arranged in an anti-disposition, with two phenyl
groups located at exo-positions. The main structural
features of a [1.1]ferrocenophane molecule are usually
given by four essential angles: twist, rotation, tilt, and
bridge angles (see Figure 3).4c The small tilt angle of
2.91(7)° for anti-3 indicates that each ferrocene unit
consists of almost parallel Cp rings. The twist angle also
has a small value of 2.91(7)°, which is exactly the same
as the tilt angle due to the centric symmetry, thereby
P
Men
Men
Me
9
Si Me
Si Cl
Si Me
Ga Me
Ga Me
7c, 7d
7b
7a
6a
6a
6b
8b
8a
8a
Cl
CC-R
non
basea
Ga CH(SiMe3)2 non
Sn n-Bu
Sn t-Bu
Sn Mes
n-Bu
t-Bu
Mes
a Base: ether, pyridine, pyrimidine, quinoxaline, pyridine, and
dioxane. b An average value of all base adducts.
anti isomer is rigid and not able to relieve that repul-
sion, while the syn isomer is flexible and can easily twist
to relieve it. The other is the repulsion between the two
ERn groups, which is conceivable only in the syn isomer.
To take a CH2-bridged complex in Table 1 as an
example, the former repulsion in the anti isomer is
substantial because the two CH2 bridges form very short
Cp-ERn bonds, leading to a close approach of the R-
and R′-hydrogens. In contrast, the latter repulsion in
the corresponding syn isomer is subtle because it is
practically between the hydrogen atoms of the CH2
bridges. Therefore, the syn-conformation is preferable
for the CH2-bridged complex, as is actually the case
(Table 1). An example that exhibits the opposite prefer-
ence is an SnBu2-bridged complex, in which the SnBu2
bridges form fairly long Cp-ERn bonds and have bulky
butyl groups (see Table 1).
On the basis of the above perspective, a PR-bridged
complex is in a delicate situation because the Cp-P
bond length (ca. 1.80-1.84 Å) is in a range where the
syn-anti preference is switched, as shown in Table 1.
Brunner et al. have reported PMen-bridged [1.1]ferro-
cenophane (Men ) menthyl) adopting an anti-conforma-
tion, but they did not mention its relative stability in
comparison with the corresponding syn isomer, nor did
they try to prepare the syn isomer.9 However, the syn
isomer of phosphorus-bridged [1.1]ferrocenophane is
worth preparing because it can be utilized as a novel
bidentate chelate, which has two phosphorus donor
atoms that are doubly bridged by the two ferrocene
units, and thus can be expected to serve as a novel
supporting ligand for metal-catalyzed transformations.
(11) (a) Butler, I. R.; Cullen, W. R.; Einstein, F. W. B.; Rettig, S. J.;
Willis, A. J. Organometallics 1983, 2, 128-135. (b) Seyferth, D.;
Withers, H. P., Jr. Organometallics 1982, 1, 1275-1282. (c) Withers,
H. P., Jr.; Seyferth, D.; Fellmann, J. D.; Garrou, P. E.; Martin, S.
Organometallics 1982, 1, 1283-1288. (d) Osborne, A. G.; Whiteley, R.
H.; Meads, R. E. J. Organomet. Chem. 1980, 193, 345-357. (e) Stoeckli-
Evans, H.; Osborne, A. G.; Whiteley, R. H. J. Organomet. Chem. 1980,
194, 91-101.
(12) For example, see: (a) Hierso, J.-C.; Lacassin, F.; Broussier, R.;
Amardeil, R.; Meunier, P. J. Organomet. Chem. 2004, 689, 766-769.
(b) Paquet, C.; Cyr, P. W.; Kumacheva, E.; Manners, I. Chem. Commun.
2004, 234-235. (c) Mizuta, T.; Onishi, M.; Nakazono, T.; Nakazawa,
H.; Miyoshi, K. Organometallics 2002, 21, 717-726. (d) Wang, X. S.;
Winnik, M. A.; Manners, I. Macromolecules 2002, 35, 9146-9150. (e)
Cao, L.; Massey, J. A.; Peckham, T. J.; Winnik, M. A.; Manners, I.
Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2001, 202, 2947-2953. (f) Stepnicka, P.; Base,
T. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2001, 4, 682-687. (g) Cao, L.; Manners, I.;
Winnik, M. A. Macromolecules 2001, 34, 3353-3360. (h) Evans, C. E.
B.; Lough, A. J.; Grondey, H.; Manners, I. New J. Chem. 2000, 24,
447-453. (i) Cao, L.; Winnik, M. A.; Manners, I. J. Inorg. Organomet.
Polym. 1998, 8, 215-224. (j) Herberhold, M.; Hertel, F.; Milius, W.;
Wrackmeyer, B. J. Organomet. Chem. 1999, 582, 352-357. (k) Peck-
ham, T. J.; Massey, J. A.; Honeyman, C. H.; Manners, I. Macromol-
ecules 1999, 32, 2830-2837. (l) Honeyman, C. H.; Peckham, T. J.;
Massey, J. A.; Manners, I. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1996, 2589-
2590. (m) Mizuta, T.; Yamasaki, T.; Nakazawa, H.; Miyoshi, K.
Organometallics 1996, 15, 1093-1100. (n) Podlaha, J.; Stepnicka, P.;
Ludvik, J.; Cisarova, I. Organometallics 1996, 15, 543-550. (o)
Honeyman, C. H.; Foucher, D. A.; Dahmen, F. Y.; Rulkens, R.; Lough,
A. J.; Manners, I. Organometallics 1995, 14, 5503-5512. (p) Butler, I.
R.; Cullen, W. R.; Rettig, S. J.; White, A. S. C. J. Organomet. Chem.
1995, 492, 157-164. (q) Cullen, W. R.; Rettig, S. J.; Zheng, T. C. J.
Organomet. Chem. 1993, 452, 97-103. (r) Butler, I. R. Polyhedron
1992, 11, 3117-3121. (s) Butler, I. R.; Cullen, W. R.; Rettig, S. J.
Organometallics 1987, 6, 872-880. (t) Butler, I. R.; Cullen, W. R.; Kim,
T. J.; Rettig, S. J.; Trotter, J. Organometallics 1985, 4, 972-980. (u)
Butler, I. R.; Cullen, W. R.; Einstein, F. W. B.; Willis, A. C. Organo-
metallics 1985, 4, 603-604. (v) Butler, I. R.; Cullen, W. R. Organo-
metallics 1984, 3, 1846-1851.
Our group has recently reported the ring-opening
polymerization of PPh-bridged [1]ferrocenophane in-
duced by UV-vis irradiation.10 In addition to polymeric
products, dimers were isolated from the reaction mix-
ture, though their yields were low. Here we report the
details of their molecular structures, syn-anti prefer-
ence, and coordination behavior to a metal fragment.
(10) Mizuta, T.; Onishi, M.; Miyoshi, K. Organometallics 2000, 19,
5005-5009.