C. Yang et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 15 (2005) 1505–1507
1507
Table 2. Biological data in vivo
Bjarnason, N. H.; Morrow, M.; Lippman, M. E.; Black,
D.; Glusman, J. E.; Costa, A.; Jordan, V. C. J. Am. Med.
Assoc. 1999, 281, 2189; (b) Jordan, V. C. J. Med. Chem.
2003, 46, 883; (c) Meegan, M. J.; Lloyd, D. G. Curr. Med.
Chem. 2003, 10, 181; (d) Bryant, H. U. Endocrine and
Metabolism Disorders 2002, 3, 231.
Compd
Bone mineral density
(mg/cm3)
Uterine weight assay
(mg)
2e
2n
432.1 10.6**###
482.5 37.5***#
540.8 77.6***#
549.1 75.2***
386.2 24.8
29.3 1.3*###
30.5 2.3*#
2q
38.8 9.8*##
52.0 6.0***
28.9 1.1
2. (a) Gao, H.; Katzenellenbogen, J. A.; Garg, R.; Hansch,
G. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 723; (b) Grese, T. A.; Dodge, J.
A. Curr. Pharm. Design 1998, 4, 71; (c) Schmid, C. D.;
Sluka, J. P.; Duke, K. M. Tetrahedron. Lett. 1999, 40, 675;
(d) Grese, T. A.; Pennington, L. D.; Sluka, J. P.; Adrian,
M. D.; Cole, H. W.; Fuson, T. R.; Magee, D. E.; Phillips,
D. L.; Rowley, E. R.; Shetler, P. K.; Short, L. L.;
Venugopalan, M.; Yang, N. N.; Sato, M.; Glasebrook, A.
L.; Bryant, H. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 1272; (e) Grese, T.
A.; Cho, S.; Finley, D. R.; Godfrey, A. G.; Jones, C. D.;
Lugar, C. W.; Martin, M. J.; Matsumoto, K.; Pennington,
L. D.; Winter, M. A.; Adrian, M. D.; Cole, H. W.; Magee,
D. E.; Phillips, D. L.; Rowley, E. R.; Short, L. L.;
Glasevrook, A. L.; Bryant, H. U. J. Med. Chem. 1997, 40,
146.
Raloxifene
OVX + DW
Sham + DW
592.0 51.9***#
203.4 37.6***###
Kun-Ming female mice of two months old which were ovariectomized
were treated (sc) with test compounds for 4 weeks at 4 lM. The bone
mineral density was determined by peripheral quantitative computed
tomography (pQCT, Stratec XCT-Research SA). The uterine weights
were determined on the day the mice were killed (n = 5).
* P > 0.05.
** P < 0.05.
*** P < 0.01 versus distilled water (DW).
# p > 0.05.
## p < 0.05.
### p < 0.01 versus raloxifene.
3. (a) Shiau, A. K.; Barstad, D.; Loria, P. M.; Cheng, L.;
Kushner, P. J.; Agard, D. A.; Greene, G. L. Cell 1998, 95,
927; (b) Brzozowski, A. M.; Pike, A. C. W.; Dauter, Z.;
Hubbard, R. E.; Bonn, T.; Engstrom, O.; Ohman, L.;
Greene, G. L.; Gustafsson, J.-A.; Carlquist, M. Nature
1997, 389, 753.
substituents on piperazines displayed lower agonist
property in bone and higher antagonist property in uter-
ine tissue than smaller substituents (Table 2).
In summary, the piperazine basic side chain was found
to be functionally equipotent to the aminoethoxy group
in benzothiophenes SERMs. Of all the compounds
tested, 2q was found to have highest binding affinity
and selectivity for ER a. It is also a potent agonist in
bone tissue and an antagonist in uterus. Itꢀs expected
that these findings could provide a valuable hit in devel-
oping new SERMs.
4. Watanabe, N.; Nakagawa, H.; Ikeno, A.; Minato, H.;
Kohayakawa, C.; Tsuji, J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2003,
13, 4317.
5. Jones, C. D.; Jevnikar, M. G.; Pike, A. J.; Peters, M. K.;
Black, L. J.; Thompson, A. R.; Falcone, J. F.; Clemens, J.
A. J. Med. Chem. 1984, 27, 1057.
6. Smith, W. J., III; Sawyer, J. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37,
299.
7. Ram, S.; Spicer, L. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 515.
8. Schopfer, U.; Schoeffter, P.; Bischoff, S.; Nozulak, J.;
Feuerbach, D.; Floersheim, P. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45,
1399.
Acknowledgement
9. Yan, X. M.; Zhang, Z. D. Chin. J. Osteoporosis 2004, 10,
288.
This work was financially supported in part by the
National Natural Science Foundation of China
(20302009).
10. Physical data of 2q: 1H NMR (400 MHz, acetone-d6) d
1.02 (6H, d, J = 6.3), 2.60 (4H, t, J = 5.0), 2.69 (1H, m),
3.33 (4H, t, J = 5.0), 6.74 (2H, q, J = 1.9, J = 6.6), 6.83
(2H, d, J = 9.0), 6.90 (1H, dd, J = 2.2, J = 8.8), 7.26–7.30
(3H, m), 7.35 (1H, d, J = 2.2), 7.63 (2H, q, J = 1.9, J =
7.1). Mp 158–160 ꢂC. MS(EI):472(M+). Anal. Calcd for
C28H28N2O3SÆ2H2O: C, 66.12; H, 6.34; N, 5.51. Found: C,
66.19; H, 6.06; N, 5.39.
References and notes
1. (a) Cummings, S. R.; Eckert, S.; Krueger, K. A.; Gray, D.;
Powles, T. J.; Cauley, J. A.; Norton, L.; Nickelson, T.;