1614
S. Francese et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 46 (2005) 1611–1615
3. Kim, S.-Y.; Jeitner, T. M.; Steinert, P. M. Neurochem. Int.
2002, 40, 85.
Further information on the type of inhibition (competi-
tive, noncompetitive, and uncompetitive) of 3A on tTG
activity were obtained through a kinetic study.15 As
shown in Figure 3, 3A exhibited a noncompetitive inhi-
bition with respect to the amino acceptor substrate
DMC (Fig. 3, panel B1) and uncompetitive with respect
to amino donor substrate Spd (Fig. 3, panel B2). These
results lend support to a tTG/3A complex formation
promoted by a specific surface recognition on a region
noncomprising the enzyme active site (hot spot).5c Con-
sequently, TG inhibition could be due to a conforma-
tional rearrangement of the active form produced by
the enzyme/inhibitor recognition interaction.
4. (a) Kogen, H.; Kiho, T.; Tago, K.; Miyamoto, S.; Fujioka,
T.; Otsuka, N.; Suzuki-Konagai, K.; Ogita, T. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 1842; (b) Hausch, F.; Halttunen, T.;
Ma¨ki, M.; Khosla, C. Chem. Biol. 2003, 10, 225.
5. (a) Park, H. S.; Lin, Q.; Hamilton, A. D. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1999, 121, 8; (b) Blaskovich, M. A.; Lin, Q.; Delarue,
F. L.; Sun, J.; Park, H. S.; Coppola, D.; Hamilton, A. D.;
Sebti, S. M. Nat. Biotechnol. 2000, 18, 1065; (c) Peczuh,
M. W.; Hamilton, A. D. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 2479; (d)
Jain, R. K.; Hamilton, A. D. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1721; (e)
Park, H. S.; Lin, Q.; Hamilton, A. D. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 5105; (f) Gradl, S. N.; Felix, J. P.;
Isacoff, E. Y.; Garcia, M. L.; Trauner, D. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2003, 125, 12668; (g) Mecca, T.; Consoli, G. M. L.;
Geraci, C.; Cunsolo, F. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2004, 12,
5057.
6. For an account on peptidocalixarenes, see: (a) Casnati, A.;
Sansone, F.; Ungaro, R. Acc. Chem. Res. 2003, 36, 246;
(b) For a general review on calixarenes, see: Calixarenes
2001; Asfari, Z., Bo¨hmer, V., Harrowfield, J., Vicens, J.,
Eds.; Kluwer, 2001; (c) For examples of on-bead peptido-
calixarene libraries, see: Hioki, H.; Ohnishi, Y.; Kubo, M.;
Nashimoto, E.; Kinoshita, Y.; Samejima, M.; Kodama,
M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 561, and refs therein.
7. Sansone, F.; Barboso, S.; Casnati, A.; Fabbi, M.; Pochini,
A.; Ugozzoli, F.; Ungaro, R. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1998,
897.
On the basis of the above results, we concluded that the
sequences Gly-Phe-Gly-Tyr (3A) and Gly-Phe-Gly-Phe
(3Ia) are the most effective tTG inhibitors in the frame
of our tetrapeptidocalix[4]arene library. Interestingly,
both compounds have the same internal sequence (Phe-
Gly), which appears to be important for a specific sur-
face recognition of tTG. Furthermore, the presence of
an apolar aromatic moiety in the side chain of the termi-
nal amino acid appears to be also necessary. In fact, a
comparable activity was observed for 3Ia and 3A ending
with phenylalanine and But-O-protected tyrosine,
respectively, whereas the corresponding O-deprotected
derivative 3Aa showed a lower efficiency (Fig. 1). On
the other hand, the best inhibitory effect on mTG was
observed with derivatives 3Na and 3Pa (Fig. 2), having
a very similar sequence (Gly-Leu-Phe-Phe and Gly-Leu-
Gly-Phe, respectively), again supporting the specificity
of surface recognition by different diversomers on the
two TG isoforms.
8. Lazzarotto, M.; Sansone, F.; Baldini, L.; Casnati, A.;
Cozzini, P.; Ungaro, R. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 595.
9. (a) Beyermann, M.; Bienert, M.; Niedrich, H.; Carpino, L.
A.; Sadat-Aalaee, D. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 721; (b)
Carpino, L. A.; Sadat-Aalaee, D.; Beyermann, M. J. Org.
Chem. 1990, 55, 1673.
10. TGs inhibition assay: TGs activity was assayed according
to a modified reported procedure (Achyuthan, K. E.;
Greenberg, C. S. J. Biol. Chem. 1987, 262, 1901) Briefly,
mTG or tTG (1.28 · 10À7 M) were incubated at 37 ꢁC for
1h in 125 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, 70 nM [ 3H]Spd, 10 mM
dithiothreitol, 2.5 mM CaCl2 (for tTG only) and 0.2 mg
DMC (0.1mL of final volume), in the absence or in the
presence of each chemical compound (0.01, 0.1 or
1 · 10À3 M). Data have been reported as the mean the
standard error (SE) obtained from three separate deter-
minations in which each point was performed in duplicate.
Statistical analysis was performed with StudentÕs t-test.
11. The complete deprotection of compounds 3A–P to give
3Aa–Pa, was obtained by consecutive treatments, when
required, to remove the OMe protection at C-terminus
carboxylic group (LiOH, EtOH, 12 h, rt), the But-O-
protection at the side chain of Tyr and Asp (3 N HCl,
MeOH, 16 h, rt), or the Boc protection of e-amino group
of Lys (TFA, CH2Cl2, 2 h, rt). Partially deprotected
derivatives 3Ab–Pb and 3Ac–Pc, were obtained, when
applicable, by a single treatment under basic or acid
conditions, respectively.
In conclusion, this study demonstrates that TGs can be
inhibited by peptidocalix[4]arene diversomers by means
of unconventional protein surface recognition, but
further efforts are required to improve their limited
efficiency. The extension of this strategy to the elabora-
tion of a second generation of TGs inhibitors may include
the less symmetrical attachment of diverse peptide chains
on the same scaffold or the use of a calix[4]arene skeleton
bearing both NH2 and COOH groups to give peptidomi-
metic N,C-linked derivatives.16 Both approaches are cur-
rently under study in our laboratory.
Acknowledgements
Financial supports from the Italian MIUR (COFIN-
2003, Supramolecular Devices Project and Prj. No.
200306302_004) are gratefully acknowledged. Thanks
are due to Dr. A. DÕAmato (Department of Chemistry,
University of Salerno) for ESI-MS measurements.
12. The compounds 1D–P were synthesized by general Fmoc
solid phase synthesis, see: Chan, W.; White, P. D. Fmoc
Solid Phase Peptide Synthesis: A Practical Approach;
Oxford University Press: New York, 2000. The computer-
controlled automated synthesizer ASW100 was manufac-
tured by CHEMSPEED Ltd–Rheinstrasse 32, CH 4302
Augst, Switzerland.
References and notes
13. Tetrapeptides 1D–H were detached form the solid support
by treatment with MeOH, N(Et)3, in DMF for 2 d
[conditions (f) in Scheme 1], while for derivatives 1I–P a
treatment with CF3COOH, (Et)3SiH in CH2Cl2, for 1h,
was used [conditions (g), Scheme 1].
1. Folk, J. E.; Finlayson, J. S. Adv. Protein Chem. 1977,
31, 1 .
2. (a) Lorand, L.; Graham, M. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.
2003, 4, 140; (b) Esposito, C.; Caputo, I. FEBS J. 2005,
272, 615.