C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 1. Synthesized Sequences of 18mer GNA Oligonucleotides
3′-TTTTAAATTTTAATATAT-2′
2′-AAAATTTAAAATTATATA-3′
6
7
antiparallel duplex
(TM ) 63 °C)
3′-TAAAATTTATATTATTAA-2′
2′-ATTTTAAATATAATAATT-3′
8
9
antiparallel duplex
(TM ) 63 °C)
3′-TAAAATTTATATTATTAA-2′
3′-ATTTTAAATATAATAATT-2′
8
10
parallel duplex
(no TM)
3′-TAAAATTTATATTATTAA-2′
2′-ATTTTAAATTTAATAATT-3′
8
11
one mismatch
(TM ) 55 °C)
3′-TAAAATTTATATTATTAA-2′
2′-ATTTAAAATTTAATAATT-3′
8
12
two mismatches
(TM ) 44 °C)
Figure 4. (a) CD spectra of a 1:1 mixture of GNA strands 8 + 9 (4 µM
each), the individual strands 8 and 9 (4 µM each), and a mixture of glycol
nucleosides T and A (36 µM each) at 25 °C. Insert: CD signal at 220 nm
for different ratios of 8 to 9 in which the concentration of single strands 8
and 9 together is 8 µM for each data point. (b) Temperature-dependent CD
spectra of a 1:1 mixture (4 µM each) of GNA strands 8 + 9. Experiments
were performed in 10 mM sodium phosphate pH 7.0 with 200 mM NaCl.
The color coding is related to Figure 1.
forms highly stable antiparallel helical duplex structures following
the Watson-Crick base pairing rules. We believe that these
properties will render GNA a very valuable tool in contemporary
nucleic acid chemistry. At last, we wish to note that GNA may be
the most atom economical solution for a functional nucleic acid
backbone. We are therefore tempted to propose that GNA was a
potential predecessor of RNA as a genetic material and catalyst
for Earth’s earliest organisms.10
Figure 3. UV melting curves monitored at 260 nm. (a) (S)-GNA strands
6 + 7 (2 µM each) and the individual strands 6 (2 µM) and 7 (2 µM). (b)
(S)-GNA strands 8 + 9 (2 µM each) and the individual strands 8 and 9 (2
µM each). (c) (S)-GNA strands (2 µM each) 8 + 9 (leading to an antiparallel
duplex), 8 + 10 (parallel duplex), 8 + 11 (antiparallel duplex with one
mismatch), and 8 + 12 (antiparallel duplex with two mismatches). (d)
Duplexes with the sequence 8 + 9 (2 µM each strand) of RNA (U instead
of T), (S)-GNA, and RNA/(S)-GNA hybrid. Experiments were performed
in 10 mM sodium phosphate pH 7.0 with 200 mM NaCl, and 1 mM of
EDTA in experiments which include RNA strands. Data for UV melting
experiments were collected at 0.2 or 0.5 °C increments with a temperature
ramp of 0.5 °C/min.
Acknowledgment. We thank the University of Pennsylvania,
LRSM-MRSEC, and the ACS Petroleum Research Fund (Type G
grant) for supporting this research. We are also grateful for support
from the laboratories of Dr. Ivan J. Dmochowski (UV melting),
Dr. Marc M. Greenberg (UV melting), and Dr. Feng Gai (CD).
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures for
the synthesis of (S)-4, (R)-4, (S)-5, (R)-5, and their incorporation into
oligonucleotides, UV melting curves and CD spectra. This material is
42.5 °C, U instead of T) by 22.5 and 20.5 °C, respectively. This is
astonishing considering the fact that the GNA backbone is
completely acyclic. It has been widely assumed that nucleic acid
analogues containing a phosphodiester backbone need to be cyclic
in order to produce the required conformational preorganization
for duplex formation.8,9 However, the GNA strands 8 and 9 show
a significant Cotton effect, suggesting a helical preorganization of
the GNA backbone already in the single strand. This conclusion is
also supported by the observation that a mixture of glycol
nucleosides T and A almost does not give any CD signals,
demonstrating that the Cotton effect is not simply the result of the
chiral centers in the glycol backbone (Figure 4a).
Finally, we investigated antiparallel crosspairing between (S)-
GNA, (R)-GNA, DNA, and RNA. We observed that (S)-GNA and
(R)-GNA do not undergo antiparallel crosspairing with each other,
nor do they form stable antiparallel crosspairs with DNA. On the
other hand, only (S)-GNA crosspairs with RNA (TM ) 35 °C for
RNA 8 with (S)-GNA 9; see Figure 3d). In this respect, it is
noteworthy that (S)-GNA is directly derived from TNA by
eliminating a CH2O unit from the tetrahydrofuran ring.
References
(1) For a review on the chemical etiology of nucleic acid structure, see:
Eschenmoser, A. Science 1999, 284, 2118-2124.
(2) For a review on oligonucleotide analogues with phosphodiester connectiv-
ity, see: Leumann, C. J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2002, 10, 841-854.
(3) For oligonucleotide analogues containing an uncharged pseudopeptide
backbone, see: (a) Nielsen, P. E. Acc. Chem. Res. 1999, 32, 624-630.
(b) Diederichsen, U. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 1886-1889.
(4) Scho¨ning, K.-U.; Scholz, P.; Guntha, S.; Wu, X.; Krishnamurthy, R.;
Eschenmoser, A. Science 2000, 290, 1347-1351.
(5) For using the glycol backbone in a single metallo-nucleobase pair, see:
Zhang, L.; Meggers, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 74-75.
(6) Kolb, H. C.; Finn, M. G.; Sharpless, K. B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001,
40, 2004-2021.
(7) For related epoxide ring openings with nucleobases, see: (a) Baumgartner,
H.; Marschner, C.; Pucher, R.; Griengl, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32,
611-614. (b) Ludek, O. R.; Meier, C. Synthesis 2003, 2101-2109.
(8) Acyclic nucleotides have been demonstrated to strongly destabilize duplex
DNA: (a) Schneider, K. C.; Benner, S. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112,
453-455. (b) Peng, L.; Roth, H.-J. HelV. Chim. Acta 1997, 80, 1494-
1512.
(9) For the concept of conformational restriction of nucleosides as a measure
for preorganizing oligonucleotide single strands for duplex formation,
see: (a) Tarko¨y, M.; Leumann, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1993,
32, 1432-1434. (b) Steffens, R.; Leumann, C. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999,
121, 3249-3255. (c) Wengel, J. Acc. Chem. Res. 1999, 32, 301-310.
(10) For a review on the origin of life, see: Orgel, L. E. Trends Biochem. Sci.
1998, 23, 491-495.
In summary, we have described a structurally simple and
synthetically easily accessible acyclic glycol nucleic acid which
JA042564Z
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 12, 2005 4175