Oxidative Cyclorelease from Soluble Polymeric Supports
FIGURE 2. Oxidative cleavage reactions of homobenzylic
ethers.
cyclorelease reactions occur efficiently upon single elec-
tron oxidation to provide products of high purity. Ad-
ditionally we show that single electron oxidation is an
excellent trigger for traceless liberation11 of aldehydes
and ketones from polymeric supports even in the absence
of an internal nucleophile.
FIGURE 3. ROMP approach to oligonorbornenes.
mer prove to be susceptible to oxidation, olefin hydroge-
nation removes all redox active groups in the support.15
(5) Molecular weight can be controlled rationally by
adjusting metathesis catalyst loading or employing a
different catalyst16 in order to alter the solubility proper-
ties of the polymer to suit the needs of a particular class
of substrate. Based on structure-reactivity studies con-
ducted in our labs relating the effects of arene substitu-
tion to the propensity of intermediate radical cations to
fragment,10b,17 we chose to attach the polymer to the
substrates through an ether linkage at the para position
of the arene.
Upon single electron oxidation homobenzylic ethers
undergo mesolytic cleavage reactions to form benzyl
radicals and oxocarbenium ions.12 This process is revers-
ible and, in the absence of a rapid ensuing reaction, the
radical cation can be regenerated and reduced by solvent
with no net reaction being observed. Appending a nu-
cleophile to the homobenzylic ether in a manner that
allows for a rapid addition into the intermediate oxocar-
benium ion, however, makes the oxidative cleavage
irreversible and provides cyclic products. This protocol
is well-suited for cyclorelease applications since rapid and
irreversible carbon-carbon bond cleavage is observed
only in the presence of an appropriate nucleophile.
Capping the homobenzylic oxygen with an electrofugal
group that will depart from the oxocarbenium ion rapidly
to form an aldehyde or ketone represents an alternative
method for driving the radical-ion pair toward a stable
product. This approach, while not subject to the editing
mechanism of cyclorelease, is a unique method for
unmasking carbonyl groups during polymer supported
syntheses.
Results and Discussion
A representative synthesis of a polymer-supported
substrate and the subsequent cyclorelease are shown in
Scheme 1. Hydroxymethyl norbornene (3), which can be
purchased or prepared in multigram quantities through
an easy two-step sequence,18 was converted to iodide 4
in three steps. As a demonstration of concept homoben-
zylic ether 519 was appended to the norbornene monomer
to provide 6. Oligomerization of 6 proceeded smoothly in
the presence of 5 mol % of the second generation Grubbs
metathesis catalyst (2)20 to yield, after capping with ethyl
vinyl ether, polymer 7 with a predicted molecular weight
distribution centered at appromimately 32 000 (60-
mer).21 Upon precipitation with methanol and drying the
polymer was isolated in 79% yield. Subjecting the polymer-
bound substrate to our standard photoinitiated aerobic
ETIC conditions (hν, Pyrex filtration, 2.5 mol % of
N-methylquinolinium hexafluorophosphate (NMQPF6),
O2, NaOAc, Na2S2O3, 1,2-dichloroethane, toluene)22 fol-
lowed by filtering the reaction mixture over a short plug
of silica gel provided the desired tetrahydrofuran 8 in
72% yield contaminated with only minor amounts of
aromatic impurities. This yield is comparable to the yield
observed for the oxidative cyclization of the corresponding
monomeric substrate (84%).10b
The oligonorbornene scaffolding,13 prepared from ring-
opening metathesis polymerization (ROMP) of an ap-
propriately substituted norbornene monomer, was se-
lected as the support for this study in consideration of
several desirable attributes. (1) The polymers are soluble
in most organic solvents but precipitate in high yield
upon methanol addition.14 (2) Loading levels in these
systems are quite high relative to other soluble polymers
such as poly(ethylene glycol). (3) The polymers can be
characterized by standard spectroscopic techniques
throughout the course of a synthetic sequence. (4) Oxida-
tive decomposition of the support is not expected to be a
problem under cyclorelease conditions. Should the poly-
(11) Comely, A. C.; Gibson, S. E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40,
1012.
(12) (a) Arnold, D. R.; Lamont, L. J. Can. J. Chem. 1989, 67, 2119.
(b) Perrott, A. L.; Arnold, D. R. Can. J. Chem. 1992, 70, 272. (c) Arnold,
D. R.; Du, X.; Chen, J. Can. J. Chem. 1995, 73, 307. (d) Perrott, A. L.;
de Lisjer, H. J. P.; Arnold, D. R. Can. J. Chem. 1997, 75, 384. (e)
Baciocchi, E.; Bietti, M.; Putignani, L.; Steenken, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1996, 118, 5952. (f) Baciocchi, E.; Bietti, M.; Lanzalunga, O. Acc. Chem.
Res. 2000, 33, 243. (g) Chen, L.; Farahat, M. S.; Gan, H.; Farid, S.;
Whitten, D. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 6398. (h) Freccero, M.;
Pratt, A.; Albini, A.; Long, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 284.
(13) For initial applications of this scaffolding to multistep synthesis,
see: (a) Ball, C. P.; Barrett, A. G. M.; Poitout, L. F.; Smith, M. C.;
Thorn, Z. E. Chem. Commun. 1998, 2453. (b) Harned, A. M.; Mukher-
jee, S.; Flynn, D. L.; Hanson, P. R. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 15.
(14) Barrett, A. G. M.; Hopkins, B. T.; Ko¨bberling, J. Chem. Rev.
2002, 102, 3301.
(15) Arnauld, T.; Barrett, A. G. M.; Hopkins, B. T. Tetrahedron Lett.
2002, 43, 1081.
(16) Harned, A. M.; Hanson, P. R. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 1007.
(17) Wang, L.; Seiders, J. R., II; Floreancig, P. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2004, 126, 12596.
(18) Moore, J. D.; Harned, A. M.; Henle, J.; Flynn, D. L.; Hanson,
P. R. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 1847.
(19) The synthesis of this compound is detailed in the Supporting
Information.
(20) Scholl, M.; Ding, S.; Lee, C. W.; Grubbs, R. H. Org. Lett. 1999,
1, 953.
(21) Moore, J. D.; Byrne, R. J.; Vedantham, P.; Flynn, D. L.; Hanson,
P. R. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4241.
(22) Kumar, V. S.; Aubele, D. L.; Floreancig, P. E. Org. Lett. 2001,
3, 4123.
J. Org. Chem, Vol. 70, No. 10, 2005 3815