mediated by EDC resulted in tripeptide 18. Fmoc cleavage
with diethylamine of 18 in acetonitrile produced the free
amine of 18, which was then coupled with the acid 9 to afford
linear tetrapeptide 19 in 78% yield. Liberation of the ester
moiety in 19 with Pd/C-catalyzed hydrogenolysis followed
by coupling with pentafluorophenol delivered an activated
ester. This ester was treated with TFA to effect cleavage of
the Boc group and then subjected to macrocyclization in
methylene chloride mediated by aqueous NaHCO3 to provide
cyclic tetrapeptide 20 in 56% yield. It is noteworthy that
attempts at DPPA-mediated macrolactamization gave 20 in
less than 20% yield. Finally, removal of the silyl protecting
group in 20 with TBAF furnished FR235222 1.18 Importantly,
analytical data obtained for synthetic 1 were found to be
indistinguishable from literature precedence.1
Scheme 3
In conclusion, we have described here the first total
synthesis of FR235222 featuring a novel and convenient
protocol for elaboration of protected trans-4-methylproline
and a facile synthesis of amino acid 9 via olefin metathesis
with Grubbs RCM catalyst. Further investigations on the
structure-activity relationship of this immunosuppressant
made possible by the advances described here are in progress.
Acknowledgment. The authors are grateful to the Chinese
Academy of Sciences (Grant KGCX2-SW-209), National
Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 20321202), and
Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Munici-
pality (Grant 04DZ14901) for their financial support.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental pro-
cedures and characterizations for compounds 5-9, 11-14,
17-20, and 1. This material is available free of charge via
silyl ether of 13 with TBAF followed by mesylation of
resultant hydroxy group and reductive deoxygenation with
Zn/NaI16 afforded N-Boc-O-Bzl-trans-4-methylproline 14.
The overall yield for seven steps from 10 was about 25%.
Substitution of formaldehyde with other aldehydes at the first
step is envisioned to allow rapid assembly of other trans-
4-alkyl-prolines. Thus, the simplicity and generality of the
presented methodology should be comparable to existing
methods.11-13
OL050991R
(9) (a) Gibson, S. E.; Gibson, V. C.; Keen, S. Chem. Commun. 1997,
1107. For a review on recent developments in olefin cross-metathesis, see:
(b) Connon, S. J.; Blechert, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1900.
(10) Schwab, P.; Grubbs, R. H.; Ziller, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996,
118, 100.
(11) Nevalainen, M.; Kauppinen, P. M.; Koskinan, A. M. P. J. Org.
Chem. 2001, 66, 2061.
(12) Del Valle, J. R.; Goodman, M. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 3923.
(13) Wang, Q.; Sasaki, A.; Potier, P. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 15759.
(14) Dikshit, D. K.; Bajpai, S. N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 3231.
(15) Ezquerra, J.; Pedregal, C.; Escribano, A.; Carren˜o, M. C.; Garcia
Ruano, J. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 2053.
With synthons 9 and 14 in hand, we set out to construct
FR235222 as shown in Scheme 3. Coupling of Fmoc-
isovaline 15, prepared by Mutter’s procedure,17 with (S)-
phenylalanine benzyl ester 16, afforded dipeptide 17 in 90%
yield. Hydrogenolysis of the benzyl group in 17 and
subsequent connection of the liberated amine from 14
(16) Fujimoto, Y.; Tatsuno, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1976, 37, 3325.
(17) Nebel, K.; Mutter, M. Tetrahedron 1988, 44, 4793.
(18) Selected data for 1: [R]23 ) -129.1 (c 0.5, CHCl3), [lit1: [R]23
D
D
) -129.1 (c 0.5, CHCl3)]; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.52 (d, J )
10.2 Hz, 1H), 7.29-7.20 (m, 5H), 7.17 (d, J ) 10.6 Hz, 1H), 5.83 (s, 1H),
5.16 (ddd, J ) 6.3, 9.7, 9.9 Hz, 1H), 4.24-4.17 (m, 2H), 4.05 (dd, J )
7.8, 9.7 Hz, 1H), 3.54 (d, J ) 4.5 Hz, 1H), 3.24 (dd, J ) 9.9, 13.6 Hz,
1H), 2.95 (dd, J ) 6.1, 13.5 Hz, 1H), 2.73 (t, J ) 7.8 Hz, 1H), 2.63 (m,
1H), 2.54-2.28 (m, 4H), 2.16 (m, 1H), 1.80 (m, 1H), 1.63 (m, 3H), 1.38
(d, J ) 7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.33 (m, 5H), 1.28 (s, 3H), 0.88 (d, J ) 6.7 Hz, 3H),
0.84 (t, J ) 7.4 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 214.4, 175.6, 171.1,
171.8, 137.1, 129.1, 128.6, 126.7, 72.6, 63.1, 58.0, 54.5, 53.9, 53.4, 37.3,
35.8, 33.1, 32.9, 28.8, 27.9, 25.3, 23.3, 22.4, 19.9, 18.2, 16.5, 8.4; ESIMS
m/z 557 (M + H)+, 579 (M + Na)+; HRMS for C30H44N4O6Na (M +
Na)+ calcd 579.3158, found 579.3156.
(8) (a) Pastuszak, J.; Gardner, J. H.; Singh, J.; Rich, D. H. J. Org. Chem.
1982, 27, 1877. (b) Kawai, M.; Gardner, J. H.; Rich, D. H. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1986, 27, 1877. (c) Schmidt, U.; Beutler, U.; Lieberknecht, A. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1989, 28, 333. (d) Baldwin, J. E.; Adlington, R. M.;
Godfrey, C. R. A.; Patel, V. K. Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 7837. (e) Taunton,
J.; Collins, J. L.; Schreiber, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 10412. (f)
Durand, P.; Peralba, P.; Derain, V.; Komesli, S.; Renaut, P. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2001, 42, 2121. For a theoretical study for cyclization of cyclotet-
rapeptides, see: (g) Cavelier-Frontin, F.; Pepe, G.; Verducci, J.; Siri, D.;
Jacquier, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 8885.
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 13, 2005
2777