Aminolysis of Substituted 2-Methylbenzoates
analogues.11b In all cases, the Hammett plots have been
found to be curved downwardly (i.e., electron-donating
substituents exhibit negative deviations from the Ham-
mett plots, and the degree of deviations is more signifi-
cant for a stronger electron-donating substituent). Tra-
ditionally, such a curved Hammett plot has been
interpreted as a change in the rate-determining step.13,14
However, we have suggested that the stabilization of the
ground-state as illustrated by resonance structures I T
II is responsible for the nonlinear Hammett plots, since
SCHEME 1
the corresponding Yukawa-Tsuno plots are all linear
with large r values.5,6,10,11
The r value in the Yukawa-Tsuno equation (eq 1)
structures on the reactivity and reaction mechanism has
intrigued chemists for a long time.5-13
Jencks et al. have concluded that the nonleaving
phenoxy moiety influences the reaction mechanism for
the reactions of X-substituted phenyl 3,4-dinitrophenyl
carbonates with quinuclidines.7 A similar conclusion has
been drawn by Castro et al. for aminolyses of 2,4-
dinitrophenyl X-substituted benzoates8 and S-4-nitro-
phenyl X-substituted thiobenzoates.9 They have sug-
gested that an electron-withdrawing substituent in the
nonleaving group retards the rate of the leaving group
departure from T( (the k2 in Scheme 1) but accelerates
the expulsion of the amine from T( (the k-1 in Scheme
1).7-9 Thus, it has been concluded that the substituent
in the nonleaving group of the carbonates and benzoates
affects the reaction mechanism.7-9
However, we have shown that the k2/k-1 ratio is
independent of the electronic nature of the substituent
X for the reactions of 4-nitrophenyl X-substituted ben-
zoates (1a-e) with a series of alicyclic secondary amines.10
A similar result has been shown for the aminolyses of
2,4-dinitrophenyl X-substituted benzoates5 and benzene-
sulfonates6 and the alkaline hydrolyses of 2,4-dinitro-
phenyl X-substituted benzoates11a and their thiono
log (kX/kH) ) FX[σo + r(σ+ - σo)]
(1)
represents the resonance demand of the reaction center
or the extent of resonance contribution.15-17 The largest
r value reported for benzylic systems is 1.53 for solvolysis
of 1-aryl-2,2,2-trifluoroethyl tosylates, in which the reso-
nance demand is remarkably high due to the strong
electron-withdrawing ability of the R-CF3 group.15-17 On
the other hand, the r value has been suggested to
decrease significantly as the planarity of the aryl moiety
and the reaction center is hindered by twisting the aryl
moiety.15,18
Thus, we have extended our study to the reactions of
4-nitrophenyl X-substitued 2-methylbenzoates (2a-e)
(3) Menger, F. M.; Smith, J. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 3824-
3829.
(4) (a) Castro, E. A.; Aliaga, M.; Santos, J. G. J. Org. Chem. 2004,
69, 6711-6714. (b) Castro, E. A.; Cubillos, M.; Santos, J. G. J. Org.
Chem. 2004, 69, 4802-4807. (c) Castro, E. A.; Cubillos, M.; Aliaga,
M.; Evangelisti, S.; Santos, J. G. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 2411-2416.
(5) (a) Um, I. H.; Kim, K. H.; Park, H. R.; Fujio, M.; Tsuno, Y. J.
Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 3937-3942. (b) Um, I. H.; Min, J. S.; Lee, H. W.
Can. J. Chem. 1999, 77, 659-666.
(6) (a) Um, I. H.; Chun, S. M.; Chae, O. M.; Fujio, M.; Tsuno, Y. J.
Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 3166-3172. (b) Um, I. H.; Hong, J. Y.; Kim, J.
J.; Chae, O. M.; Bae, S. K. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 5180-5185.
(7) Gresser, M. J.; Jencks, W. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 6963-
6970.
and Y-substituted phenyl 2-methylbenzoates (3a-e) with
a series of alicyclic secondary amines, as shown in
(14) (a) Carrol, F. A. Pespectives on Structure and Mechanism in
Organic Chemistry, Brooks/Cole: New York, 1998: pp 371-386. (b)
Lowry, T. H.; Richardson, K. S. Mechanism and Theory in Organic
Chemistry, 3rd ed.; Harper Collins Publishers: New York, 1987; pp
143-151.
(15) (a) Tsuno, Y.; Fujio, M. Adv. Phys. Org. Chem. 1999, 32, 267-
385. (b) Tsuno, Y.; Fujio, M. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1996, 25, 129-139. (c)
Yukawa, Y.; Tsuno, Y. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1959, 32, 965-970.
(16) (a) Fujio, M.; Rappoport, Z.; Uddin, M. K.; Kim, H. J.; Tsuno,
Y. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2003, 76, 163-169. (b) Nakata, K.; Fujio, M.;
Nishimoto, K.; Tsuno, Y. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2003, 16, 323-335. (c)
Uddin, M. K.; Fujio, M.; Kim, H. J.; Rappoport, Z.; Tsuno, Y. Bull.
Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2002, 75, 1371-1379.
(17) Murata, A.; Sakaguchi, S.; Mishima, M.; Fujio, M.; Tusno, Y.
Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1990, 63, 1129-1137.
(18) (a) Nakata, K.; Fujio, M.; Saeki, Y.; Mishima, M.; Nishimoto,
K.; Tsuno, Y. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 1996, 9, 561-572. (b) Nakata, K.;
Fujio, M.; Saeki, Y.; Mishima, M.; Tsuno, Y.; Nishimoto, K. J. Phys.
Org. Chem. 1996, 9, 573-582.
(8) (a) Castro, E. A.; Santander, C. L. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 3595-
3600. (b) Castro, E. A.; Valdivia, J. L. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 1668-
1672. (c) Castro, E. A.; Steinfort, G. B. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2,
1983, 453-457.
(9) (a) Castro, E. A.; Bessolo, J.; Aguayo, R.; Santos, J. G. J. Org.
Chem. 2003, 68, 8157-8161. (b) Castro, E. A.; Vivanco, M.; Aguayo,
R.; Aguayo, R.; Santos, J. G. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 5399-5404.
(10) Um, I. H.; Min, J. S.; Ahn, J. A.; Hahn, H. J. J. Org. Chem.
2000, 65, 5659-5663.
(11) (a) Um, I. H.; Hahn, H. J.; Ahn, J. A.; kang, S.; Buncel, E. J.
Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 8475-8480. (b) Um, I. H.; Lee, J. Y.; Kim, H. T.;
Bae, S. K. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 2436-2441.
(12) (a) Um, I. H.; Seok, J. A.; Kim, H. T.; Bae, S. K. J. Org. Chem.
2003, 68, 7742-7746. (b) Um, I. H.; Lee, S. E.; Kwon, H. J. J. Org.
Chem. 2002, 67, 8999-9005.
(13) Swansburg, S.; Buncel, E.; Lemieux, R. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2000, 122, 6594-6600.
J. Org. Chem, Vol. 70, No. 13, 2005 4981