Scheme 4
Scheme 6
employing an excess of amine (5 equiv.) at 0 uC in the first step, the
reaction is chemoselective and leads only to the product derived
from the reaction of the PFP-ester.
The exquisite chemoselectivity observed here offers excellent
opportunities for diversity-oriented organic synthesis.
In summary we have shown that PFP-sulfonates are versatile
intermediates for the synthesis of sulfonamides under mild
conditions. The comparative studies presented in this paper
highlight the potential benefit of using PFP-sulfonates as opposed
to sulfonyl chlorides.
Scheme 5
sulfonyl chlorides. This feature along with our previous observa-
tions regarding stability led us to explore the possibility that PFP
sulfonates might be employed under reaction conditions that were
not compatible with sulfonyl chlorides. Our first approach to this
focused on the possibility of carrying out reactions in aqueous
media. Thus, a representative sulfonyl chloride (benzenesulfonyl
chloride) was mixed with a comparable PFP sulfonate ester (para-
toluenepentafluorophenyl sulfonate, PFP tosylate) in an aqueous
medium. Addition of one equivalent of a primary amine
(4-methylbenzylamine) led to the isolation of the sulfonamide 11
derived from the reaction of PFP tosylate 8 with the amine. None
of the product corresponding to reaction with benzenesulfonyl
chloride was observed (Scheme 4). Presumably, the sulfonyl
chloride 9 is hydrolysed rapidly under the reaction conditions.
The utility of PFP esters in the coupling of carboxylic acids and
amines or alcohols is well documented and known to be a facile
process even at low temperatures.6 We therefore wished to
compare the reactivity of a PFP sulfonate and a PFP carboxylate
in a substrate that would demonstrate the synthetic utility of their
differing reactivities.
Stephen Caddick,*a Jonathan D. Wildena and Duncan B. Juddb
aDepartment of Chemistry, University College London, 20 Gordon
Street, London, UK WC1H 0AJ. E-mail: s.caddick@ucl.ac.uk
bGlaxoSmithKline, Third Avenue, Harlow, Essex, UK CM19 5AW
Notes and references
1 (a) T. H. Maren, Ann. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol., 1976, 16, 309; (b)
C. T. Suparan, F. Briganti, S. Tilli, W. R. Chegwidden and A. Scozzafaza,
Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2001, 9, 703.
2 (a) W. R. Roush, S. L. Gwaltney, II, J. M. Cheng, K. A. Scheidt,
J. H. McKerrow and E. Hansell, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 10994; (b)
J. J. Reddick, J. M. Cheng and W. R. Roush, Org. Lett., 2003, 5, 1967;
(c) A. A. Hernandez and W. R. Roush, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 2002, 6,
459; (d) W. R. Roush, J. M. Cheng, B. Knapp-Reed, A. Alvarez-
Hernandez, J. H. McKerrow, E. Hansell and J. C. Engel, Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett., 2001, 11, 2759.
3 S. Caddick, J. D. Wilden, S. J. Wadman, H. D. Bush and D. B. Judd,
Org. Lett., 2002, 4, 2549.
4 S. Caddick, J. D. Wilden and D. B. Judd, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126,
1024.
In order to carry out such a comparison we prepared the bis-
PFP derivative 13 from 12 and our recently described coupling
protocol4
(triphenylphosphine
ditriflate/pentafluorophenol)
(Scheme 5). It was noted that in this case, and in other cases
where poor solubility in DCM is a problem, sonication can be
used to enhance the solubility and reduce reaction times.7,8
Addition of 1 equiv. of allylamine to the bis-PFP ester 13 at 0 uC
led to amide 14 formation exclusively. Subsequent addition of
piperidine and heating of the mixture to 65 uC led to the
sulfonamide 15 in excellent yield (Scheme 6). Inverse addition of
the two amines in this protocol leads to the products 16 and then
17. Any of the four products is readily isolated and purified by
recrystallisation or column chromatography. It is notable that even
5 (a) For a complete overview of this mechanism, see: I. M. Gordon,
H. Maskill and M. F. Ruasse, Chem. Soc. Rev., 1989, 18, 123 and
references therein; (b) J. F. King, J. Y. L. Lam and S. Skonieczny, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 1743; (c) S. N. Lyashchuck, Y. G. Skrypnik and
V. P. Besrodnyi, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1993, 6, 1153.
6 (a) L. Kisfalud, M. Low, O. Nyeki, T. Szirtes and I. Schon, Liebigs Ann.
Chem., 1973, 1421; (b) L. Kisfalud, J. E. Roberts, R. H. Johnson,
G. L. Mayers and J. Kovacs, J. Org. Chem., 1970, 35, 3563; (c) B. Penke,
L. Balaspiri, P. Pallai and K. Kovacs, Acta Phys. Chem., 1974, 20, 471;
(d) L. Kisfalud and I. Schon, Synthesis, 1983, 325.
7 T. Kimura and T. Ando, J. Synth. Org. Chem. Jpn., 1988, 46, 1124.
8 R. Miethchen, Ultrasonics, 1992, 30, 173.
2728 | Chem. Commun., 2005, 2727–2728
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2005