Angewandte
Chemie
a detailed understanding of the reaction mechanism. The
results are very similar to those obtained with 3 as the
precatalyst in EDA and BnDA polymerization reactions. In
absence of methanol, clear repeating patterns of
[(C8H11)RhIII-(CHCOOR)n-OH]+ growing chains were
detected (series I, R = Et, Scheme 3), as well as terminated
[H-(CHOOR)n-OH + Na]+ chains (series II, R = Et). Again,
in the presence of methanol patterns of [(C8H11)RhIII-
(CHCOOR)n-OMe]+ growing chains (series III, R = Et) and
patterns of terminated [H-(CHCOOR)n-OMe + Na]+ chains
containing a methoxy end group (series IV, R = Et) appeared
(Figures S8 and S9 in the Supporting Information). Similar
results were obtained using BnDA instead of EDA
(Scheme 3, R’ = H, R = Bn; Figure S10). Important to note
here is that these series I–IV (R’ = H) were detected using
Scheme 4. [(C8H12)Rh(N3Ph2)] (4), the 2-rhodaoxetane complex 5, and
its isomer allyl-b-alkyl-hydroxide compound 6.
precursors
containing
a
2-rhodaoxetane
fragment
(C8H12O)RhIII.
Complex 5 is formed in good yield and in good purity by
oxidation of the triazenide precursor [(C8H12)Rh(N3Ph2)] (4)
with O2.[13] Complexes 4–6 were evaluated as catalyst
precursors in the carbene polymerization of EDA (Table 1).
As expected, [(triazenide)RhI(cod)] complex 4 is active, but it
is less active than the non-oxidized [(R’2C8H10)RhI(prolinate)]
complexes (R’ = H: 1; R’ = Me: 2). However, oxidation of 4 to
5 markedly improves the polymerization over oligomeriza-
tion/dimerization selectivity, thus leading to substantially
improved polymer yield (66%). Conversion of 5 into 6
further increases the selectivity towards polymer formation
(80%), while at the same time the initiation efficiency
(percentage of active Rh-species) increases (see Table 1).
The above data are in excellent agreement with the
markedly different polymerization kinetics of complex 4, 5,
and 6 under identical reaction conditions (Figures S16 and
S17 in the Supporting Information). The reaction with
complex 4 is very slow (full EDA conversion requires more
than 10 h). Complex 5 converts EDA substantially faster than
4 (full conversion in ca. 5 h), but much slower than 6 (full
conversion in only a few minutes). These kinetic data are best
explained by a progressively easy catalyst activation process
on going from 4 via 5 to 6 under the applied reaction
conditions, thus leading to a higher amount of active polymer-
forming Rh-species (in good agreement with the data in
shown in Table 1).
pure samples of 5 and 6 as precatalysts, and hence the RhIII
À
OH fragments (at which chain growth starts) must be formed
from these complexes. Therefore, 5 and 6 must liberate
a hydroxide fragment from their oxidized cod moiety to form
+
the observed active cationic allylic [(C8H11)RhIII OH]
À
species. A straightforward explanation is that 5 rearranges
to 6 under the catalytic conditions, after which the complex
loses the triazenide ligand and undergoes a b-hydroxy
elimination from the allyl-b-alkyl-hydroxide ligand to gen-
+
erate the active allylic [(C8H11)RhIII OH] species. DFT
À
calculations (b3lyp, def2-TZVP) confirm that this is an
energetically favorable and kinetically accessible pathway
(Scheme 5).
Hence, it is clear that the allyl-b-alkyl-hydroxide complex
6 more easily converts into the active polymer forming species
than 2-rhodaoxetane 5. Yet, still only a minor amount of
species 6 becomes active in the polymerization event
(ca. 7%), thus showing that complex 6 itself is still a pre-
catalyst that requires further activation under the applied
reaction conditions (i.e. loss of the triazenide ligand and
ligand rearrangement). The low efficiency of this process is
likely due to competing and unwanted side-reactions with
EDA during the incubation time of the reaction, possibly
related to sluggish displacement of the bidentate triazenide
N ligand from rhodium(III). However, complex 6 does give
easier access to the polymer forming growing-chain species
than non-oxidized [(cod)RhI] or [(Me2cod)RhI] complexes
such as 1, 2, and 4. In fact, complex 6 shows the highest
initiation activity of all Rh compounds studied so far. The
(oxygenated) Rh species 3, 5, and 6 produce polymers of the
same high syndiotacticity as reported previously.[14]
Scheme 5. DFT calculated pathway for activation of 2-rhodaIIIoxetane
precursors to form the active (allyl–cod)RhIII OH species.
À
Proton transfer from an allylic position to the 2-rhoda-
oxetane oxygen atom is exergonic by 18 kcalmolÀ1 and has
a barrier of 27 kcalmolÀ1 (simplified cationic model in the gas
phase; Scheme 5). This transformation is experimentally
observed in the rearrangement from 5 to 6 and in related
reported reactions.[11,13] More importantly, b-hydroxy elimi-
nation from the cationic allyl-b-alkyl-hydroxide rhodium(III)
species is exergonic by approximately 5 kcalmolÀ1 and has an
accessible transition state barrier of 28 kcalmolÀ1.[15] Clearly,
oxidation
of
[(R’2C8H10)RhI]-type
complexes
to
[(R’2C8H10O)RhIII]-type species, followed by rearrangement
to [(R’2C8H9)RhIII OH] allyl compounds (R’ = H, Me) is an
effective pathway to engage carbene polymerization activity.
Carbene polymerization is also observed for non-oxidized
rhodium(I) diene complexes under strict anaerobic condi-
+
À
The carbene polymerization reaction using species 5 and 6
was further probed by high resolution ESIMS to obtain
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 1 – 6
ꢀ 2012 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
3
These are not the final page numbers!