5890 Jiang and Thayumanavan
Macromolecules, Vol. 38, No. 14, 2005
linked nanoparticles 6a are shown in Figure 3. Figure
3a and b represent the height (left) and phase (right)
images of the un-cross-linked copolymers 5a and cross-
linked nanoparticles 6a, respectively. From these im-
ages, one can clearly see that there are significant
differences between the un-cross-linked copolymer and
the cross-linked nanoparticles. The un-cross-linked
copolymer 5a exhibits “wormlike” structure, which could
be attributed to the aggregation of these polymers.
However, very different AFM images were observed
with the cross-linked nanoparticles (6a). The wormlike
structures in Figure 3a totally disappeared, and instead,
narrowly dispersed nanoparticles were obtained through
the cross-linking reaction. Note that the concentration
of the polymer and the speed of spin coating are
identical in both polymers. Similar behavior was also
obtained with copolymer 5b and cross-linked nanopar-
ticle 6b. These results also agree with those obtained
through DLS measurements, which further confirm that
an intramolecular cross-linking process is involved in
the formation of these nanoparticles.
Summary
A new class of functionalized polymeric nanoparticles
was successfully achieved. The nanoparticle is based on
a styrene-based copolymer backbone with amino moi-
eties as functional group displays. These particles were
achieved using an intramolecular collapse of the poly-
mer by carrying out a cross-linking reaction under high
dilution conditions. Analyses of the reactions using
NMR, GPC, DLS, and AFM confirm the intramolecular
cross-linking process. Our data also show that the size
of the nanoparticles can be tuned by controlling the
cross-linking density. Similarly, the number of amino
functionalities could also be tuned by varying the
monomer feed ratio. It is easy to imagine that such
control could also be achieved by controlling the molec-
ular weight. Finally, the functionalized intramolecular
cross-linked nanoparticles with amine groups were
reacted with trimethylacetyl chloride to demonstrate
that the amino moiety is available for further function-
alization. These nanoparticles have the potential to find
applications in a wide range of areas; an example of such
an application is drug delivery because of the easily
controllable size, cross-link density, and number of
functional groups.21 Investigations in this direction will
be part of the research efforts in our laboratories.
After the synthesis of the intramolecularly cross-
linked copolymers, 6 was reacted with acetyl chloride
in methanol to deprotect the Boc group to afford the
functionalized nanoparticle bearing amino functional-
ities 7, as shown in Scheme 3. The intramolecular cross-
linked nanoparticle 6 is soluble in common organic
solvents such as THF, DCM, and chloroform. However,
after the deprotection of the Boc group, the functional-
ized nanoparticle 7 was found to be insoluble in most
organic solvents except methanol. To confirm that the
deprotective reaction was achieved, we compared the
1H NMR of 7b with 6b (compare Figure 4a with Figure
2b). It is clear that the Boc group was removed because
the peak corresponding to tert-butyl moiety at around
Acknowledgment. We thank the U. S. Army Re-
search Office for partial support of this work. We also
thank the support from the NSF-MRSEC program of
the University of Massachusetts.
References and Notes
(1) Horn, D.; Rieger, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 4330.
(2) Xia, Y.; Gates, B.; Yin, Y.; Lu, Y. Adv. Mater. 2000, 12, 693.
(3) Liu, J.; Zhang, Q.; Remsen, E. E.; Wooley, K. L. Biomacro-
molecules 2001, 2, 362.
1
1.4 ppm is not present in the H NMR of 7b (Figure
4a).
(4) Niemeyer, C. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 4128.
(5) Katz, E.; Willner, I. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 6042.
(6) (a) Shipway, A. N.; Lahav, M.; Willner, I. Adv. Mater. 2000,
12, 993. (b) Lahav, M.; Heleg-Shabtai, V.; Wasserman, J.;
Katz, E.; Willner, I.; Durr, H.; Hu, Y.-Z.; Bossmann, S. H. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 11480. (c) Lahav, M.; Gabriel, T.;
Shipway, A. N.; Willner, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 258.
(7) Gittins, D. I.; Bethell, D.; Schiffrin D. J.; Nichols, R. J. Nature
2000, 408, 67.
(8) Kim, T. W.; Choo, D. C.; Shim, J. H.; Kang, S. O. Appl. Phys.
Lett. 2002, 80, 2168.
(9) Sweryda-Krawiec, B.; Cassagneau, T.; Fendler, J. H. Adv.
Mater. 1999, 11, 659.
As discussed above, we are interested in achieving
these amine-containing nanoparticles because they
provide a useful handle for further functionalization.
Due to the advent of amine-terminated dendrimers and
the fact that amino groups are ubiquitous in proteins,
methodologies for functionalization of amino groups in
macromolecules are numerous. To demonstrate that the
amino group in our polymeric nanoparticles can be
further functionalized, we stirred the nanoparticle 7
with triethylamine in chloroform overnight, then trim-
ethylacetyl chloride was added to this solution. Within
a short period of time, the suspension turned to a clear
solution. Precipitation of the polymer from this solution
using methanol afforded the pivaloyl-functionalized
nanoparticles 8. The functionalization was once again
confirmed by 1H NMR (Figure 4b). The appearance of a
new sharp peak at about 1.5 ppm is due to the
incorporation of the tert-butyl-containing pivaloyl group.
The incorporation efficiency of the pivaloyl group was
found be greater than 90%, as estimated by the relative
integration of the NMR peaks. This reaction sequence
provides the necessary proof-of-concept that the amine
functionalities in the polymer could be used for decorat-
ing the nanoparticle. The main difference between our
system here and others17-19 is that we have achieved
cross-linked nanoparticles that have handles for further
functionalization. Such a capability is certainly likely
to expand the repertoire of polymer nanoparticles in a
wide variety of applications.
(10) Feldheim, D. L.; Keating, C. D. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1998, 27, 1.
(11) (a) Katz, E.; Baron, R.; Willner, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
127, 4060. (b) Katz, E.; Sheeney-Haj-Ichia, L.; Basnar, B.;
Felner, I.; Willner, I. Langmuir 2004, 20, 9714. (c) Shipway,
A. N.; Willner, I. Chem. Commun. 2001, 20, 2035.
(12) Antonietti, M.; Kuang, A.; Smarsly, B.; Zhou, Y. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 4988.
(13) Hong, R.; Emrick, T.; Rotello, V. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 13572.
(14) Bartholome, C.; Beyou, E.; Bourgeat-Lami, E.; Chaumont, P.;
Zydowica, N. Macromolecules 2003, 36, 7946.
(15) Ki, C. D.; Emrick, T.; Chang, J. Y. Adv. Mater. 2005, 17, 230.
(16) Rusa, M.; Whitesell, J. K.; Fox, M. A. Macromolecules 2004,
37, 2766.
(17) Davankov, V. A.; Ilyin, M. M.; Tsyurupa, M. P.; Timofeeva,
G. I.; Dubrovina, L. V. Macromolecules 1996, 29, 8398.
(18) (a) Martin, J. E.; Eichinger, B. E. Macromolecules 1983, 16,
1345. (b) Martin, J. E.; Eichinger, B. E. Macromolecules 1983,
16, 1350.
(19) (a) Harth, E.; Van Horn, B.; Lee, V.; Germack, D.; Gonzales,
C.; Miller, R. D.; Hawker, C. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
8653. (b) Mecerreyes, D.; Lee, V.; Hawker, C. J.; Hedrick, J.