Chemical Papers
C11H7NO2, calcd. for. M + H = 186.0549 Da,
M + Na = 208.0369 Da, found: m/z 186.0554 [M + H]+,
208.0377 [M+Na]+.
(25 °C, 50 °C, and 70 °C) in anhydrous DMF, we found
that the most appropriate procedure for preparation of these
compounds was about 50 °C when anhydrous K2CO3 was
used as base. The lower reaction temperatures needed the
extended reaction time. The reaction time required about
30 h if the reaction was carried out at room temperature.
The higher reaction temperatures led to the decomposition
of products formed, and caused some problems for isolat-
ing and purifying the reaction products. These increasing
of reaction temperature led to formation of undefned by-
products or oily/tar substances having indefnite structures.
Other different solvents, such as DMSO, acetone, and
acetonitrile, were excellent solvents used for SN2 reaction
(Hamlin et al. 2018). Therefore, we had performed the opti-
into the corresponding N-propargyl isatin compounds. The
reaction of unsubstituted isatin 3a with propargyl bromide
was used as a model reaction for this purpose. Anhydrous
K2CO3 was used as a base. Applied heating conditions were
microwave (MW)-assisted heating conditions at power of
100 W, ultrasound-assisted heating conditions in water bath
5‑Chloro‑N‑propargylisatin (4f)
From 3f (1 mmol, 182 mg). Yellow solids. Yield 97.0%
(Procedure A), 99.3% (Procedure B), 90.2% (Procedure C).
IR (KBr), ν (cm–1): 3224, 3105, 3068, 2964, 1726, 1606,
1473, 1442, 1327, 1263, 1176, 1122, 1033, 825; 1H NMR
(δ, ppm): 7.76 (dd, J=2.0, 8.5 Hz, 1H, H-6), 7.63 (d, 1H,
J=2.0 Hz, H-4), 7.26 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 1H, H-7), 4.56 (d, 1H,
J = 2.5 Hz, N-CH2C≡CH), 3.34 (dd, J = 2.5, 5.0 Hz, 1H,
N-CH2C≡CH); 13C NMR (δ, ppm): 181.9 (C-3), 157.6
(C-2), 148.4 (C-7a), 137.5 (C-5), 128.4 (C-6), 124.5 (C-4),
119.5 (C-7), 113.3 (C-4a), 77.5 (N-CH2C≡CH), 75.6
(N-CH2C≡CH), 29.6 (N-CH2C≡CH); ESI-HRMS( +):
C11H635ClNO2/C11H637ClNO2, calcd. for. (M+H)/(M+2+
H)=220.0160/222.0130 Da, found: m/z 220.0182/222.0157
[M+H]+/[M+2+H]+.
Results and discussion
From Table 1, it’s showed that acetone (Entries 1, 5, and
9) was not appropriate as a solvent for propargylation of
isatins under applied reaction conditions as shown. Under
MW-assisted conditions, solvents such as acetonitrile (Entry
2) and DMSO (Entry 4) gave low yields (10.8% and 21.6%,
respectively), although the MW irradiation at power of
100 W at 50 °C was performed until 16 min and 18 min,
respectively. The highest yield was achieved (92.9%) when
DMF was used as a solvent with time only 5 min (Entry 3).
We found that the raising the power of microwave irradiation
(from 100 W up to 180 W) and the lengthening irradiation
time made the reaction mixture become the tar form com-
pletely (maybe, including reactants, product, and by-prod-
ucts). However, the levels of decomposition of the products
were diferent, as compounds 4a, 4b, 4e were decomposed
completely, while compound 4j, 4k was decomposed only a
part, and compounds 4c, 4d still obtained the product with
the moderate yields, however, they are black possibly due
to some tar.
The synthesis of N-propargyl isatins was performed
according to Scheme 1. Substituted isatins 3b–m were
Sandmeyer’s methodology through substituted α‐isoni-
cedure (Vine et al. 2007a). Propargyl derivatives of isatins
3a–m using propargyl bromide and anhydrous K2CO3 as a
base in appropriate solvents for SN2 reaction, such as DMF,
conditions (Scheme 1, Table 1). We applied our previous
(Thanh et al. 2016). The procedure for synthesis of N-pro-
propargyl bromide to yield the corresponding N-propar-
gyl isatins. However, the presence of terminal triple bond
caused these reaction conditions to be applied with a few
improvements.
Under conventional heating conditions at 50 °C in water
bath, both solvents, acetone (Entry 6) and DMF (Entry 7),
gave the high yields (91.9% for acetone v.s. 92.9% for DMF)
with same reaction times (for 2 h). Solvent DMSO (Entry 8)
gave lower yield (86.5%) with longer reaction time (2.5 h).
Ultrasonic methods proved to be unsuitable for this reac-
tion, in addition to acetone (to give unwanted byproduct),
both solvents, acetonitrile (Entry 10) and DMF (Entry 11),
gave the same yields (75.7% vs 71.4%, respectively), but
acetonitrile was the better option, since the higher yield
was achieved for shorter reaction time (3 h vs 11 h for each
By initially investigating the reaction of unsubstituted
isatin 3a with propargyl bromide was used as a model reac-
tion with propargyl bromide in the presence of two bases
(NaH and anhydrous K2CO3) and at diferent temperatures
1 3