3790 Organometallics, Vol. 24, No. 15, 2005
Ta´rka´nyi and Dea´k
1
6), H-119Sn-HMQC experiments revealed large 119Sn
It is out of the scope of this paper to further describe
each contribution that determines the relative rate of
the dismutation for the various coordinating solvents
(CD3OD, DMSO-d6, and C5D5N). The fine balance
between Lewis basicity, steric, and byproduct (Me4Sn)
solvation factors in methylated solvents (e.g., DMSO)
is probably responsible for the fastest reaction rates
found in DMSO (Table 1).
shift changes, which makes this technique useful for the
characterization of weak transient complexes of orga-
notins in dilute solutions. The values δcomplex (-374.4
ppm) and ∆δ∞ (+215.3 ppm) determined by nonlinear
fitting are also important structural parameters proving
a CN ) 6 to 7 coordination change around the central
tin. Similar titration experiments for diorganotins have
not yet been reported in the literature.
Proposed Mechanism of the Dismutation Reac-
tion. Because the solution structures of 1m and 2m are
now well characterized, we arrive at setting up a
proposed mechanism for the dismutation process. The
spectroscopic differences for 1m between measurements
in coordinating and noncoordinating solvents (Tables 2
and 3) can be interpreted on the basis of a 1m (cis-TBP)
f 1m* (trans-TBP) conformational change rather than
according to a 1m (cis-TBP) f 1t (trans-TBP) preorga-
nization model. The solute-solute interactions between
the monomeric 1m species, which only dominate at low
temperatures in noncoordinating solvents, are replaced
by solute-solvent interactions at room temperature in
the presence of N- or O-donors in the solvent bulk. As
a result, the three methyl carbons of 1m are pushed by
the O- or N-donor solvent (S) into a single plane, forcing
the cupferronato anion to coordinate (from the opposite
direction) rather as a monodendate ligand (1m* in Chart
1). Similar solvent effects were described for other
trimethyltin derivatives with monodendate ligands.37
The solvent-perturbed conformational equilibrium for
Conclusions
We have proven that the supramolecular structures
1t and 2d are predominantly monomeric (1m and 2m) in
solution at room temperature. Both monomeric struc-
tures underwent a cis-trans conformational exchange
that is fast on the chemical shift time scales. In
noncoordinating solvents (CDCl3, CD2Cl2) the domi-
nance of the cis-TBP and cis-Oh conformations was
characteristic for 1m and 2m, respectively. Coordinating
solvents (DMSO, pyridine, and methanol) increased the
population of the trans-states, increasing the coordina-
tion number of the central tins. Solvent-induced con-
formational change was held responsible for a unique
demethylation process in which 1m was converted into
2m, yielding the byproduct Me4Sn. Such transformations
may explain why no trimethyltin(IV) derivatives of five-
membered bidendate anions (cupferronates, kojates,
tropolonates) were ever reported as being crystallized
from methanol or from other coordinating solvents.
1H NMR kinetic experiments carried out in the
spectrometer have proven that the dismutation process
followed a second-order 2 A f B + C type kinetics. The
rate of the reaction increased with the coordinating
strength of the solvent, but the kinetic model has not
changed. It seems that the dismutation of 1t in solution
is initiated by intermolecular 1m + 1m* collisions rather
than by intramolecular rearrangements within the
supramolecule 1t. The product 2m was stabilized by the
formation of specific heptacoordinated solute-solvent
complexes in Lewis base solvents 2m*, which underwent
no further dismutation. The underlying cis-Oh f trans-
Oh conformational equilibrium was verified by the
calculation of the Me-Sn-Me angles on the basis of
J-coupling data in the absence and in the presence of
O- or N-donor ligands. Additionally, the stability of the
solute-solvent complexes of 2m with pyridine and 4,4′-
bipyridyl was characterized by 119Sn NMR titration
experiments.
1
m is the most plausible explanation for the mechanism
of the dismutation reaction. Its role is most likely to
initiate a process leading to a nucleophilic substitution
in which the cupferronato anion is kept in a monoden-
date transition state whose lifetime is long enough for
the proper ligand exchanges to take place via bimolecu-
lar collisions. This is in agreement with the fact that
the dismutation reaction proceeded at slightly faster
rates in DMSO when repeated with lower [A]0 initial
concentrations of 1m (k ) 1.0671 × 10-4 ( 1.3 × 10-7
L‚mol-1‚s-1 at [A]0 ) 0.110 mol/l, and k ) 1.6538 × 10-4
( 3.7 × 10-7 L‚mol-1‚s-1 at [A]0 ) 0.030 mol/L, see Table
1). This finding has modified our understanding of the
dismutation kinetics, as we previously assumed that a
relatively high initial concentration of 1m is a prereq-
uisite of the transformation. Because titrations have
shown that 2m is stabilized by solvent complexation, we
summarize the role of solvent activation according to
the following:
Low-temperature 1H and 119Sn NMR experiments in
noncoordinating solvents revealed the first example of
a preorganization process toward a solvated 20-mem-
bered macrocyclic structure in 1t. The thermodynamic
properties of the preorganization process in comparison
with those of other triorganotin(IV) derivatives will be
published elsewhere.
Compound 3m prepared as a standard for diffusion
experiments showed neither solute-solute or solute-
solvent complexation behavior nor spontaneous dis-
mutation reaction in any solvents.
solvent
1m
y
z 1m*
(I)
1m + 1m* f 2m* + Me4Sn
(II)
solvent
2m* y
z 2m
(III)
Both solvent-coordinated complexes 1m* and 2m* are
abundant because of the omnipresent O- or N-donors
in the bulk solvent. Processes I and III are very fast
and reversible. The rate-determining step is then pro-
cess II (as confirmed by the kinetic data), and conse-
quently the order of the reaction remains 2.
Experimental Section
NMR Experiments. NMR spectra were recorded on a 400
MHz (for 1H) Varian INOVA spectrometer equipped with a
Varian 5 mm 1H-19F/{15N-31P} Z-gradient indirect detection
(37) Bolles, T. F.; Drago, R. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88, 5730-
5734.