A. Bourderioux et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 46 (2005) 6071–6074
6073
methods in the absence of a nitrogen indolic protective
group. These implied the use of carboxylic acids, and
the formation of an acylium ion by Friedel–Crafts
related reactions. So we oxidized the aldehyde function
of 3 into a carboxylic acid with an aqueous solution of
sodium chlorite (2.2 equiv) and sulfamic acid (8.1 equiv)
between 7 and 10 ꢁC.12 After only 1 min the starting
material completely disappeared and the reaction affor-
ded the desired carboxylic acid 4 in 57% yield. If the
reaction was performed at 6 ꢁC by accurate control of
the temperature during the oxidant addition, the acid
4 was obtained in 81% yield. An increase of the time
to 5min led only to degradation. Numerous variations
indicated that these conditions were extremely efficient,
but extremely time and concentration sensitive.
with no significant results. The same reaction was car-
ried out using hexamethylditin (in spite of its greater
toxicity). Indeed, whereas the use of Sn2Bu6 proved to
be quite ineffective, Nicolaou reported the achieving of
71% yield shifting from Bu to Me.20 In our hand, after
a reaction time of 2 h, compound 8 was obtained in
97% yield (entry 4).
The Stille procedure between the bromo compound
1 and the stannylated derivative 7 (1.2 equiv) was
performed with PdCl2(PPh3)2 as a catalyst in refluxing
dioxane in the presence of CuI. After 8 h only 12% of
the desired compound 9 was obtained (entry 5). Increas-
ing the amount of 7 to 1.5equiv reduced the reaction
time to 6 h and the yield increased to 74%. Under similar
conditions, the trimethyltin derivative 8 led to the same
product 9 after 5h in 70% yield (entries 6 and 7). The
ester was saponified using aqueous KOH in acetone at
room temperature during 5h. Then, the acidification
step led, after 12 additional hours, to the maleic com-
pound 10 in 98% yield without any difficulty. The intra-
molecular cyclization corresponding to the final step was
performed with BF3ÆEt2O during 20 h to afford the sec-
ond targeted analog 11 in 70% yield. During the course
of this cyclization, no side reaction was observed in spite
of the presence of the anhydride function.
Following route A, the ring closure leading to the
central seven-membered cycle was the next goal. As
described in the literature, we chose to perform it
through an electrophilic cyclization. Common reagents
for such a reaction were AlCl3 or phosphoric reactants
such as PPSE.13–15 Milder conditions involved the use
of an anhydride in presence of BF3ÆEt2O.16–18 For our
own part, we carried out the reaction in the presence
of a large excess of BF3ÆEt2O as a Lewis acid in refluxing
DCE without any pre-activation of the carboxylic acid
function.16–18 After 12 h, compound 5 was isolated in
66% yield along with numerous nonidentified by-prod-
ucts. The yield could be increased to 89% by lowering
the reaction time to 5h 30 min. After completion of
the reaction, an aqueous treatment and extractions led
directly to pure 5. To our knowledge, it is the first exam-
ple of such an acylation using BF3ÆEt2O without an ind-
olic protection.
In this paper we described two different ways to obtain
the N-methylmaleimide compound 5 and the anhydride
11 in three steps from compound 1. Route A, which
included a Suzuki reaction led to 5 in 52% overall yield.21
Route B involving a Stille reaction afforded the anhydride
11 in 51% global yield. The two routes were quite similar
but way B implied the preparation of a trimethyltin deriv-
ative by an additional step. The biological evaluation of 5
and 11 as kinase inhibitors are being currently performed.
Further investigations to explore the reactivity of the
maleimide and anhydride functions and a generalization
of the synthetic sequence to substituted indoles are
already in progress and will be reported in due course.
Considering that the Suzuki reaction and the highly sen-
sitive oxidation to access compound 4 were limiting
steps to scale up the synthesis, route B was designed.
The 2-tributylstannyl and trimethylstannyl derivatives
7 and 8 were reported as efficient reagents in such a
strategy.19,20 Starting from the methyl-2-bromo benzo-
ate 6, compound 7 could be prepared using Pd(PPh3)4
as a catalyst. Unfortunately, the yield was limited to
41% after 21 h using a low amount of palladium catalyst
(0.008 equiv). Surprisingly, increasing the amount of
catalyst to 0.1 equiv did not decrease the reaction time.
After 23 h, the yield of compound 5 was slightly
increased to 47% (Scheme 2, entry 3).
Acknowledgements
´
ˆ
´
We thank Canceropole Grand Ouest, the Region Centre
and the Association pour la Recherche contre le Cancer
(ARC) for the financial support of this work.
In order to enhance the yield, we decided to explore
some other conditions by slight step by step modifica-
tions. So we used PdCl2(PPh3)2 as a catalyst, in the pres-
ence or absence of LiCl in refluxing THF or dioxane
References and notes
1. (a) Prudhomme, M. Curr. Med. Chem. Anti Cancer Agents
2004, 6, 509–521; (b) Kno¨lker, H.-J.; Reddy, K. R. Chem.
Rev. 2002, 102, 4303–4427.
2. Sanchez-Martinez, C.; Shih, C.; Faul, M. M.; Zhu, G.;
Paal, M.; Somoza, C.; Li, T.; Kumrich, C. A.; Winneroski,
L. L.; Xun, Z.; Brooks, H. B.; Patel, B. K. R.; Schultz, R.
M.; DeHahn, T. B.; Spencer, C. D.; Watkins, E.;
Considine, S. A.; Dempsey, J. A.; Ogg, C. A.; Campbell,
R. M.; Anderson, B. A.; Wagner, J. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett. 2003, 13, 3835–3839.
CO2Me
SnR3
CO2Me
Br
iv
7 R = Bu
8 R = Me
6
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: for 7: Pd(PPh3)4 (0.1 equiv),
Sn2Bu6 (1.2 equiv), tol., rflx., 23 h, 47%, for 8 Sn2Me6 (1.2 equiv), 2 h,
97%.
3. Gingrich, D. E.; Reddy, D. R.; Iqbal, M. A.; Singh, J.;
Aimone, L. D.; Angeles, T. S.; Albom, M.; Yang, S.; Ator,
M. A.; Meyer, S. L.; Robinson, C.; Ruggeri, B. A.;