C. D. Beadle et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 15 (2005) 4432–4437
4437
2. Southwick, S. M.; Bremner, J. D.; Rasmusson, A.;
Morgan, C. A.; Arnsten, A.; Charney, D. S. Biol.
Psychiatry 1999, 46, 1192.
3. Bymaster, F. P.; Katner, J. S.; Nelson, D. L.; Hemrick-
Luecke, S. K.; Threlkeld, P. G.; Heiligenstein, J. H.;
Morin, S. M.; Gehlert, D. R.; Perry, K. W. Neuropsycho-
pharmacology 2002, 27, 699.
Table 3 shows the effect of steric bulk in the 3-position
within a series of straight chain alkyl analogues. Replac-
ing the hydrogen in the 3-position 11 with a methyl sub-
stituent 19 resulted in a 4-fold drop in NET activity.
However, increasing the size of the alkyl substituent to
ethyl 34 and n-propyl 35 brought the NET activity back,
with these analogues being comparable to 11 (R@H).
This approach proved successful in increasing the over-
all lipophilic nature of the molecules with the n-propyl
analogue 35 having a predicted logD of 1.117
4. Scates, A. C.; Doraiswamy, P. M. Ann. Pharmacother.
2000, 34, 1302.
5. Schatzberg, A. F. J. Clin. Psychiatry 2003, 64, 30.
6. Boot, J. R.; Brace, G.; Delatour, C. L.; Dezutter, N.;
Fairhurst, J.; Findlay, J.; Gallagher, P. T.; Hoes, I.;
Mahadevan, S.; Mitchell, S. N.; Rathmell, R. E.; Rich-
ards, S. J.; Simmonds, R. G.; Wallace, L.; Whatton, M. A.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 5395.
7. A related series of 5-membered ring analogues have been
described: Canas-Rodriguez, A.; Leeming, P. R. J. Med.
Chem. 1972, 15, 762.
With the increase in potency obtained with analogues
containing a 4-methyl substituent on the southern N-ar-
omatic rings 25 and 28, a combination with the previ-
ously described 3-alkyl SAR was attempted (Table 4).
Potent NET activity was observed with the ethyl 36,
n-propyl 37, and n-butyl analogues 39, although this
combination did not give an additive boost to activity
versus the corresponding unsubstituted analogues 34
and 35. In this series of compounds, the branched iso-
propyl analogue 38 was not tolerated. Halogen substitu-
tion in the 6-position of the western N-aromatic ring 40
and 41 was tolerated. As before, the combination SAR
failed to be additive with analogues 42 and 43 possessing
moderate NET activity.
8. Klapars, A.; Antilla, J. C.; Huang, X.; Buchwald, S. L.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 7727.
9. During the course of this work, a microwave-assisted
Goldberg reaction was reported: Lange, J. H. M.;
Hofmeyer, L. J. F.; Hout, F. A. S.; Osnabrug, S. J. M.;
Verveer, P. C.; Kruse, C. G.; Feenstra, R. W. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2002, 43, 1101.
10. For full experimental details see: Camp, N. P.; Penariol,
R.; Beadle, C. D. WO2004096773..
11. Couture, A.; Deniau, E.; Grandclaudon, P.; Lebrun, S.
Synlett 1997, 12, 1475.
12. Kikugawa, Y.; Matsumoto, K.; Mitsui, K.; Sakamoto, T.
J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Comm. 1992, 12, 921.
5. Summary
13. NET assay: Gobel, J.; Saussy, D. L.; Goetz, A. J.
Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods 1999, 42, 237; SERT/DAT
assay: Ramamoorthy, S.; Giovanetti, E.; Qian, Y.; Blakely,
R. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 2458.
14. Bymaster, F. P.; Beedle, E. E.; Findlay, J.; Gallagher, P.
T.; Krushinski, J. H.; Mitchell, S.; Robertson, D. W.;
Thompson, D. C.; Wallace, L.; Wong, D. T. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 2003, 13, 4477.
A novel series of 1-aryl-3,4-dihydro-1H-quinolin-2-ones
has been discovered as potent and selective NET reup-
take inhibitors. Efficient syntheses of these analogues
have been developed, allowing for the preparation of
multi-gram quantities of final products and advanced
intermediates for SAR determination. The strategy to
increase the lipophilic nature of this series was success-
ful (measured logD increased from À0.48 for the origi-
nal hit 11a to 1.8 for analogue 43). There were
limitations within this SAR and often increasing lipo-
philicity within this series resulted in a reduction in
NET activity. However, substitution in the 3-position
with straight chain alkyl groups provided molecules
with both increased lipophilic character and good
NET potency.
15. 10a was obtained after separation by chiral HPLC on a
Chiralcel-OJ(3624) semi-preparative column using
a
gradient of 50% heptane, 50% isopropanol, and 0.2%
dimethylethyl amine as eluent (e.e. 100%), sample
concentration 0.5 mg/ml 1.0 ml/min, sample solvent:
50% heptane, 50% isopropanol, and 0.2 dimethylethyl
amine, Rt = 18.39 min. 10b was obtained after separation
by chiral HPLC using the same conditions;
Rt = 22.02 min (e.e. 98%). 11a was obtained after
separation by chiral HPLC on a Chiralcel-OJ(3624)
semi-preparative column using a gradient of 85% hep-
tane, 15% ethanol, and 0.2% dimethylethyl amine as
eluent (e.e. 96%), sample concentration 0.2 mg/ml 1.0 ml/
min, sample solvent: 50% heptane, 50% isopropanol,
Rt = 18.6 min. 11b was obtained after separation by
chiral HPLC using the same conditions; Rt = 20.79 min
(e.e. 91%).
Acknowledgments
We thank the analytical and DCSG groups at Erl Wood
for providing support, and Dr. Peter Gallagher and
Anne Marie Welsh for helpful advice.
16. Gulyaeva, N.; Zaslavsky, A.; Lechner, P.; Chlenov, M.;
McConnell, O.; Chait, A.; Kipnis, V.; Zaslavsky, B. Eur.
J. Med. Chem. 2003, 38, 391.
References and notes
1. Bymaster, F. P.; McNamara, R. K.; Tran, P. V. Exp.
Opin. Invest. Drugs 2003, 12, 531.
17. Predicted logDÕs were determined using the ACDLabs
software package version 7.0.