T. Shigehiro et al. / Tetrahedron Letters xxx (2014) xxx–xxx
3
Table 1
UV–vis absorption (10
l
M) and PL (1
l
M) data of 1a–g and Pt-1e–g in CH2Cl2 at rt
abs/L molꢀ1 cmꢀ1
Compound
kabs/nm (
e
)
Ega/eV
kPL (kex)/nm
UPL
s
PL/ns (v2
NDb
)
1a
1b
287 (47900), 363 (12600), 381 (12600)
297 (47900), 382 (13200)
3.11
2.73
2.63
2.52
2.48
2.45
2.42
2.28
2.21
2.20
472 (301)
505 (383)
522 (420)
522 (451)
569 (451)
579 (450)
592 (452)
623 (450)
650 (469)
655 (470)
0.009
0.10
0.68
0.91
0.84
0.49
0.78
0.45
0.066
0.24
1.79 (1.07)
11.2 (1.08)
11.5 (1.09)
13.7 (1.08)
9.34 (1.02)
9.61 (1.00)
11.2 (1.00)
4.43 (1.06)
5.57 (1.02)
1c
1d
1e
1f
301 (66100), 384 (11200), 422 (6500)
311 (56000), 395 (12600), 440 (10200)
318 (69200), 387 (9300), 441 (7600)
315 (75900), 386 (12000), 443 (9300)
344 (166000), 448 (18200)
1g
Pt-1e
Pt-1f
Pt-1g
318 (79400), 407 (11200), 475 (7800)
314 (77600), 404 (12600), 475 (8300)
346 (147900), 493 (11200)
a
Eg values were estimated from the onset of UV–vis absorption spectra.
Not determined due to too weak emission.
b
Table 2
PL data (1
l
M) of 1e in various solvents
Solvent (ET(30))
kPL (nm)
UPL
kr
(l
sꢀ1
)
knr (l )
sꢀ1
Hexane (31.0)
Toluene (33.9)
Acetone (42.2)
DMSO (45.1)
524
538
572
590
0.74
0.99
0.99
0.99
79.2
104
68.3
72.8
27.8
1.05
0.690
0.735
the dppz-based chromophores. PL profiles of 1e–g in various sol-
vents are shown in Figure S4 and Table S3 (Supplementary data),
and the data for 1e are excerpted in Table 2 from Table S3. As
the polarity of the solvent increased, positive solvatochromism of
PL was observed for each of 1e–g. For example, 1e exhibited drastic
PL spectral changes when the solvent polarity was varied: in hex-
ane, 1e exhibited green emission at 524 nm, whereas orange emis-
sion was observed at 590 nm in DMSO. On the other hand, the
absorption spectra were almost unchanged (See Supplementary
data, Fig. S4), indicating that these compounds are less polarized
in the ground state. Thus, the positive solvatochromism observed
for PL indicates that the present ICT-type chromophores are highly
polarized in the excited states. Indeed, the differences in dipole
Figure 4. Electron distributions of the HOMO and LUMO for 1e and 1f calculated at
the B3LYP/6-31G⁄ level of theory (implemented in Gaussian 09 package27). The
calculations were performed on the model structures in which the alkyl substit-
uents are replaced by methyl groups.
moments between the excited states and the ground ones (
were investigated for 1e–g by employing the Lippert–Mataga
plot28,29 (See Supplementary data, Fig. S5), and the
s for 1e–g
Dl)
1a
1b
1c
1d
1e
1f
D
l
were estimated to be 12.3, 14.6, and 16.8 D, respectively. This
result clearly shows that the increase in the electron-donating abil-
ity of the side-arms made the excited state more polarized. In
terms of UPL, a strong emission (UPL P 0.74) was observed for
1e, regardless of solvent polarities. In general, the increase in sol-
vent polarities made ICT-type chromophores less emissive because
significant facilitation of nonradiative decay was caused by solvent
relaxation.30,31 For 1e, however, the increase in the nonradiative
decay rate knr was suppressed even in highly polar solvents such
as acetone and DMSO (Table 2). Thus, 1e was still highly emissive
in these solvents (UPL = 0.99). The excellent luminescent properties
of 1e make itself potentially applicable to a fluorescent probe in
polar media.32 In the case of 1f, the nonradiative decay was facili-
tated with the increase in solvent polarity, as shown in Table S3.
1g
400
500
600
700
800
Wavelength (nm)
Figure 5. PL spectra (1
l
M) of 1a–g in CH2Cl2 at rt.
range at 522–592 nm. The introduction of biphenylyl (1c) and
phenylethynyl (1d) groups gave rise to green emission showing
the kPLs at 522 nm. Upon comparison between 1c and 1e, suppress-
ing the bond rotation of the biphenyl by the methano bridge led to
Taking the
Dl value of 1f into consideration, one can see that
the deteriorated PL of 1f in polar solvents is attributed to the more
polarized excited state in comparison with that of 1e. Thus, 1f
should be susceptible to emission quenching by solvent relaxation.
On the other hand, 1g exhibited relatively intense emission even in
a red shift of ca. 50 nm due to
p-extension of the side-arms. As
shown in 1g, further extension of the side-arms by additional
fluorenyl groups gave rise to a red shift at 592 nm, emitting strong
orange PL (UPL = 0.78). Hence, as is expected from the optical
properties, the increase in electron-donating ability of the
side-arms yielded red-shifted emission. It is worthy to note that
polar solvents despite the large
Dl value. Although the detailed
mechanism is still unclear, we found that the fluorene-derived
side-arms are effective to obtain highly emissive dppz derivatives
in wide range of solvents.
Taking advantage of metal-chelation ability of the diimine site,
the platinum(II) complexes Pt-1e–g were also prepared. These
the remarkable ICT is essential to obtain an enlarged UPL
.
ICT-based luminescence is often affected by solvent polarity.30–32
So, the solvent effect on the emission behavior was investigated for