G. Binot, S. Z. Zard / Tetrahedron Letters 46 (2005) 7503–7506
7505
References and notes
1. Jones, G. In Comprehensive Heterocyclic Chemistry II;
Katritzky, A. R., Rees, C. W., Scriven, E. F. V., Eds.;
Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1996; p 167.
2. Patel, M.; McHugh, R. J.; Cordova, B. C.; Klabe, R. M.;
Bacheler, L. T.; Erickson-Viitanen, S.; Rodgers, J. D.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2001, 11, 1943.
3. (a) Jones, G. In Comprehensive Heterocyclic Chemistry;
Boulton, A. J., McKillop, A., Eds.; Pergamon Press:
Oxford, 1984; Vol. 2, Chapter 8; (b) Li, K.; Foresee, L. N.;
Tunge, J. A. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 2881; (c) Kadnikov,
D. V.; Larock, R. C. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 6772, and
references cited therein.
4. Marcaccini, S.; Pepino, R.; Pozo, M. C.; Basurto, S.;
´
Garcıa-Valverde, M.; Torroba, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004,
45, 3999.
5. (a) Manley, P. J.; Bilodeau, M. T. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 2433;
(b) Fujita, K.; Takahashi, Y.; Owaki, M.; Yamamoto, K.;
Yamaguchi, R. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 2785.
6. For an important exception, see: (a) Wu, Y. L.; Chuang,
C. P.; Lin, P. Y. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 6209; For recent
examples of ring closures onto aromatic rings leading to
six-membered rings, see: (b) Harrowven, D. C.; Wood-
cock, T.; Howes, P. D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44,
3899; (c) Bhowmik, D. R.; Venkateswaran, R. V. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 1999, 40, 7431, and references cited therein.
7. (a) Zard, S. Z. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1997, 36, 672; (b)
Zard, S. Z. In Radicals in Organic Synthesis; Renaud, P.,
Sibi, M. P., Eds.; Wiley-VCH, 2001; pp 90–108.
8. Binot, G.; Quiclet-Sire, B.; Saleh, T.; Zard, S. Z. Synlett
2003, 382.
9. (a) Yamasaki, R.; Tanatani, A.; Azumaya, I.; Saito, S.;
Yamaguchi, K.; Kagechika, H. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1265,
and references cited therein; (b) Musa, O. M.; Horner, J.;
Newcomb, M. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 1022; (c) Stork, G.;
Mah, R. Heterocycles 1989, 28, 723.
Scheme 4. Reagents and conditions: (a) lauroyl peroxide, DCE, reflux,
lauroyl peroxide, PhCl, reflux.
10. (a) Cholleton, N.; Zard, S. Z. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39,
7295; (b) Quiclet-Sire, B.; Zard, S. Z. Chem. Commun.
2002, 2306.
11. After some experimentation, the best protecting group for
the transformation was found to be a methoxycarbonyl
this corresponds to an average of 60–70% yield per step)
as shown in Scheme 4.14 Once again the main side prod-
uct found in the crude mixture (5–16%) is the reduced
uncyclised intermediate adduct corresponding to 9 in
Scheme 2. The slightly higher yields observed when elec-
tron-withdrawing groups are present on the aromatic
ring can be ascribed to the moderate nucleophilic char-
acter of the cyclising radical.
group, giving xanthate
2 in 43% overall yield on
the protection/conjugate addition/deprotection/sequence,
starting from the crotonanilide.
12. Prepared by reaction of commercial anilines and vinylace-
tyl chloride in dichloromethane at rt.
13. For a recent review on the use of fluorine in the life science
industry, see: Maienfisch, P.; Hall, R. G. Chimia 2004, 58,
93.
In conclusion, we have developed a convergent and
short access to 4-substituted 3,4-dihydroquinolin-
2(1H)-ones. These deceptively simple-looking com-
pounds would be quite tedious and difficult to make
by classical methods. The starting materials and
reagents in the present route are cheap and readily avail-
able; the reaction conditions are mild and the process is
compatible with a broad spectrum of functional groups,
both on the aromatic ring and the xanthate, allowing
infinite variations on the structures. But perhaps most
importantly, we have documented the first and probably
quite rare instance where the radical cyclisation of a sec-
ondary amide is more efficient than that of the corre-
sponding fully substituted imide analogue.
14. The preparation of 8h is representative: a solution of
amide 5d (370 mg, 2.07 mmol) and xanthate 6b (300 mg,
1.36 mmol) in 1,2-dichloroethane (3 mL) was refluxed for
15 min under a slow stream of argon before DLP was
added (27 mg) from the top of the condenser. Portions of
DLP (16 mg) were added every 90 min until complete
consumption of the starting xanthate. The solvent was
evaporated and replaced by chlorobenzene (15 mL). The
mixture was then refluxed for 15 min under argon before
adding portions of DLP (110 mg) every 30 min until
complete disappearance of the intermediate (TLC moni-
toring). Concentration under reduced pressure afforded a
yellow residue, which was submitted to flash silica gel
chromatography eluting with petroleum ether/EtOAc (10–
40%) to give 8h (138 mg, 36%) as a white solid, mp 156–
157 °C. IR (CCl4, cmÀ1) mmax: 3200, 1706, 1682. 1H NMR
(400 MHz, CDCl3): d 1.13 (9H, s), 1.75–1.91 (2H, m),
2.48–2.54 (3H, m), 2.74 (1H, dd, 2J = 16.4 Hz,
3J = 6.0 Hz), 2.95–3.00 (1H, m), 6.82–6.90 (3H, m), 9.74
Acknowledgements
One of us (G.B.) gratefully acknowledges generous
financial support from the DGA.