COMMUNICATION
Figure 2. Comparison of molecular orbital energy level diagrams (a-c
numbering is identical with that in Figure 1; only d orbitals are shown).
c) were different from each other and from that of the
molecule present in 1 (Figure 1, top, conformer a). Density
functional theory (DFT) calculation of these conformers
showed an interesting perturbation in the molecular orbital
energy level (Figure 2). The relative energy levels of all d
orbitals change drastically in the three conformers, highlight-
ing the influence of the disposition of a peripheral ligand
(flipping of the cyclohexyl ring). The electrostatic surface
potentials of all three conformers differ,10 suggesting the
possibility of solvent interaction with 1, which may affect
the conformation of the molecule in such a way as to lower
Figure 1. Conformer of the anion of 1 (top, a), conformers of the anion
of 2 (top, b and c), and the structure of the anion of 3 (bottom) (see the
Supporting Information for ORTEP plots). Color code: C, gray; N, blue;
Fe, brown; I, pink.
solvent coordination, which could have been responsible for
2
2
the energy of the dx -y orbital, resulting in the change in
the spin state in solution. Iron incorporation in porphyrin
and porphyrinogen does not follow the same chemistry. For
porphyrin, its deviation from planarity with out-of-plane
displacement of Fe(III) in pentacoordination and planar
tetracoordination of Fe(II) and their relative stability even
in an aqueous medium suggested that protonated porphyrin
does not possess any extra stability. The metalation and
demetalation of porphyrin are generally reversible and pH-
dependent. In contrast, for porphyrinogen its ligational role
toward metal ions is centered on likelihood of the extremely
basic tetralithiated [L′′]4- ion, which is an avid proton
scavenger, to change to the stable H4L′′. [L′′]4- is not
reducing but a good chelating ligand. The addition of 1 equiv
of anhydrous FeCl2 or FeCl3 to it resulted in immediate
complexation to generate the respective complex anion. The
addition of 2,2′-bipyridine or [Bu4N]3[Fe(III)(CN)6] into a
solution of [L′′FeII]2- did not show any color changes,
confirming the absence of any free or dissociable Fe(II) ion.
Similarly, in the case of [L′′FeIII]2-, the addition of [Bu4N]3H-
[FeII(CN)6] did not produce any prussian blue precipitate,
suggesting that the complexed Fe(III) is not dissociated
readily. However, both of the anions are susceptible to
hydrolysis (Scheme 1). For the formation of [L′′FeIII]- in
the presence of excess FeCl2, the reaction involves two redox
couples. In THF, the cyclic voltammetric response of the
[L′′FeIII]-/[L′′FeII]2- couple is irreversible with Epa at
-1.05V vs Ag/AgCl. In the same solvent, the electrochemi-
cal response of FeCl2 showed an irreversible redox response
2
2
altering the energy of the dx -y orbital, resulting in the change
in the spin state. Recrystallization of 1 in DCM in the
presence of pyridine retained the molecular structure of 1
with the presence of pyridine in the lattice to yield Et4N-
[L′′FeIII]‚DCM0.5Py1.5 (2). However, the conformational
orientation of the molecules in 2 differed in comparison to
that found in 1. In the asymmetric unit of 2, the orientations
of the two molecules (see Figure 1, top, conformers b and
(7) Crystal data for Et4N[L′′FeIII]‚3DCM (1): a ) 13.640(5) Å, b )
18.548(5) Å, c ) 20.750(5) Å, R ) 90(5)°, â ) 90(5)°, γ ) 90(5)°,
V ) 5250 Å3, orthorhombic, space group P222, Z ) 4, Dcalc ) 1.298
g cm-3, T ) 100 K. Of a total of 35 396 reflections collected, 12 997
were independent (Rint ) 0.049). Final R1 ) 0.065 [I > 2σ(I)], wR2
) 0.1514, GOF ) 0.999. Crystal data for Et4N[L′′FeIII]‚DCM0.5Py1.5
(2): a ) 11.696(5) Å, b ) 16.749 (5) Å, c ) 24.767(5) Å, R ) 90.663-
(3)°, â ) 96.540(5)°, γ ) 95.869(5)°, V ) 4794 Å3, triclinic, space
group P1h, Z ) 2, Dcalc ) 1.266 g cm-3, T ) 100 K. Of a total of
32 274 reflections collected, 22 809 were independent (Rint ) 0.047);
GOF ) 1.041, final R1 ) 0.094 [I > 2σ(I)], wR2 ) 0.205. Crystal
data for [L′′∆∆FeIII][I3‚I2+‚I3-] (3): a ) 11.742(5) Å, b ) 13.001(5)
Å, c ) 17.686(5) Å, R ) 85.904(5)°, â ) 72.965(5)°, γ ) 72.100-
(5)°, V ) 2456 Å3, triclinic, space group P1h, Z ) 2, Dcalc ) 2.297 g
cm-3, T ) 100 K. Of a total of 16 338 reflections collected, 11 658
were independent (Rint ) 0.017); GOF ) 1.067, final R1 ) 0.0746 [I
> 2σ(I)], wR2 ) 0.2199.
(8) Evans, D. F. J. Chem. Soc. 1959, 2003.
(9) We follow the synthesis of Fe(III) containing three other porphyrinogen
(octaethyl, octamethyl, and methylethyl substituted) using the present
synthetic procedure to isolate deep red tetraethylammonium salt of
the corresponding iron(III) porphyrinogen. For the octaethylporphy-
rinogen, Floriani et al. reported a solid-state magnetic moment value
of 4.35 µB at 293 K.3 The same complex synthesized by the present
method showed the room-temperature magnetic moment 4.35 µB,
identical to that. However, in DMF, its magnetic behavior changed to
that of high-spin Fe(III), showing µeff ) 6.2 µB. For iron(III)
butylporphyrinogen, the solid-state magnetic moment value was µeff
) 4.05 µB (SQUID measurement), which followed Curie-Weiss law
(µeff ) 3.8 µB at 6 K). Upon measurement in DMF, it changes to a
high-spin type, showing µeff ) 6.1 µB.
(10) Calculations were carried out with the CAChe 5.03 program of Fujitsu
Ltd., using a ZINDO semiempirical method.
7700 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 44, No. 22, 2005