L.-Q. Sun et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 14 (2004) 1197–1200
1199
Modifications to the left hand aromatic moiety were
somewhat limited but included the replacement of the
ethyl substituent at the 2-position of the benzoxazole
ring system with the homologous n-propyl group, com-
pounds 15–20. When compared to the aforementioned
2-ethyl-benzoxazoles, the majority of the 2-propyl-
bearing analogues showed a simultaneous decrease in
MT1 affinity along with an increase in MT2 affinity,
albeit the latter was generally slight. As a consequence,
‘reversed’ selectivity was observed in this series, with
analogues showing greater affinity to the MT2 receptor
subtype. For example, compound 11, a 2-ethyl analogue,
showed moderate MT1 selectivity (MT2/MT1=6.6),
while the corresponding 2-propyl compound 17 pre-
sented much better MT2 selectivity (MT1/MT2=24). As
observed with the 2-ethyl series, the amide cyclopropyl
derivative 19 proved to be a highly potent analogue in
the 2-propyl series, but once again at the expense of
receptor selectivity.
based on the fact that the oxazole nitrogen is also a
hydrogen bond acceptor.23
In conclusion, benzoxazole derivatives26 have been
described as novel melatoninergic ligands that demon-
strate high binding affinity to both the MT1 and MT2
receptors. SARs have been defined around both the
terminal amide moiety and the C2 position of the ben-
zoxazole ring. These findings establish the substituted
benzoxazole ring system as a novel isostere for the
alkoxyaryl moiety of the endogenous ligand and its
close analogues.
References and notes
1. Yu, H.-S.; Reiter, R. J. Melatonin: Biosynthesis, Physio-
logical Effects and Clinic Applications; CRC Press: Boca
Raton, 1993.
2. Arendt, J. Melatonin and the Mammalian Pineal Gland;
Chapman and Hall: London, 1995.
3. Cassone, V. M. Trends in Neuroscience 1990, 13, 457.
4. Bartness, T. J.; Goldman, B. D. Experientia 1989, 45, 939.
5. Arendt, J.; Deacon, S.; English, J.; Hampton, S.; Morgan,
L. J. Sleep Res. 1995, 4, 74.
6. Wirz-Justice, A.; Amstrong, S. M. J. Sleep Res. 1996, 5, 137.
7. Reiter, R. J.; Tan, D. X.; Cabrera, J.; D’Arpa, D.; Sainz,
R. M.; Mayo, J. C.; Ramos, S. Biol. Signals Recept. 1999,
8, 56.
8. Lipartiti, M.; Franceschini, D.; Zanoni, R.; Gusella, M.;
Giusti, P.; Cagnoli, C. M.; Kharlamov, A.; Manev, H.
Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1996, 398, 315.
9. Ying, S.-W.; Niles, L. P.; Crocker, C. Eur. J. Pharmacol.-
Mol. Pharmacol. Section 1993, 246, 89.
10. Nelson, R. J.; Drazen, D. L. Reprod., Nutr., Dev. 1999,
39, 383.
11. Morgan, P. J.; Barrett, P.; Howell, H. E.; Helliwell, R.
Neurochem. Int. 1994, 24, 101.
12. Reppert, S. M.; Weaver, D. R.; Godson, C. Trends Phar-
macol. Sci. 1996, 17, 100.
2-iso-Propyl-benzoxazoles 21–26 were derived by sub-
stitution of the 2-ethyl group in the benzoxazole with an
iso-propyl group. This structural modification has a
greater effect on reducing MT1 affinity compared to
MT2 binding. Thus, substitution of the ethyl group in
compound 9 with an iso-propyl moiety (21) caused a 15-
fold decrease in MT1 affinity with negligible impact on
MT2 receptor binding. Changing the methyl group of
the amide side chain of 21 to an ethyl (22), propyl (23)
or iso-propyl (24) only slightly affected the potency at
both receptor subtypes. Pursuing a similar substitution
pattern with the cyclopropyl derivative 25 resulted in
the achievement of subnanomolar MT1 affinity that was
accompanied by a 2-fold decrease in MT2 binding.
However, as previously observed, the ethylamino sub-
stituent, as in 26, diminished binding to both receptors.
In addition, these compounds showed MT2/MT1 selec-
tivity ratios ranging between 1 to 4 and MT1/MT2
selectivity ratios varying between 2 to 15.
13. Takaki, K. S.; Mahle, C. D.; Watson, A. J. Curr. Pharm.
Des. 1997, 3, 429.
Of particular interest, a marked increase in binding
affinity was achieved by replacing the 2-ethyl group of
the benzoxazole 10 with a 4-phenyl-butyl group as in
compound 28. This modification imparted a 6-fold
increase in MT2 affinity while retaining MT1 affinity
comparable to the prototype 10. Compound 28 was the
most potent of this series with MT1 and MT2 affinities
8- and 4-fold more potent than melatonin, respectively.
Replacement of the propionamide of 28 by acetamide
(27), butyramide (29), or cyclopropylcarboxamide (31)
caused a slight decrease in MT2 activity but maintained
MT1 affinity. Pursuing a similar substitution with the
iso-propyl derivative 30 resulted in a larger decrease in
MT2 potency than in MT1 affinity, which, in turn,
enhanced the MT1 selectivity (MT2/MT1=14.6).
14. Teh, M.-T.; Sugden, D. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch.
Pharmacol. 1998, 358, 522.
15. Faust, R.; Garratt, P. J.; Jones, R.; Yeh, L. K.; Tsotinis,
A.; Panoussopoulou, M.; Calogeropoulou, T.; Teh, M. T.;
Sugden, D. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 1050.
16. Conway, S.; Canning, S. J.; Howell, H. E.; Mowat, E. S.;
Barrett, P.; Drew, J. E.; Delagrange, P.; Lesieur, D.;
Morgan, P. J. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2000, 390, 15.
17. Spadoni, G.; Balsamini, C.; Diamantini, G.; Tontini, A.;
Tarzia, G.; Mor, M.; Rivara, S.; Plazzi, P. V.; Nonno, R.;
Lucini, V.; Pannacci, M.; Fraschini, F.; Stankov, B. M. J.
Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 2900.
18. Wallez, V.; Durieux-Poissonnier, S.; Chavatte, P.; Boutin,
J. A.; Audinot, V.; Nicolas, J.-P.; Bennejean, C.; Delagrange,
P.; Renard, P.; Lesieur, D. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 2788.
19. Mattson, R. J.; Catt, J. D.; Keavy, D.; Sloan, C. P.;
Epperson, J.; Gao, Q.; Hodges, D. B.; Iben, L.; Mahle,
C. D.; Ryan, E.; Yocca, F. D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2003, 13, 1199.
20. Yous, S.; Durieux-Poissonnier, S.; Lipka-Belloli, E.;
Guelzim, H.; Bochu, C.; Audinot, V.; Boutin, J. A.;
Delagrange, P.; Bennejean, C.; Renard, P.; Lesieur, D.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2003, 11, 753.
21. Audinot, V.; Mailliet, F.; Lahaye-Brasseur, C.; Bonnaud,
A.; Le Gall, A.; Amosse, C.; Dromaint, S.; Rodriguez,
It has been reported that the methoxy group of melato-
nin and melatonergic ligands plays an important role in
modulating melatonin receptor affinity. It has generally
been assumed that the 5-OMe group of melatonin
functions as a hydrogen bond acceptor for the atom
- OH or NH of serine 115 of the MT1 receptor.25 The
results of the current study support this hypothesis