ambient temperature and in the absence of solvent provided,
after treatment with ethanolic Et3N‚HF,19 arene 8 in 70%
yield. Protection of the phenolic groups proceeded in
essentially quantitative yield with TBSOTf and lutidine. This
rapid arene construction can be scaled to proVide multigram
quantities without loss of efficiency. Selective monoreduction
of the aliphatic ester with a single equivalent of DIBAL-H
at -78 °C yielded aldehyde 9 in sufficient purity to obviate
the need for further purification. The stereocenters at C16
and C17 were established through a Brown crotylation
reaction20 which provided 10 as a single diastereomer in 90%
ee as determined through HPLC (Chiralcel OD-H column).
Protection of the C17 hydroxyl group followed by ozonolysis
resulted in the uneventful formation of aldehyde 11 in
excellent yield.
Scheme 4. Fragment Coupling
The preparation of the nucleophilic component of the aldol
coupling (Scheme 3) commenced with the addition of
reaction between 11 and 15 in the presence of BF3‚OEt2
proceeded with good preference (6:1) for the formation of
16. Evidence for the presence of the syn,syn-stereoisomer
was tentatively provided by analyzing the NMR chemical
shifts and coupling constants of the C14 hydrogens, in accord
with the model reported by the Roush group,26 and was
verified in subsequent intermediates. Chelation-controlled
reduction of the resulting â-hydroxy ketone with Et2BOMe
and NaBH427 provided diol 17 with excellent stereocontrol.
While 16 and its anti,syn-isomer were inseparable, the diols
that formed from the reduction were readily purified as single
stereoisomers. The syn-relationship in the major product was
confirmed through a 13C chemical shift analysis28 of ac-
etonide 18.
Scheme 3. Enolsilane Preparation
With the carbon framework intact we turned our attention
to the formation of the tetrahydropyran ring (Scheme 5).
Toward this goal the terminal alkene of 17 was subjected to
ozonolytic cleavage. The resulting lactol was acetylated at
C9 and C15 under standard conditions to yield 19. Selective
ionization of the anomeric acetoxy group and trapping the
intermediate oxocarbenium ion with TMSCN provided nitrile
20 as a single stereoisomer in excellent yield.29 Hydrating
the cyano group under classical conditions resulted in
extensive and nonselective protecting group cleavage. To
circumvent this problem, we employed the remarkably
selective Parkin catalyst (21)30 to produce amide 22 in nearly
quantitative yield, thereby completing the synthesis of the
N7-C25 fragment of psymberin.
Leighton’s allylsilane 1221 to keto aldehyde 13.22 This
reaction proceeded efficiently and in 94% ee as determined
by GC (Chiraldex G-TA column) to form 14. No ketone
addition was observed. Protection of the resulting alcohol
and enolsilane formation proceeded in quantitative yield to
provide 15.
The Lewis acid-mediated coupling of 15 with 11 (Scheme
4) proceeds with antagonistic stereodirection from the
substituents at C16 and C17. A Felkin-Anh approach23 (R-
direction) of the nucleophile is expected to provide the
syn,syn-stereotriad, while direction from the â-silyloxy group
is expected to yield the anti,syn-triad.24 Congruent with
Evans’ observations25 that R-direction overrides â-direction
when bulky nucleophiles are employed, the Mukaiyama aldol
While optimzing workup conditions for 20 we isolated
varying amounts of monodesilylated product 23. Since the
structure of 1 was determined solely by NMR, we felt that
(17) Node, M.; Fujiwara, T.; Ichihashi, S.; Nishide, K. Tetrahedron Lett.
1998, 39, 6331.
(18) Barker, D.; Brimble, M.; Do, P.; Turner, P. Tetrahedron 2003, 59,
2441.
(19) Other sources of fluoride led to the formation of significant quantities
of the C23 ethyl ether.
(20) Brown, H. C.; Bhat, K. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 5919.
(21) Kinnaird, J. W. A.; Ng, P. Y., Kubota, K.; Wang, X.; Leighton, J.
A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 7920.
(22) Prepared from the condensation of the enamine of isobutyraldehyde
with acetyl chloride. See: Inukai, T.; Yoshizawa, R. J. Org. Chem. 1967,
32, 404.
(23) (a) Cherest, M.; Felkin, H.; Prudent, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1968, 9,
2199. (b) Anh, N. T.; Eisenstein, O. NouV. J. Chem. 1977, 1, 61. (c) Lodge,
E. P.; Heathcock, C. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 3353.
(24) Evans, D. A.; Duffy, J. L.; Dart, M. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35,
8537.
(25) (a) Evans, D. A.; Allison, B. D.; Yang, M. G.; Masse, C. E. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 10840. (b) Evans, D. A.; Dart, M. J.; Duffy, J. L.;
Yang, M. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 4322.
(26) Roush, W. R.; Bannister, T. D.; Wendt, M. D.; VanNieuwenhze,
M. S.; Gustin, D. J.; Dilley, G. J.; Scheidt, K. A.; Smith, W. J. J. Org.
Chem. 2002, 67, 4284.
(27) Chen, K.-M.; Hardtmann, G. E.; Prasad, K.; Repic, O.; Shapiro,
M. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 155.
(28) (a) Rychnovsky, S. D.; Skalitzky, D. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31,
945. (b) Evans, D. A.; Rieger, D. L.; Gage, J. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990,
31, 7099.
(29) For a related strategy, see: Hoffmann, R. W.; Schlapbach, A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 7903.
(30) (a) Ghaffar, T.; Parkins, A. W. J. Mol. Catal. A 2000, 160, 249. (b)
Ghaffar, T.; Parkins, A. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 8657.
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 23, 2005
5177