C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
tions, from both P3 and P2, allowed the optimization of the other
two minima, denoted as A1 and A2 in Figure 2, that are the most
stable structures along the whole process. These minima possess a
hydrogen bond between the two pyridines. The proton transfer from
one pyridine group to the other connects A1 and A2 and takes place
through TSA, which is just 1.1 kcal/mol above A1. The existence
of A1 and A2 is one of the most important results of this DFT
study because it connects the two proton-transfer processes. In this
way, the protonation of one N(py) center could be the initial step
in the proton transfer. The low-energy cost allows the proton transfer
both to the Ru (TRANS) and to the Ru-H bond (CIS) that could
interconvert through A1-A2. The existence of 3 (TRANS) as a
sole species at -80 °C in acetone solution could be the consequence
of an unexplored additional stabilization at low temperature of this
tautomer. To the best of our knowledge, this mechanism, including
all the necessary TS’s, has never been theoretically seen.
Figure 1. H2/HD/D2 ratio versus time in the D+-H2 exchange with
2/methanol-d4 at room temperature.
The reaction scheme is completed with the minimum energy
structure P1, obtained by H2 release from CIS and formation of a
Ru-py bond. In terms of free energy, P1 will be probably very
favored due to the increase of entropy that supposes the loss of
H2. This fact would support the experimental evolution of 3 to give
1′. The full sequence represented in Figure 2 also supports our
labeling experiments. Accepting that the release of dihydrogen is
a reversible process and that the involvement of acid species of
pyridinium as A1, A2, P2, and P3 allows the incorporation of
deuterons from methanol-d4, the labeling of external H2 must be a
feasible process.
In conclusion, the substitution of PPh3 by PPh2py dramatically
changes the behavior of [Cp*RuHP2] against proton-transfer
processes. In contrast with the PPh3 derivative, 2 gives a trans
dihydride even at low temperature. Probably the kinetic control is
suppressed at this temperature due to the easy intramolecular proton
transfer favored by the presence of the N(py) basic centers. At room
temperature, the cis-(H2) tautomer must be easily formed (H2
release) and a heterolytic activation of H2 takes place. A complete
theoretical study, including all of the transition states for the proton-
transfer processes, supports all of the experimental observations.
Figure 2. Calculated reaction profile (kcal/mol) for the proton transfer
over [CpRuH2(PMe2py)2]+. Energy values are given in brackets in kcal/
mol (vacuum/acetone).
for the model compound [CpRuH(PMe2py)2] was optimized. The
starting parameters for this structure were based on the X-ray
structure of [CpRuH(PPh3)2].8 Theoretical results are depicted in
Figure 2 (see also Supporting Information), where the geometries
of the located stationary points are shown along with a scheme of
their relative energy (values in kcal/mol in brackets).
Acknowledgment. Financial support from the Spanish DGES/
MCyT (CTQ2005-01430/BQU) and from the J. Castilla-La Man-
cha-FEDER Funds (PBI-05-003) and facilities in the use of the
Computational Service of the UCLM are acknowledged. Dedicated
to Prof. Elguero on the occasion of his 70th birthday.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental section, and
computational details (22 pages, print/PDF). This material is available
The energy was calculated in vacuum and also by introducing
acetone as solvent correction through the PCM cavity method.9 The
energy levels in the figure and the data in the discussion refer to
the vacuum calculations, but the conclusions in acetone are similar.
These results reveal the existence of both the dihydrogen (CIS)
and the dihydride (TRANS) structures, which are very close in
energy (CIS 1.3 kcal/mol more stable than TRANS). As seen in
the left part of Figure 2, a proton transfer transforms the TRANS
structure into another minimum labeled P3 that exhibits an intra-
molecular hydrogen bond, Ru‚‚‚H-N(py). Fortunately, we were
able to find the transition state (TST) between these two minima.
The energetic accessibility of TST ensures that deprotonation of
the TRANS form to give P3 is theoretically possible. Another
proton-transfer process is presented on the right of Figure 2 that
goes from the CIS minimum to a dihydrogen-bridged structure
termed P2. The participation of unconventional hydrogen bonds,
as those found in P2 and P3, in proton-transfer processes has been
previously proposed.10 Again, a low-energy transition state TSC
was found linking CIS and P2 minima. This fact implies that not
only the proton transfer from a fragment pyH to a Ru-H bond is
feasible but also the reverse process of heterolytic breaking of the
coordinated H2 molecule in CIS, thanks to the participation of the
pyridine moiety. A combination of Ru-P and P-C(py) bond rota-
References
(1) Papish, E. T.; Magee, M. P.; Norton, J. R. In Recent AdVances in Hydride
Chemistry; Peruzzini, M., Poli, R., Eds.; Elsevier: New York, 2002;
Chapter 4, p 39.
(2) Chinn, M. S.; Heinekey, D. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 5166.
(3) (a) Ayllo´n, J. A.; Sayers, S. F.; Sabo-Etienne, S.; Donnadieu, B.; Chaudret,
B.; Clot, E. Organometallics 1999, 18, 3981. (b) Gruet, K.; Eisenstein,
O.; Lee, D. H.; Patel, B. Macchioni, A.; Crabtree, R. H. New J. Chem.
2003, 27, 80.
(4) Caballero, A.; Jalo´n, F. A.; Manzano, B. R. Chem. Commun. 1998, 1879.
(5) Bakhmutov, V. I. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 245.
(6) (a) Bautista, M. T.; Earl, K. A.; Maltby, P. A.; Morris, R. H.; Scheweitzer,
C. T.; Sella A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 7031. (b) Desrosiers, P. J.;
Cai, L.; Lin, Z.; Richards, R.; Halpern, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113,
4173.
(7) Crabtree, R. H.; Siegbahn, P. E. M.; Eisenstein, O.; Rheingold, A.; Koetzle,
T. F. Acc. Chem. Res. 1996, 29, 348.
(8) Smith, K.-T.; Rømming, C.; Tilset, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 8681.
(9) Tomasi, J.; Persico, M. Chem. ReV. 1994, 94, 2027.
(10) (a) Epstein, L. M.; Shubina, E. S. Coord. Chem. ReV. 2002, 231, 165. (b)
Belkova, N. V.; Gutsul, E. I.; Shubina, E. S.; Epstein, L. M. Z. Phys.
Chem. 2003, 217, 1525.
JA055116F
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 44, 2005 15365