8792 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 62, No. 25, 1997
Omura
were employed as the reactants (run 6, Table 2). Syn-
thesis of 5c by coupling of 4-ethyl-2,6-di-tert-butylphe-
noxy radicals with O2 (cf. eq 1) has not been feasible due
to rapid disproportionation of the radical.5a
As exemplified above, symmetrically substituted bis(oxo-
cyclohexadienyl) peroxides 5 (R ) R′) including ones
unobtainable by the classical procedure (eq 1) can be
synthesized by our new method.
The concept of the new method predicts that prepara-
tion of unsymmetrically substituted bis(oxocyclohexadi-
enyl) peroxides 5 (R * R′) may likewise be possible. It
should be emphasized that, as Altwicker has previously
pointed out, formation of a “mixed peroxide” such as 5
(R * R′) from a competition of two different phenoxy
radicals for O2 is difficult,1a possibly owing to different
stability and/or different reactivity toward O2, of the
different radicals. As far as we are aware, a very rare
example of an isolated “mixed peroxide” is 8.8 Peroxide
8 is formed during thermal decomposition of a transan-
nular ozonide of an anthracene derivative in the presence
of 2,4,6-tri-tert-butylphenol. This decomposition is sug-
gested to generate phenoxy radical 7, 2,4,6-tri-tert-
butylphenoxy radical and O2. Peroxide 5b is formed
simultaneously, as may be anticipated (eq 4). It was
It is our feeling that a bulky 4-alkyl substituent in
halogeno dienone 3 or hydrperoxy dienone 4 tends to
decrease the yield of bis(cyclohexadienyl) peroxide 5 in
the NIS reaction in MeCN, but the data accumulated
above may not be enough to make a conclusive statement.
In general, bis(oxocyclohexadienyl) peroxides 5 obtained
in this study were isolated simply by passing the crude
reaction product through neutral alumina (Activity II)
with petroleum ether. Products other than 5 were not
investigated in detail.
By our new method, synthesis of a variety of fresh
bis(oxocyclohexadienyl) peroxides may be expected when
it is taken into account that diverse methods are avail-
able for preparing 4-(or 6-)halogeno-9 and 4-(or 6-)hydro-
peroxycyclohexa-2,5-(or 2,4-)dienones10 as the starting
materials.
Exp er im en ta l Section
1H (90 MHz) and 13C (22.6 MHz) NMR and IR spectra were
taken in CDCl3 and in CHCl3, respectively. TLC was run on
SiO2.
Sta r tin g Ma ter ia ls. Halogeno dienones 3a ,9d 3b,5b 3c,5b
and 3d 9d were synthesized according to the reported methods.
Compound 3e was prepared in a nearly quantitative yield by
adaptation of the reported method for the preparation of 3a
and 3d ,9d using 4-ethyl-2,6-di-tert-butylphenol (0.1 mol), sul-
furyl chloride (0.12 mol), and trimethyl phosphate (190 mL in
total) at ca. 3 °C. Light yellow crystals from hexane: mp 46-
1
47 °C; H NMR δ 6.54 (s, 2H), 2.08 (q, J ) 7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.25
(s, 18H), 0.86 (t, J ) 7.4 Hz, 3H); IR 1659, 1640 cm-1. Anal.
Calcd for C16H25OCl: C, 71.49; H, 9.37; Cl, 13.19. Found: C,
71.21; H, 9.64; Cl, 13.33.
Hydroperoxy dienones 4a and 4b were synthesized accord-
ing to the reported procedure.10g Employment of a mixture of
EtOH and H2O (20:1) in place of EtOH alone as the solvent
made completion of the reaction appreciably faster. Compound
4c was obtained in 70% yield by adaptation of the method
reported for the preparation of 4a and 4b10g by using 4-ethyl-
2,6-di-tert-butylphenol (50 mmol), KOH (0.6 mol), a mixture
of EtOH (400 mL) and H2O (20 mL), and O2. Colorless crystals
from petroleum ether: mp 89-91 °C; 1H NMR δ 7.79 (s, 1H),
6.51 (s, 2H), 1.70 (q, J ) 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.25 (s, 18H), 0.76 (t, J
) 7.5 Hz, 3H); IR 3520, 3300 (br), 1665, 1642 cm-1
. Anal.
proved that our procedure can indeed make “mixed
peroxides”, 5 (R * R′). For instance, with the assistance
of NIS in MeCN, 3a successfully coupled with 4b, forming
a new “mixed peroxide”, 1-methyl-3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-
oxocyclohexa-2,5-dienyl 1,3,5-tri-tert-butyl-4-oxocyclohexa-
2,5-dienyl peroxide (5d ) in 61% yield (run 7, Table 2).
As expected, the same peroxide (5d ) was obtainable also
from combination of 3b with 4b (run 8, Table 2) or of 3c
with 4a (run 9, Table 2). From runs 7-9, Table 2, neither
symmetrically substituted bis(oxocyclohexadienyl) per-
oxide 5a nor 5b was detectable, which is compatible with
our originally proposed mechanism (Scheme 1). Allowing
3d to react with 4a for a long period, however, did not
produce 5d at all, again supporting the assumed lack of
interaction between 3d and NIS (run 10, Table 2).
Another new “mixed peroxide”, (1-ethyl-3,5-di-tert-butyl-
4-oxocyclohexa-2,5-dienyl) 1,3,5-tri-tert-butyl-4-oxocyclo-
hexa-2,5-dienyl peroxide (5e) was furnished from the
reaction of 3e with 4b (run 11, Table 2). Finally, the NIS-
induced reaction of 3a with 4c or of 3e with 4a gave a
crystalline product, presumed to be “mixed peroxide” 5f,
in a good yield (70% or less). Unfortunately, stubborn
contamination by an impurity (impurities) has prevented
purification of the product.
Calcd for C16H26O3: C, 72.14; H, 9.84. Found: C, 72.09; H,
10.08.11
Other reagents were used as received.
P er oxid e 5a fr om Ch lor o Dien on e 3a a n d Hyd r op er -
oxy Dien on e 4a As Assisted by P ositive Ha logen Re-
a gen ts (Ta ble 1). To 3a (255 mg, 1 mmol) and a positive
halogen compound (1 mmol) placed in a bottle was added in
one portion a solution of 4a (756 mg, 3 mmol) in a solvent (15
mL). In run 1, Table 1, a positive halogen reagent was
omitted. In run 3, Table 1, 0.33 mmol (75 mg) of NIS was
employed as the positive halogen compound. The mixture in
the stoppered bottle was stirred at 35 °C for the time indicated
(9) (a) Ershov, V. V.; Volod’kin, A. A. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Otd.
Khim. Nauk 1962, 2150. (b) Ershov, V. V.; Volod’kin, A. A. Izv. Akad.
Nauk SSSR, Otd. Khim. Nauk 1963, 893. (c) Calo`, V; Lopez, L.; Pesce,
G.; Ciminale, F.; Todesco, P. E. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1974,
1192. (d) Pearson, D. E.; Venkataramu, S. D.; Childers, W. E., J r.
Synth. Commun. 1979, 9, 5. (e) Fischer, A.; Henderson, G. N. Can. J .
Chem. 1979, 57, 552. (f) Fischer, A.; Henderson, G. N. Can. J . Chem.
1983, 61, 1045.
(10) (a) Coppinger, G. M. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1957, 79, 2758. (b)
Bickel, A. F.; Gersmann, H. R. Proc. Chem. Soc. 1957, 231. (c)
Gersmann, H. R.; Bickel, A. F. J . Chem. Soc. 1962, 2356. (d) Bacon,
R. G. R.; Kuan, L. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1971, 3397. (e) Barton, D. H.
R.; Magnus, P. D.; Quinney, J . C. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1975,
1610. (f) Nishinaga, A.; Itahara, T.; Shimizu, T.; Matsuura, T. J . Am.
Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 1820. (g) Nishinaga, A.; Shimizu, T.; Matsuura,
T. J . Org. Chem. 1979, 44, 2983. (h) Futamura, S.; Yamazaki, K.; Ohta,
H.; Kamiya, Y. Bull. Chem. Soc. J pn. 1982, 55, 3852. (i) J efford, C.
W.; Bernardinelli, G.; McGoran, E. C. Helv. Chim. Acta 1984, 67, 1952.
(j) Yumbie, N. P.; Thompson, J . A. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 1988, 1, 385.
(8) Rigaudy, J .; Chelu, G.; Cuong, N. K. J . Org. Chem. 1985, 50,
4474.