Scheme 1
Scheme 2
desymmetrization of the diacetate of the meso-2-methyl-1,3-
propanediol 15 (Scheme 3).5 Hydroxyl protection in 16 as
MOM ether and acetate hydrolysis yielded 17.4 Swern
oxidation in 17 and Horner-Wittig olefination furnished the
R,â-unsaturated ester 18.4 DIBAL-H reduction in 18 led to
the allylic alcohol 19 (Scheme 3). Sharpless epoxidation6 of
allylic alcohol 19 in the presence of the D-tartaric acid diethyl
ester was stereoselective (9:1) and afforded the epoxide 20
in a predictable manner with ample precedence.7
Regioselective epoxide opening in 20 with Et2CuLi led8
to the diol 21, and the primary hydroxyl group was
chemoselectively oxidized to the hydroxyl aldehyde 22
(Scheme 4). Horner-Wittig olefination in 22 with ethyl
2-(triphenylphosphoranylidene)butyrate introduced the ele-
ments of the second butyrate moiety in a stereoselective
manner to furnish 23.4 The free hydroxyl group in 23 was
now protected as the benzyl ether derivative 24. DIBAL-H
reduction in 24 gave the allylic alcohol 25, and the primary
hydroxyl group was now protected as the TBDPS derivative
26, in which the three hydroxyl groups were chemo-
differentiable through protective group manoeuvres (Scheme
4). Removal of the MOM protection in 26 led to 27, and
further PDC oxidation furnished the key aldehyde 28.
Our original plan was to elaborate the aldehyde 28 to gem-
dibromoalkene 29 and further to the alkyne 30 en route to
the pivotal fragment 8 (Scheme 5). However, several tactical
operations on 28 using PPh3-CBr4 reagent9 failed to deliver
the desired 29 and only led to the elimination of the OBn
recourse to the putative biogenetic pathway involving an
intramolecular Diels-Alder reaction as the pivotal step in
precursor 6 appeared to be most appealing. From a retrosyn-
thetic point of view, it was further reasoned that 6 could be
assembled from two building blocks 7 and 8 involving a
Suzuki or equivalent cross-coupling reaction (Scheme 1). In
this letter, we detail the travails toward speculoic acid A 1
that have so far led to the bicyclic hydrindane 9 (vide infra),
incorporating much of the framework and several key
stereochemical features present in the natural product.
Preparation of fragment 7 was fairly straightforward
and accomplished from diethyl malonate 10 (Scheme 2).
Sequential alkylation in 10 with ethyl bromide and di-
iodocarbene furnished 11.3,4 Base-mediated decarboxylative
elimination gave (E)-3-iodo-2-methyl-2-propenoic acid 12,
and further LAH reduction and oxidation of the resulting
allylic alcohol led to aldehyde 13. Wittig styrenylation on
13 delivered the desired 7 (3:2) along with the (Z)-isomer
14 from which it was easily separable (Scheme 2).4
(5) For a related example, see: Grisenti, P.; Ferraboschi, P.; Manzocchi,
A.; Santaniello, E. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 3827.
For an enantioselective approach toward the synthesis of
the more challenging fragment 8, we selected (R)-mono-
acetate 16 (98% ee), readily prepared from the enzymatic
(6) Katsuki, T.; Sharpless, K. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 5974.
(7) (a) Wakabayashi, T.; Mori, K.; Kobayashi, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2001, 123, 1372. (b) Nagaoka, H.; Kishi, Y. Tetrahedron 1981, 37, 3873.
(8) For examples of cuprate-mediated epoxide opening, see: (a) Nicolaou,
K. C.; Murphy, F.; Barluenga, S.; Ohshima, T.; Wei, H.; Xu, J.; Gray, D.
L. F.; Baudoin, O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 3830. (b) Horita, K.;
Tanaka, K.; Yonemitsu, O. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1993, 41, 2044.
(3) Baker, R.; Castro, J. L. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1990, 47.
(4) All new compounds reported here were characterized on the basis
1
of their spectral data (IR, H and 13C NMR, and HRMS).
5570
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 25, 2005