Yun et al.
In launching our program toward the total synthesis
and biological evaluation of panaxytriol, we were mindful
of the unique attributes of this cytotoxic natural product.
It is, in fact, very rare to find a documented instance of
a tumor retardant isolated from a food product. Thus,
given the widespread availability of the source, red
ginseng, as well as the lack of toxicity that would be
expected from a food component, even a very moderate
cytotoxic effect would be considered to be particularly
noteworthy in the context of panaxytriol.
To date, a number of syntheses have been reported for
panaxytriol.10 We recently disclosed our own total syn-
thesis, which we hoped would allow access to significant
amounts of the natural product for extensive biological
investigations.10i We report, herein, the development of
a slightly modified route, which has allowed us to prepare
multigram quantities of synthetic panaxytriol. The syn-
thetic material was evaluated for its cytotoxic properties
in a number of in vitro and in vivo contexts. Using our
streamlined panaxytriol synthesis as a guide, we pre-
pared several synthetic analogues, whose activities were
compared to the natural product. With these results, we
have begun to chart an SAR map for panaxytriol.
Finally, we recently became aware of a disclosure from
the laboratory of Kurimoto et. al. on the in vitro neu-
rotrophic activity of the organic extracts of red ginseng.11
The authors did not attempt to identify the neurotrophi-
cally active components of the red ginseng extract;
however, with ample synthetic panaxytriol on hand, we
sought to determine whether this compound was a
contributor to the observed activity. This line of inves-
tigation is in keeping with a broad program in our
laboratory that is devoted to the total synthesis and
biological evaluation of nonpeptidyl small molecule neu-
rotrophic factors. We report the results of this prelimi-
nary investigation herein.
Modified Synthesis of Panaxytriol. As previously
reported,10i the defining transformation of our synthesis
of panaxytriol (1) is the Cadiot-Chodkiewicz coupling12
of alkynyl bromide 4 and alkyne 5, which constitutes the
final step of the synthesis. Despite the overall conver-
gence and efficiency of the original route, we found that
the preparation of intermediate 5 was not particularly
amenable to reaction scale-up. Our first task would be
to modify our synthesis of 5 to allow for the facile
preparation of multigram quantities of panaxytriol.
the corresponding TBS ether of 6 to afford 7 in ap-
proximately 99% ee. Protection of the resultant diol as
an acetonide, followed by cleavage of the TBS ether, and
subsequent bromination provided intermediate 8. The
latter was subjected to acid-induced deprotection followed
by epoxide formation to afford 9, which was then alky-
lated with Li/acetylide to give rise to coupling partner 5.
Unfortunately, the conversion of 7 to 8 was found to be
quite sluggish when the reaction was performed on a
large scale (∼20 mmol). We have developed an improved
route to 5 that converges on intermediate 9 from the
original synthesis. Thus, Sharpless asymmetric dihy-
droxylation of 6, followed by TBDPS protection of the
primary alcohol, furnished intermediate 10. Following
acetonide protection of the diol, the TBDPS group was
removed and the resultant primary alcohol was converted
to an iodide to afford 11. The latter was then deprotected
and epoxidized to provide intermediate 9 in good overall
yield from 6. The epoxide was converted to the terminal
alkyne (5), which was coupled with alkynyl bromide 4
according to the previously disclosed method, to provide
panaxytriol (1) in 51% overall yield from 6. This modified
route has been used to prepare up to 10 g of synthetic
panaxytriol.
Preparation of Synthetic Analogues of Panaxy-
triol. We next prepared several synthetic derivatives of
panaxytriol, in the hopes of constructing an SAR profile
with respect to antitumor activity. Thus, analogues were
prepared in which the C9-C10 glycol was protected as an
acetonide (12), the C3 alcohol was oxidized to a ketone
(13), and the C3 of the acetonide derivative was oxidized
to a ketone (14).
Biological Investigations: Antitumor Activity.
The in vitro cytotoxicities of panaxytriol (1) and its
derivatives (12, 13, and 14) were evaluated against
multidrug resistance (MDR)-sensitive (CCRF-CEM) and
MDR-resistant (CCRF-CEM/VBL) cell lines (Table 1). We
were interested to find that each of the panaxytriol
derivatives (12, 13, and 14) exhibited a stronger inhibi-
tory effect than did panaxytriol itself. On the basis of
these results, it would appear that the C3 alcohol function
is not required for biological activity (cf. 1 versus 13).
The acetonide derivative, 12, the most active analogue,
is roughly 6-fold more potent than panaxytriol. Impor-
tantly, each of the four compounds examined retained
its potency against the CCRF-CEM/VBL cell line, which
displays a multidrug resistance phenotype. These results
provide strong evidence that panaxytriol and its deriva-
tives are not substrates for the P-glycoprotein and thus
would not be vulnerable to multidrug resistance.
The previously described synthesis of alkyne 5 com-
menced with Sharpless asymmetric dihydroxylation13 of
(10) (a) Satoh, M.; Takeuchi, N.; Fujimoto, Y. Chem. Pharm. Bull.
1997, 45, 1114. (b) Lu, W.; Zheng, G.; Cai, J. Synlett 1998, 737. (c) Lu,
W.; Zheng, G.; Gao, D.; Cai, J. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 7157. (d) Gurjar,
M. K.; Kumar, V. S.; Rao, B. V. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 12563. (e) Kim,
S.-I.; Lee, Y.-H.; Ahn, B.-Z. Arch. Pharm. 1999, 332, 133. (f) Lu, W.;
Zheng, G. R.; Shen, J. S.; Cai, J. C. Chin. Chem. Lett. 1999, 10, 201.
(g) Yadav, J. S.; Maiti, A. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 4955. (h) Mayer, S.
F.; Steinreiber, A.; Orru, R. V. A.; Faber K. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67,
9115. (i) Yun, H.; Danishefsky, S. J. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 4519.
(11) Mizumaki, Y.; Kurimoto, M.; Hirashima, Y.; Nishijima, M.;
Kamiyama, H.; Nagai, S.; Takaku, A.; Sugihara, K.; Shimizu, M.; Endo,
S. Brain Res. 2002, 950, 254.
(12) (a) Chodkiewicz, W. Ann. Chim. (Paris) 1957, 2, 819. (b)
Brandsma, L. Preparative Acetylenic Chemistry, 2nd ed.; Elsevier:
Amsterdam, 1988; pp 212-214. (c) For recent work in this area, see:
Siemsen, P.; Livingston, R. C.; Diederich, F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2000, 39, 2632.
(13) Kolb, H. C.; VanNieuwenhze, M. S.; Sharpless, K. B. Chem.
Rev. 1994, 94, 2483.
It is of note that the presence of the acetonide func-
tionality appears to confer an increase in cytotoxicity, as
evidenced by the fact that both acetonide derivatives (12
10376 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 70, No. 25, 2005