compounds. The parallel work was very recently reported
by Chatani and included azodicarboxylates as electrofile.12
However, as we were interested in more complicated
hydrazine derivatives, our studies are not confined to
symmetrical azo compounds.
The starting materials were easily obtained from the
corresponding disubstituted hydrazines via oxidation with
Br2/Py13 or activated MnO2 in dichloromethane at room
temperature. The reaction is outlined in Scheme 1, and the
results are presented in Table 1.
substantially increase the yield to quantitative and to decrease
the reaction time (2 h in methanol at rt, 1.5 h under reflux).
The same arylation in CH2Cl2 was complete in 16 h at rt,
giving the product in 93% yield. After refluxing the reaction
mixture in acetonitrile for 6 days the starting material was
recovered in 31% and 45% of product was obtained.
Therefore, methanol was considered to be the solvent of
choice for this reaction.
The regioselectivity of addition to ArNdNBoc is con-
1
firmed by the analysis of H NMR spectra. The signal at
7.0 ppm corresponds to BocNH, and no hypothetical PhNH
was detected in the range 5-6 ppm. The melting point of
the product Ph2NNHBoc (122-123.5 °C, from hexane) was
in agreement with data reported previously (122.5-124 °C,
from cyclohexane).15 Coupling of PhB(OH)2 and DNPNd
NBoc was the only reaction, where we have isolated the other
isomer in 21% yield. The products were distinguished by
the signal at 9.46 ppm in 1H NMR, which belongs to DNPNH
in DNPNHNHBoc and DNPNHNPhBoc.
Scheme 1. Reaction between Arylboronic Acids and Different
Azo Compounds
BocNdNBoc was found to be more reactive than PhNd
NBoc since all arylations except in the case of with 3-PyB-
(OH)2 did not require elevated temperatures and were
complete in less than 45 min. On the other hand, coupling
of PhNdNPh with phenylboronic acid was extremely slow
under the described conditions.
The addition is not very sensitive to steric hindrance as
judged from the short reaction times of 1-naphthylboronic
acid. Still, low yields and longer reactions times in the case
of 3-PyB(OH)2 suggest some dependence on the electronic
effect of the aryl group. The results obtained with 3-thien-
ylboronic acid are also quite different from those with the
isomeric 2-thienylboronic acid.
PhNdNBoc was used as model compound.14 The addition
of phenylboronic acid (1.1 equiv) proceeded even without
catalyst in refluxing methanol (24 h), yielding 71% of Ph2-
NNHBoc with traces of PhNHNHBoc as detected on TLC.
Catalytic 5 mol % of Cu(OAc)2‚H2O was essential to
Coupling of PhNdNBoc with 1-naphthylboronic acid was
the only case where we observed positive influence of inert
atmosphere (77% under argon versus 55% in the presence
of air). BocNdNBoc yielded exactly the same results with
2- and 3-thienylboronic acids under both air and argon
atmosphere. In several reactions between thienylboronic acids
and azo compounds, the corresponding hydrazines were
detected in traces by TLC as the result of a reductive side
reaction.
Table 1. Copper-catalyzed Addition of Arylboronic Acids to
Azo Compounds
entry
1a PhNdNBoc
1b PhNdNBoc
1c PhNdNBoc
1d PhNdNBoc
1e PhNdNBoc
azo compd
aryl
reaction time yield, %
Ph
1.5 ha
45 min
6 h
100
77
65
b
1-naphthyl
3-Py
2-thienyl
3-thienyl
Ph
1- naphthyl
3-Py
2-thienyl
3-thienyl
Ph
The possible reaction mechanism, as derived from gener-
ally accepted considerations, is depicted in Scheme 2.
7 h
7 h
b
2a BocNdNBoc
2b BocNdNBoc
30 min
30 min
15 min
20 min
40 min
7-8 min
22 h
1 h
4 h
8 h
16 h
91
60
43
45
100
It is interesting that the addition of alkyl/aryl organo-
metallic nucleophiles to a row of unsymmetrical azo
2c
BocNdNBoc
2d BocNdNBoc
(12) Uemura, T.; Chatani, N. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 8361.
(13) Starr, J. T.; Rai, G. S.; Dang, H.; McNelis, B. J. Synth. Commun.
1997, 27, 3197.
2e
BocNdNBoc
3a DNPNdNBocc
3b DNPNdNBoc
57d
3-Py
18
100
94
78
b
(14) A typical procedure is given, using 1a as example. The mixture of
PhNdNBoc (100 mg, 0.4854 mmol), PhB(OH)2 (95 mg, 1.6 equiv), and
Cu(OAc)2‚H2O (6 mg, 0.05 equiv) was refluxed in methanol (2 mL). The
reaction was monitored by TLC (1: 4 EtOAc-hexane). After starting
material was consumed in 1.5 h, silica gel (0.5 g) was added to the mixture
and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The obtained residue
was chromatographed (1:10 EtOAc-hexane), yielding 138 mg (quantitative
yield) of white solid Ph2NNHBoc, pure by TLC and NMR: IR (KBr) ν )
4a 4-NO2C6H4NdNBoc Ph
4b 4-NO2C6H4NdNBoc 1- naphthyl
4c
4d 4-NO2C6H4NdNBoc 2-thienyl
4e 4-NO2C6H4NdNBoc 3-thienyl
4-NO2C6H4NdNBoc 3-Py
36 h
59
a Experiments 1a-e, 2c, and 3a-4e were conducted at reflux, the rest
at rt. b Only decomposition products. c DNP: 2,4-dinitrophenyl. d 21% of
DNPNHNPhBoc and 21% of DNPNHNHBoc were isolated.
1
3317 (NH), 1704 (CO) cm-1; H NMR δ ) 1.48/1.31 (s, 9H, Boc), 6.87/
6.71 (broad s, 1H, NH), 6.9-7.4 (m, 10H, Ph); 13C NMR δ ) 28.3 (Boc),
81.3 (Cq, Boc), 119.4, 122.7, 129.1, 146.4 (Ph), 155.3 (CO, Boc).
(15) Koga, N.; Anselme, J.-P. J. Org. Chem. 1968, 33, 3963.
44
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 1, 2006