A. Mourran, U. Ziener, M. Möller, E. Breuning, M. Ohkita, J.-M. Lehn
these determinations is estimated below 5% for distances and
FULL PAPER
without further purification. 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 0.39
[s, 9 H, Sn(CH3)3], 0.89 (t, J = 6.1 Hz, 3 H, CH3), 1.26 (m, 26 H, angles.
CH2), 1.63 (quint, J = 6.7 Hz, 2 H, OCH2CH2), 3.50 (t, J = 6.4 Hz,
2 H, OCH2), 4.57 (s, 2 H, CpyCH2O), 7.44 (dd, J = 7.3 and 1.5 Hz,
Acknowledgments
1 H, 3Ј- or 5Ј-H), 7.64 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1 H, 4Ј-H), 7.80 (dd, J = 8.2
and 2.4 Hz, 1 H, 3-H), 8.27 (dd, J = 7.9 and 1.2 Hz, 1 H, 3Ј- or
5Ј-H), 8.54 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1 H, 4-H), 8.62 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1 H, 6-
H). A mixture of 7 (334 mg, 0.58 mmol), 4,6-dichloro-2-phenylpyr-
imidine (8)[15] (66 mg, 0.29 mmol), and Pd(PPh3)4 (34 mg,
0.029 mmol) in toluene (5 mL) under argon was refluxed for 21 h.
After evaporation of the solvent, the residue was taken up in CHCl3
and filtered through a short pad of alumina. The solvent was evap-
orated, the residue was taken up in MeOH/acetone (1:1, v/v), and
the precipitate formed was centrifuged off, washed with MeOH/
acetone and dried in vacuo. The crude product thus obtained was
further purified by column chromatography on alumina eluting
with hexane/CHCl3 (1:1, v/v) to afford 1 as a colorless powder
(162 mg, 57%). M.p. 141 °C. 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): δ =
0.87 (t, J = 5.8 Hz, 6 H, CH3), 1.24 (m, 52 H, CH2), 1.67 (quint,
J = 7.0 Hz, 4 H, OCH2CH2), 3.56 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 4 H, OCH2), 4.64
(s, 4 H, CpyCH2O), 7.56–7.65 (m, 3 H, m- and p-H), 7.87 (d, J =
6.7 Hz, 2 H, 3Ј- or 5Ј-H), 8.05 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 2 H, 4Ј-H), 8.60 (d,
J = 7.9 Hz, 2 H, 3Ј- or 5Ј-H), 8.71–8.80 (m, 8 H, o-, 3ЈЈ-, 4ЈЈ- and
6ЈЈ-H), 9.62 (s, 1 H, 5-H). 13C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 14.1,
22.7, 26.2, 29.3, 29.5, 29.6, 29.6, 29.6, 29.7, 29.8, 31.9, 70.3, 70.9,
111.5, 120.8, 121.7, 122.4, 128.4, 128.4, 130.6, 134.4, 136.0, 137.9,
137.9, 148.5, 153.8, 155.3, 155.4, 163.9, 164.1. MS (FAB): m/z (%)
We thank the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture
of Japan (M. O.), Université Louis Pasteur (M. O.), and the Min-
istère de l’Education Nationale, de la Recherche et de la Technolo-
gie (E. B.). The work was further supported by the Deutsche For-
schungsgemeinschaft within the framework of the Sonderfor-
schungsbereich 569 at the University of Ulm and is part of the
Marie Curie Research Training Network program BioPolySurf,
which is financially supported by the EU under contract no.
MRTN-CT-2004-005516. We also thank P. Maltèse (NMR) and H.
Nierengarten (ES MS) for their spectroscopic measurements.
[1] J.-M. Lehn, Supramolecular Chemistry: Concepts and Perspec-
tives, VCH, Weinheim, 1995.
[2] G. S. Hanan, D. Volkmer, U. S. Schubert, J.-M. Lehn, G.
Baum, D. Fenske, Angew. Chem. 1997, 109, 1929–1931; Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 1842–1844.
[3] a) D. M. Bassani, J.-M. Lehn, K. Fromm, D. Fenske, Angew.
Chem. 1998, 110, 2534–2537; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37,
2364–2367; b) J. Rojo, F.-J. Romero-Salguero, J.-M. Lehn, G.
Baum, D. Fenske, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 1999, 1421–1428.
[4] For a recent review, see: M. Ruben, J. Rojo, F. J. Romero-Sal-
guero, L. H. Uppadine, J.-M. Lehn, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2004, 43, 3644–3662.
[5] M. Ruben, E. Breuning, J.-P. Gisselbrecht, J.-M. Lehn, Angew.
Chem. 2000, 112, 4312–4315; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39,
4139–4142.
[6] O. Waldmann, J. Hassmann, P. Müller, G. S. Hanan, D. Volk-
mer, U. S. Schubert, J.-M. Lehn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997, 78,
3390–3393.
[7] E. Breuning, M. Ruben, J.-M. Lehn, F. Renz, Y. Garcia, V.
Ksenofontov, P. Gutlich, E. Wegelius, K. Rissanen, Angew.
Chem. 2000, 112, 2563–2566; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39,
2504–2507.
[8] I. Weissbuch, P. N. W. Baxter, S. Cohen, H. Cohen, K. Kjaer,
P. B. Howes, J. Als-Nielsen, G. S. Hanan, U. S. Schubert, J.-M.
Lehn, L. Leiserowitz, M. Lahav, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120,
4850–4860.
= 973.7 (100) [M + H]+. IR (KBr): ν = 3060, 2918, 2850, 1720,
˜
1556, 1540, 1471, 1377, 1263, 1115, 1022, 994, 814, 50, 718, 690,
652, 634 cm–1. HR-MS (FAB): C64H89N6O2 (1022.51): calcd. m/z
= 973.704702, found m/z = 973.705754 [M + H]+.
[2×2]-Grid-Type FeII Complex (2): A mixture of 1 (5 mg, 5.14
μmol) and Fe(BF4)2·6H2O (1.73 mg, 5.14 μmol) in CHCl3 (0.4 mL)
and CH3CN (0.4 mL) under argon was refluxed. The reaction was
monitored by 1H NMR spectroscopy and ES mass spectrometry
and was proven to be completed after 15 h. Evaporation of the
solvents afforded pure complex 2 in a quantitative yield as a dark
green powder. 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3/CD3CN): δ = –17.8,
–10.2, 0.0, 2.3, 2.8, 5.6, 7.3, 13.4, 14.2, 17.5, 55.5, 60.0, 66.4, 74.5.
MS (ESI): m/z = 2318.7 [M – 2 BF4]2+, 1517.0 [M – 3 BF4]3+
1116.4 [M – 4 BF4]4+, 876.3 [M – 5 BF4]5+
,
.
[9] E. Breuning, U. Ziener, J.-M. Lehn, E. Wegelius, K. Rissanen,
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 1515–1521.
[10] A. Semenov, J. P. Spatz, M. Möller, J.-M. Lehn, B. Sell, D.
Schubert, C. H. Weidl, U. S. Schubert, Angew. Chem. 1999,
111, 2701–2705; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 2547–2550.
[11] U. Ziener, J.-M. Lehn, A. Mourran, M. Möller, Chem. Eur. J.
2002, 8, 951–957.
[12] See recent reviews on this method at the solid-liquid interface:
a) S. De Feyter, F. C. De Schryver, J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109,
4290–4302; b) S. De Feyter, M. M. S. Abdel-Mottaleb, N.
Schuurmans, B. J. V. Verkuijl, J. H. v. Esch, B. L. Feringa, F. C.
De Schryver, Chem. Eur. J. 2004, 10, 1124–1132; c) P. Samori,
J. Mater. Chem. 2004, 14, 1353–1366; d) S. De Feyter, F. C. D.
Schryver, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2003, 32, 139–150; e) S. De Feyter,
A. Gesquiere, M. M. Abdel-Mottaleb, P. C. M. Grim, F. C.
De Schryver, C. Meiners, M. Sieffert, S. Valiyaveettil, K.
Müllen, Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 520–531; f) L. C. Giancarlo,
G. W. Flynn, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1998, 49, 297–336; g)
D. M. Cyr, B. Venkataraman, G. W. Flynn, Chem. Mater. 1996,
8, 1600–1615.
STM Investigations: STM measurements were carried out under
ambient conditions with a low-current RHK 1000 control system.
STM imaging of the adlayers was performed at the internal inter-
face between HOPG and a concentrated solution of the ligand 1,
dissolved in 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene, according to the procedure of
Rabe.[13a] A drop of the solution was placed on a freshly cleaved
HOPG surface, while the surface had already been scanned by
STM under the conditions that allowed atomic resolution of the
graphite surface structure. A potential of U = 1 V was applied to
the substrate. The scan rate was varied between 0.2 and 0.6 μms–1.
The tunneling current set point was 8–20 pA. All images presented
were obtained at constant current mode using a Pt/Ir (90:10) tip,
which was mechanically sharpened. Complex 2 was dissolved in
acetonitrile at a concentration less than 1 wt.-%. A drop of the
solution was deposited on a freshly cleaved surface of graphite. The
substrates were dried in the presence of acetonitrile vapor over 1 h
(in a covered Petri dish with a few mL of acetonitrile next to the
sample). Then the sample was taken out of the Petri dish and dried
fully under ambient conditions. The molecular structure of the ad-
layer was probed by STM under air. The distances and angles were
determined by using an internal calibration. The overall error of
[13] Adsorption of long-chain alkanes and related molecules on
HOPG substrates often leads to very well ordered layers that
can be readily imaged at high resolution in the STM investiga-
tion, see: a) J. P. Rabe, S. Buchholz, Science 1991, 253, 424–
2646
© 2005 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 2641–2647