2932
J. M. Elliott et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 16 (2006) 2929–2932
2. Diemunsch, P.; Schoeffler, P.; Bryssine, B.; Cheli-Muller, L.
E.; Lees, J.; McQuade, B. A.; Spraggs, C. F. Br. J. Anaesth.
1999, 82, 274.
3. Albert, J. S. Expert Opin. Ther. Patents 2004, 14, 1421;
Gerspacher, M. Prog. Med. Chem. 2005, 43, 49.
4. Fox, J. M.; Huang, X.; Chieffi, A.; Buchwald, S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 1360.
5. Finke, P. E.; Maccoss, M.; Meurer, L. C.; Mills, S. G.;
Caldwell, C. G.; Chen, P.; Durette, P. L.; Hale, J.; Holson,
E.; Kopka, I.; Robichaud, A. WO9714671, 1997; Chem.
Abstr., 127, 17433.
The biological results for compounds based on both
lactam and fused heterocyclic cores are shown in
Table 1.
High NK1R binding affinity was observed across the
whole series. Introduction of methyl substituents, either
on the ring nitrogen or a- to the lactam was well toler-
ated. In particular, 9c had very high hNK1R affinity.
Good selectivity over affinity for the hERG ion channel
(hIKr) was seen.
6. Selected spectroscopic data. Compound (6a): 1H NMR
(500 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.69 (1H, s), 7.24 (2H, s), 6.92 (2H,
m), 6.83 (2H, m), 5.92 (1H, br m), 4.42 (1H, q, J = 6.5 Hz),
3.43 (1H, m), 3.37 (1H, m), 3.15 (1H, m), 2.76 (1H, t,
J = 9.6 Hz), 2.62 (1H, dd, J = 13.7, 8.6 Hz), 2.49 (1H, t,
J = 13.7 Hz), 2.35 (1H, m), 1.81 (1H, m), and 1.34 (3H, d,
J = 6.5 Hz).
In order to assess their ability to occupy central hNK1
receptors in vivo, selected compounds were profiled for
their ability to inhibit foot tapping in gerbils induced by
central infusion of the NK1R agonist GR73632. This
behavioral response is specific to gerbils, which show
receptor pharmacology similar to the human receptor.
The response is centrally mediated so inhibition demon-
strates that a compound blocks central receptors.9 In or-
der to assess oral bioavailability, compounds were dosed
po 1 h before the agonist challenge (Table 1). Gratify-
ingly, we were able to identify compounds from this ser-
ies which were active at low dose and plasma drug
exposure, indicating both oral bioavailability and brain
penetration. Interestingly, compounds based on the 5,6-
azepin-2-one core (6a, 7a, 9c, and 10c) showed greater
potency than the analogs based on the 4,5-azepin-2-
one (6b, 9a, and 10a). The reasons for such differences
between compounds with similar in vitro affinities are
not clear. Compound 9c was the most potent compound
in this series, one of the most potent compounds from
any series tested to date in this assay.
1
Compound (6b): H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.70 (1H,
s), 7.23 (2H, s), 6.95 (2H, m), 6.82 (2H, m), 6.08 (1H, br m),
4.34 (1H, q, J = 6.4 Hz), 3.43 (1H, m), 3.40 (1H, m), 3.29
(1H, m), 2.88 (1H, t, J = 10.8 Hz), 2.74 (1H, dd, J = 14.0,
10.8 Hz), 2.53 (1H, d, J = 14.0 Hz), 2.33 (1H, m), 1.77 (1H,
m), and 1.31 (3H, d, J = 6.4 Hz).
Compound (11a): 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.73 (1H,
s), 7.393 (2H, s), 6.88–6.71 (6H, m), 4.52 (1H, q,
J = 6.4 Hz), 4.18 (1H, d, J = 14.4 Hz), 3.97 (1H, dd,
J = 14.4, 8.7 Hz), 3.56 (1H, m), 3.48 (1H, dd, J = 14.5,
7.0 Hz), 2.91 (1H, t, J = 8.7 Hz), 2.84 (1H, dd, J = 14.5,
10.2 Hz), 2.26 (1H, m), 1.84 (1H, m), and 1.39 (3H, d,
J = 6.4 Hz).
Compound (11b): 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.72
(1H, s), 7.33 (2H, s), 6.88–6.79 (6H, m), 4.42 (1H, q,
J = 6.4 Hz), 4.25 (1H, dd, J = 14.3, 7.7 Hz), 3.92 (1H,
dd, J = 14.3, 9.6 Hz), 3.60 (1H, m), 3.23 (1H, d,
J = 15.2 Hz), 2.97 (1H, dd, J = 15.2, 10.0 Hz), 2.88
(1H, t, J = 10.0 Hz), 2.33 (1H, m), 1.92 (1H, m), and
1.36 (3H, d, J = 6.4 Hz).
Pendant heterocycles, such as triazolone, are frequently
beneficial in hNK1R antagonists. The presence of lac-
tams in 6a and 6b gave an opportunity to introduce het-
erocycles, but fused to the core rather than pendant.
Both imidazole and triazolone were well tolerated by
the receptor. The imidazoles (11a and 11b) were inactive
in vivo and showed increased hIKr liability. However,
introduction of the triazolone gave compounds with
good in vivo activity and low hIKr affinity (12a and 12b).
Compound (12a): 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD) d 7.75
(1H, s), 7.44 (2H, s), 7.04 (2H, m), 6.81 (2H, m), 4.635
(1H, q, J = 6.4 Hz), 3.91–3.68 (3H, m), 2.95 (1H, m),
2.78 (2H, m), 2.51 (1H, m), 1.73 (1H, m), and 1.33 (3H,
d, J = 6.4 Hz).
Compound (12b): 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 9.95
(1H, s), 7.73 (1H, s), 7.34 (2H, s), 6.93–6.81 (4H, m),
4.44 (1H, q, J = 6.4 Hz), 4.17 (1H, dd, J = 13.8, 7.4 Hz),
3.59 (2H, m), 3.00 (1H, d, J = 15.0 Hz), 2.91 (1H, m),
2.80 (1H, dd, J = 15.0, 10.2 Hz), 2.30 (1H, m), 1.88 (1H,
m), and 1.37 (3H, d, J = 6.4 Hz).
Pharmacokinetic properties were determined for the lac-
tam lead 6a in rat. These indicated that the compound
had moderate clearance (33 mL/min/kg) and good
half-life (5.6 h).
7. Cascieri, M. A.; Ber, E.; Fong, T. M.; Sadowski, S.;
Bansal, A.; Swain, C. J.; Seward, E. M.; Frances, B.;
Burns, D.; Strader, C. D. Mol. Pharmacol. 1992, 42,
458.
In summary, a new class of high affinity hNK1R antag-
onists based on seven-membered ring cores has been
identified. This series, with relatively simple, compact
structures, includes compounds with promising in vivo
properties.
8. Cooper, L. C.; Carlson, E. J.; Castro, J. L.; Chicchi, G.
G.; Dinnell, K.; Di Salvo, J.; Elliott, J.; Hollingworth,
G. J.; Kurtz, M. M.; Ridgill, M. P.; Rycroft, W.; Tsao,
K. L.; Swain, C. J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2002, 12,
1759.
9. Rupniak, N. M. J.; Tattersall, F. D.; Williams, A. R.;
Rycroft, W.; Carlson, E.; Cascieri, M. A.; Sadowski, S.;
Ber, E.; Hale, J. J.; Mills, S. G.; MacCoss, M.;
Seward, E.; Huscroft, I.; Owen, S.; Swain, C. J.; Hill,
R. G.; Hargreaves, R. J. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1997, 326,
201.
References and notes
1. Dando, T. M.; Perry, C. M. Drugs 2004, 64, 777.