Phosphorus-Bridged [1.1]Ferrocenophanes
Organometallics, Vol. 25, No. 4, 2006 885
sphere. The compounds [Fe{(η5-C5H4)P(NEt2)2}2] 1,15 syn-5,5a and
CpNa16 were prepared by literature procedures.
NMR spectra were recorded on a JEOL LA-300 spectrometer.
1H and 13C data were referenced to SiMe4, and 31P NMR data to
85% H3PO4. Photolysis was carried out with Pyrex-glass-filtered
emission from a 400 W mercury arc lamp (Riko-Kagaku Sangyo
UVL-400P). The emission lines in nm used and their relative
intensities (in parentheses) were as follows: 577.0 (69), 546.1 (82),
435.8 (69), 404.7 (42), 365.0 (100), 334.1 (7), 312.6 (38), and 302.2
(9).
Characterization data for the new compounds prepared in this
paper are given in the Supporting Information, and only 31P{1H}
NMR data are provided below. Standard procedures17-20 were
applied to synthesize 8-11; complete experimental details are also
given in the Supporting Information.
Synthesis of 1,1′-Bis(diethylaminochlorophosphino)ferrocene,
2. To a solution of 1 (20.31 g, 38.0 mmol) in hexane (100 mL)
was added PCl3 (6.7 mL, 76.8 mmol) dropwise. After the solution
was stirred overnight, the solvent was removed and the slurry was
washed with cold hexane to remove phosphorus byproducts. The
residue was extracted with hot hexane and dried in vacuo to give
2 as a yellow powder (12.57 g, 72%). 31P{1H} NMR (121.5 MHz,
C6D6): δ 136.5 (s), 136.8 (s).
Figure 5. ORTEP drawing of 11 with 50% thermal ellipsoids.
Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Selected bond distances
(Å) and angles (deg): Mn(1)-P(1) 2.2298(5), Mn(2)-P(2)
2.2328(5), P(1)-C(1) 1.812(2), P(1)-C(11) 1.819(2), P(2)-C(6)
1.817(2), P(2)-C(16) 1.830(2), P(1)-Mn(1)-C(39) 89.95(6),
P(1)-Mn(1)-C(40) 95.47(7), P(2)-Mn(2)-C(47) 92.36(6), P(2)-
Mn(2)-C(48) 92.07(7), Mn(1)-P(1)-C(1) 118.85(6), Mn(1)-
P(1)-C(11) 108.18(6), C(1)-P(1)-C(11) 109.54(8), Mn(2)-P(2)-
C(6) 108.22(6), Mn(2)-P(2)-C(16) 118.08(6), C(6)-P(2)-C(16)
111.14(8), twist angle 72.44(9), 70.41(9).
Synthesis of exo,exo-1,12-Bis(diethylamino)-1,12-diphospha-
[1.1]ferrocenophane, anti-3 and syn-3. To a suspension of 2 (8.32
g, 18.0 mmol) in THF (40 mL) was added dropwise 40 mL of a
THF solution of CpNa (3.19 g, 36.2 mmol) at -50 °C. After stirring
for 30 min, the solution became homogeneous, and then n-BuLi
(2.71 M hexane solution, 13.3 mL, 36.0 mmol) was added dropwise.
The mixture was stirred for 30 min and then added dropwise to a
suspension of FeCl2 (2.40 g, 18.9 mmol) in THF (80 mL) at -50
°C. After stirring overnight, the solvent was removed in vacuo and
the residue was then extracted with hot hexane. The solvent was
removed in vacuo and then washed with cold hexane to give 3
(anti/syn ) 5/4) (4.95 g, 48%) as a yellow powder. Recrystallization
from hexane repeated several times gave a small amount of pure
anti-3. 31P{1H} NMR (121.5 MHz, C6D6): δ 43.8 (s).
Isolation of pure syn-3 was achieved by the reaction of syn-4
prepared as below with 4 equiv of HNEt2 in a MeCN/THF mixture
as follows. To a solution of syn-4 (573 mg, 1.14 mmol) in a mixture
of THF (15 mL) and MeCN (10 mL) was added HNEt2 (0.50 mL,
4.83 mmol) at room temperature. After the reaction mixture was
stirred for 1 h, all volatile components were removed. Then, the
residue was extracted with hexane and dried in vacuo to give syn-3
as a yellow powder (461 mg, 70%). 31P{1H} NMR (121.5 MHz,
C6D6): δ 41.7 (s).
Synthesis of exo,exo,syn-1,12-Dichloro-1,12-diphospha[1.1]-
ferrocenophane, syn-4. To a solution of 3 (45 mg, 0.078 mmol)
in ether (5 mL) was added HCl (1.0 M ether solution, 0.35 mL,
0.35 mmol) at -78 °C. The mixture was stirred for 30 min, and
then the solvent was removed. The residue was extracted with
toluene and dried in vacuo to give syn-4 as a yellow powder (35
mg, 90%). 31P{1H} NMR (121.5 MHz, C6D6): δ 87.3 (s).
Synthesis of exo,exo,syn-1,12-Bis(trimethylsilylmethyl)-1,12-
diphospha[1.1]ferrocenophane, syn-6. To a suspension of syn-4
(1.06 g, 2.12 mmol) in THF was added Me3SiCH2Li (1.0 M solution
of pentane, 4.6 mL, 4.6 mmol) at -78 °C. After stirring for 2.5 h
coordination plane of the Ni center because syn-5 is double-
chained, and thus they should exert a severe steric repulsion on
the two Cl atoms like in 8. The repulsion is, we suppose, a
major reason complex 10 adopts a tetrahedral geometry, in
which no such steric repulsion is anticipated, as seen in Figure
4. In contrast, the low-spin d8 Pd complexes 8 and 9 adopt a
square-planar structure in defiance of the inevitable steric
repulsion mentioned above.
Mn Complex. The photochemical reaction of [Cp′Mn(CO)3]
(Cp′ ) C5H4CH3) with syn-5 yielded the novel cyclic dinuclear
Mn complex 11, [{Cp′Mn(CO)2}2(µ-syn-5)], the molecular
structure of which was determined by X-ray analysis as shown
in Figure 5, where syn-5 is acting as a bridging ligand. The
twist angles of 70.41° and 72.44° are extraordinarily large
compared with those of some structurally characterized [1.1]-
ferrocenophanes7,12 including anti-3 (2.43°), syn-5 itself (24.8°),5a
and complexes 8-10 (9.2-27.2°). It has been confirmed that
CH2-bridged [1.1]ferrocenophane is a very flexible compound
with respect to twisting of the two ferrocene units, and it readily
undergoes anti-to-syn interconversion.13,14 Therefore it is natural
that the two P centers recede readily from each other by the
twisting, so that the bulky Mn fragment may be accommodated
on each P center, giving rise to a very large twist angle in 11
so as to avoid the steric repulsion otherwise anticipated between
1
the two bulky Cp′Mn(CO)2 moieties. H and 13C{1H} NMR
spectra of 11 in CDCl3 were consistent with its X-ray structure.
Experimental Section
General Remarks. All reactions were carried out under an
atmosphere of dry nitrogen using standard Schlenk tube techniques.
Solvents were dried and distilled from sodium (hexane), sodium/
benzophenone (ether, THF, and toluene), or P2O5 (CH2Cl2 and
MeCN). These solvents were stored under a dry nitrogen atmo-
(15) Nifant’ev, I. E.; Boricenko, A. A.; Manzhukova, L. F.; Nifant’ev,
E. E. Phosphorus, Sulfur Silicon 1992, 68, 99-106.
(16) Panda, T. K.; Gamer, M. T.; Roesky, P. W. Organometallics 2003,
22, 877-878.
(12) (a) Schachner, J. A.; Lund, C. L.; Quail, J. W.; Muller, J. Acta
Crystallogr. Sect. E 2005, E61, m682-m684. (b) Braunschweig, H.;
Burschka, C.; Clentsmith, G. K. B.; Kupfer, T.; Radacki, K. Inorg. Chem.
2005, 44, 4906-4908. (c) Schachner, J. A.; Orlowski, G. A.; Quail, J. W.;
Kraatz, H.-B.; Muller, J. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 45, 454-459.
(13) Rudzin˜ski, J. M.; Osawa, E. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 1993, 6, 107-
112.
(17) de Graaf, W.; Boerama, J.; Smeets, W. J. J.; Spek, A. L.; van Koten,
G. Organometallics 1989, 8, 2907-2917.
(18) Van Hecke, G. R.; Horrocks, W. D., Jr. Inorg. Chem. 1966, 5, 1968-
1974.
(19) Meier, U. W.; Thewalt, U.; Debaerdemaeker, T.; Rieger, B. Eur. J.
Inorg. Chem. 2004, 3057-3062.
(20) Onaka, S.; Moriya, T.; Takagi, S.; Mizuno, A.; Furuta, H. Bull.
Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1992, 65, 1415-1427.
(14) Lo¨ewendahl, M.; Davidsson, O¨ .; Ahlberg, P. J. Chem. Res. Synop.
1993, 40-41.