86
A. N. Tretyakov et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 52 (2011) 85–87
Table 1
hydroxypyridines were detected as side products. This contributed
to an overall decrease of products 1a–10a yields despite full con-
version of the starting compounds. Fortunately, hydroxypyridine
impurities were easily removed by washing the reaction mixtures
with aqueous sodium carbonate. Products 1a–10a, after simple
aqueous washing, had high GS–MS and NMR purity and did not
need any additional purification. It should be noted that conven-
tional tosylation of hydroxypyridines with p-toluenesulfonyl
chloride provides known pyridinyl tosylates 1a–3a in low to mod-
erate 55%, 75%, and 20% yields, respectively,4 and in 42% yield for
compound 3a in another example.5
The yield of 2,6-ditosyloxypyridine 11a was lower due to tar
formation during the diazotization. Attempts at selective tosyl-
oxy-dediazotization of only one amino group were not successful
leading to a mixture of starting diamine 11 and pyridinyl tosylate
11a being obtained.
Syntheses of pyridinyl tosylates 1a–11a by diazotization of aminopyridines 1–11 in a
water paste at room temperature (substrate/NaNO2/PTSA, 1:2:3)
Entry
1
Product
Time (h)
3.5
Isolated yield (%)
52
N
OTs
OTs
1a
2a
2
3
1.0
1.0
50
80
N
OTs
N
3a
Br
In general, we did not observe any clear correlation between
reaction time or electronic and steric effects of substituents on
the pyridine ring and the product yields. This situation is rather
common for the diazotization–dediazotization reactions of aro-
matic amines in which substituents may often produce opposite
effects at different stages of the reaction mechanism.11 However,
aminopyridines bearing strong electron-withdrawing groups such
as nitro (e.g., in 2-amino-5-nitropyridine and 3-amino-2-nitropyr-
idine) could not be diazotizated with NaNO2 in water paste. Thus,
the diazotization/tosylation presented is general for aminopyri-
dines bearing moderate electron-donating and withdrawing
substituents.
In summary, we have described a new method for the direct
transformation of aminopyridines into the corresponding pyridinyl
tosylates by diazotization of aminopyridines with sodium nitrite
and PTSA in a water paste at room temperature. The advantages of
this approach are operating simplicity and an aqueous reaction
medium. The yields of the pyridinyl tosylates were comparable with
those obtained using classic procedures (tosylation of hydroxypyri-
dines with p-toluenesulfonyl chloride in organic solvents).
4
5
6
7
2.5
4.5
1.5
1.0
79
69
66
55
N
OTs
4a
I
N
OTs
5a
Br
Br
N
OTs
6a
CH3
N
OTs
7a
CH3
8
9
1.0
55
47
N
OTs
N
8a
12
H3C
OTs
Acknowledgments
9a
CH3
The work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic
Research (project no. 09-03-99019). The authors are grateful to
Dr. Nick Moskalev for constructive criticism and useful remarks.
I
10
11
10
75
20
N
OTs
10a
Supplementary data
Supplementary data (the synthetic procedure and spectral and
analytical data for all compounds are provided) associated with
this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/
2.0
TsO
N
OTs
11a
needed for the conversion to occur. We found that either increas-
ing or decreasing the optimal 1:3 substrate to PTSA molar ratio
led to a decrease in the product yields. For example, the use of
either 1:1 or 1:5 ratios of 2 to PTSA led to a lower yield of
pyridin-3-yl tosylate (2a). The amount of water present in the reac-
tion mixture was very important for successful diazotization/tosy-
lation. Diazotization of aminopyridines 1–11 in aqueous solutions
in the presence of PTSA led predominantely to the corresponding
hydroxypyridines, whereas pyridinyl tosylates 1a–11a were
formed only in trace quantities. In the absence of water, diazotiza-
tion of aminopyridines 1–11 and formation of products 1a–11a
did not occur at all. An increase to 0.1–0.15 mL (5–8 mmol) of
water was not enough to provide full conversion of the aminopyri-
dines. Use of 0.5 mL (30 mmol) of water per 2 mmol of substrate
led to predominant formation of the corresponding pyridinyl
tosylates. However, even when using the given conditions,
References and notes
1. (a) Kobayashi, Y.; Mizojiri, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 8531; (b) Tang, Z.-Y.;
Hu, Q.-S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 3058; (c) Zim, D.; Lando, V. R.; Dupont, J.;
Monteiro, A. L. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3049; (d) Huang, X.; Anderson, K. W.; Zim, D.;
Jiang, L.; Klapars, A.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 6653; (e) Tang,
Z.-Y.; Spinella, S.; Hu, Q.-S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 2427; (f) Limmert, M. E.;
Roy, A. H.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 9364; (g) Furstner, A.; Leitner, A.;
Mendez, M.; Krause, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 13856; (h) Ogata, T.;
Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 13848; (i) Pschierer, J.; Plenio, H. Eur. J.
Org. Chem. 2010, 2934.
2. Lin, W.; Chen, L.; Knochel, P. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 2787.
3. Meshram, H. M.; Madhavi, A. V.; Eeshwaraiah, B.; Reddy, P. N.; Nageswar, Y.;
Rao, V. D.; Yadav, J. S. J. Mol. Catal. A 2007, 272, 57.
4. Cavallito, C. J.; Haskell, T. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1944, 66, 1927.
5. Del Giudice, M. R.; Settimj, G.; Delfini, M. Tetrahedron 1984, 40, 4067.
6. Krasnokutskaya, E. A.; Filimonov, V. D.; Knochel, P.; Semenischeva, N. I.
Synthesis 2007, 81.
7. Gorluschko, D. A.; Filimonov, V. D.; Krasnokutskaya, E. A.; Semenischeva, N. I.;
Go, B. S.; Hwang, H. Y.; Cha, E. H.; Chi, K.-W. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 1080.