(Figure 2). As a result of these efforts, we now report that
primary urea and guanidine derivatives function with general
Subsequent control experiments indicated that a rapid reac-
tion between 1 and PhI(OAc)2 ensues in the absence of Rh
catalyst and/or MgO.9 This process effectively out-competes
the Rh-mediated insertion pathway. As such, we considered
modifying the urea substrates with an electron-withdrawing
group so as to attenuate the unfavorable reaction with PhI-
(OAc)2. Both N-alkyl-N-acylurea 3 and N-alkyl-N-sulfonyl-
urea 4 substrates were synthesized and tested in this
capacity.10 Although the background reaction with oxidant
was indeed avoided, only the trichloroethoxysulfonyl (Tces)
substrate 5 proved effective for oxidative cyclization. The
resulting Tces-blocked imidazolidinone 6 was thus formed,
albeit in modest yield (12%), using 5 mol % of Rh2(O2C-
tBu)4, PhI(OAc)2, and MgO (eq 1).11
Figure 2. Oxidative cyclization of ureas and guanidines.
utility as substrates for this process. With the former class
of starting materials, the products of oxidation can be
elaborated to vicinal diamines.6 Additionally, heterocylic
ureas and guanidines are found as structural elements in a
growing number of complex, biologically efficacious targets,
including a spectacularly diverse family of bromopyrrole
metabolites (Figure 2).7,8 The demonstration that two new
substrate types can engage in C-H amination reactions
affirms the power of this methodology as a unified strategy
for the preparation of structurally disparate molecules.
With our initial success developing carbamate ester
insertion reactions, we anticipated that N-alkylureas would
perform as substrates in an analogous fashion. Phenethylurea
1 was tested under conditions that employed 5 mol % of
Rh2(OAc)4, PhI(OAc)2, and MgO (Figure 3). From this
Prior work from our lab has demonstrated the unique
effectiveness of Rh2(esp)2 for catalyzing both intra- and
intermolecular C-H amination reactions of sulfamate esters.4
We were therefore pleased to find that this complex was
equally adept at promoting high-yielding oxidation of Tces-
urea 5 (Table 1). Other Rh-tetracarboxylates examined, which
Table 1. Evaluating Reaction Conditions for Urea Oxidation
Figure 3. Control experiments and initial test substrates.
a A 5 mol % catalyst charge was employed. b Estimated product
conversion is based on integration of the 1H NMR spectrum of the unpurified
reaction mixture.
reagent mixture, multiple products were generated; none,
however, corresponded to the desired imidazolidin-2-one 2.
included Rh2(O2CCPh3)4 and Rh2(O2C-1-PhcHx)4, gave
reduced product conversions, particularly as the loading was
decreased from 5 to 1 mol %.12 Aside from the identification
of Rh2(esp)2 as an optimal catalyst for this process, the choice
of toluene as solvent was found to be another important factor
contributing to increased reaction yields. It is interesting to
(6) For a general review on vicinal diamine synthesis, see: Lucet, D.;
Le Gall, T.; Mioskowski, C.; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2580-
2627. Also, see: (a) Dunn, P. J.; Ha¨ner, R.; Rapoport, H. J. Org. Chem.
1990, 55, 5017-5025. (b) Jones, R. C. F.; Schofield, J. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 1990, 375-383.
(7) (a) Shue, H.-J.; Chen, X.; Shih, N.-Y.; Blythin, D. J.; Paliwal, S.;
Lin, L.; Gu, D.; Schwerdt, J. H.; Shah, S.; Reichard, G. A.; Piwinski, J. J.;
Duffy, R. A.; Lachowicz, J. E.; Coffin, V. L.; Liu, F.; Nomeir, A. A.;
Morgan, C. A.; Varty, G. B. Biorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15, 3896-
3899. (b) Berlinck, R. G. S.; Kossuga, M. H. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2005, 22,
516-550. (c) Brackeen, M. F.; Cowan, D. J.; Stafford, J. A.; Schoenen, F.
J.; Veal, J. M.; Domanico, P. L.; Rose, D.; Strickland, A. B.; Verghese,
M.; Feldman, P. L. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 4848-4854.
(9) The mixture of unidentified products does not appear to contain any
derived from C-H functionalization.
(10) Espino, C. G. Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 2004.
(11) When conducted with 5 mol % Rh2(OAc)4, the reaction of 5 gives
<10% of the desired product 6. With either catalyst, recovered starting
material accounts for the mass balance in these reactions.
(8) (a) Dembitsky, V. M. Russ. J. Bioorg. Chem. 2002, 28, 170-182.
(b) Al Mourabit, A.; Potier, P. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 237-243.
1074
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 6, 2006