in this structure than 1 and 2, with P(2) and N(1) lying ∼0.17 and
˚
∼0.16 A above and below the mean plane.
To explore further the potential for L to act as a cis-bidentate
diphosphine, its reaction with the [M(CO)4(pip)2] precursors
(M = W or Mo, pip = piperidine) was examined. Complexes of
stoichiometry [W(CO)4L] (4) and [Mo(CO)4L] (5) were isolated af-
ter column chromatography and characterised by microanalytical,
NMR and IR data. The cis-coordination mode is anticipated from
the characteristic pattern10 of carbonyl IR stretching frequencies
[m(CO) cm−1: 2020, 1918, 1892, and 1866 in 4; 2023, 1932, 1900
and 1868 in 5].
The linear bidentate preference of L with Au(I) is interesting
since the Au(I) complexes of ligands that could form chelate
rings of a similar size (for example, the aliphatic carbon bridged
diphosphines) exhibit the monodentate bridging mode.11 The
linear chelating mode is comparable with the trans-spanning
behaviour in complexes of more rigid diphosphines2 although
the structures presented here demonstrate that a flexible bite
angle is available to L that can vary between 100.21(10) and
171.99(3)◦. To our knowledge these complexes are the first struc-
turally characterised cyclotriphosphazene derivatives containing
diphenylphosphine substituents and are also the first structurally
characterised gold complexes of phosphazene based ligands. We
are currently investigating the coordination chemistry of L and
derivatives with other metal ions.
CCDC reference numbers 287631–287633.
For crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see
DOI: 10.1039/b517309b
We thank the RSNZ Marsden Fund (MAU208) for financial
support and the Otsuka Chemical Co. Ltd for a gift of cyclot-
riphosphazene.
Fig. 2 Ortep diagram of [(AuCl)2L] (ellipsoids are drawn at t◦he
˚
50% probability level). Selected bond lengths (A) and angles ( ):
Au(1)–P(4), 2.2256(19); Au(1)–P(5), 2.2244(19); Au(1)–Cl(1)2.282(2);
Au(2)–Cl(2), 2.2890(18); N(1)–P(1), 1.571(5); N(1)–P(2), 1.584(5);
N(2)–P(2) 1.577(6); N(2)–P(3), 1.582(5); N(3)–P(1), 1.572(6); N(3)–P(3),
1.573(5); P(4)–Au(1)–Cl(1), 176.21(7); P(5)–Au(2)–Cl(2), 176.73(6);
O(1)–P(1)–O(2), 103.0(2).
The P–Au–Cl angles are nearly linear [176.73(6) and 176.21(7)◦]
and the Au–P and Au–Cl bond lengths are typical.
The phosphine arms in 2 are orientated such that the Au(I)
˚
centres lie ca. 2.27 and 3.54 A above and below the mean
plane of the phosphazene ring. Consequently the Au(I) atoms
˚
are ∼7.75 A apart and the closest Au · · · Au approach between
˚
adjacent molecules is ∼5.77 A indicating that are no strong
aurophilic interactions in 2 as reported for many other digold
complexes of diphosphines.9 There is a weak interaction between
˚
Au(1) and O(1) [Au(1) · · · O(1) 3.20 A] although the Au(2) · · · O(2)
˚
distance at 3.35 A is greater.
The reaction of L with [Pt(COD)Cl2] in CH2Cl2 affords the
complex [PtLCl2] (3) and crystals¶ of 3·4CH3CN (Fig. 3) were
grown from an acetonitrile solution. In this complex the ligand
coordinates as a cis-chelate diphosphine with a bite angle of
100.21(10)◦ giving a distorted square planar geometry about the
Pt(II) centre. The phosphazene ring is significantly more distorted
Notes and references
‡ Crystal data for C62H47AuBF4N4O6P3: M = 1382.66, triclinic, space
˚
group P-1, a = 12.2010(1), b =◦14.2978(1), c = 17.6740(1) A, a = 69.287(1),
3
˚
b = 83.074(1), c = 67.942(1) , U = 2672.54(3) A , T = 83 K, Z = 2,
Dc = 1.718 g cm−3, F(000) = 1380, l(Mo-K) = 2.977 mm−1, 27712
reflections measured (2.30 < 2h < 51.72), 115701 unique (Rint = 0.0627).
Refinement of 749 parameters converged at R1 = 0.0254 [observed data:
10643 |Fo| > 4r(Fo)], wR(F2) = 0.0637 (all data).
§ Crystal data for C62.7H46.7Au2Cl10.1N3O6P5: M = 1845.06, triclinic, space
˚
group P-1, a = 13.8387(1), b = 14.0919(1), c = 18.3886(1) A, a = 93.237(1),
◦
3
˚
b = 104.527(1), c = 100.185(1) , U = 3397.49(6) A , T = 83 K, Z = 2,
Dc = 1.803 g cm−3, F(000) = 1793, l(Mo-K) = 4.880 mm−1, 30919
reflections measured (2.46 < 2h < 54.08), 12898 unique (Rint = 0.024). For
the solution of 2·2.7CHCl3, the electron density of disordered CHCl3 was
removed from the unit cell using PLATON/SQUEEZE. Approximately
2.7 molecules of CHCl3 per cell were removed (314 e− per cell and 869 A
3
˚
was left by the void). Refinement of 703 parameters converged at R1
0.0498 [observed data: 9596 |Fo| > 4r(Fo)], wR(F2) = 0.1295 (all data).
¶ Crystal data for C68H56Cl2N7O6P5Pt: M = 1488.04, monoclinic, space
=
˚
group P2◦(1)/c, a = 13.5768(2), b = 11.1807(2), c = 42.2143(2) A, b =
3
−3
˚
98.811(1) , U = 6348.60(15) A , T = 83 K, Z = 4, Dc = 1.557 g cm
,
F(000) = 2992, l(Mo-K) = 2.480 mm−1, 28324 reflections measured
(5.78 < 2h < 46.52), 9094 unique (Rint = 0.1263). Refinement of 806
parameters converged at R1 = 0.0660 [observed data: 5816 |Fo| > 4r(Fo)],
wR(F2) = 0.1384 (all data).
1 I. Ojima, Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis, Wiley, New York, 2000; P. C.
Kamer, A. Van Rooy, G. C. Schoemaker and P. W. N. M. Van Leeuwen,
Coord. Chem. Rev., 2004, 248, 2409–2424; W. Tang and X. Zhang,
Chem. Rev., 2003, 103, 3029–3070; Z. Frexia and P. W. N. M. Van
Leeuwen, Dalton Trans., 2003, 10, 1890–1901.
2 C. A. Bessel, P. Aggarwal, A. C. Marschilok and K. J. Takeuchi, Chem.
Rev., 2001, 101, 1031–1066; Z. Frexia, M. S. Beentjes, G. D. Batema,
Fig. 3 Ortep diagram of [PtLCl2] (ellipsoids are drawn at the 50%
probability level). Selected bond lengths (A) and angles ( ): Pt(1)–P(4),
2.261(3); Pt(1)–P(5), 2.266(3); Pt(1)–Cl(1), 2.334(3); Pt(1)–Cl(2), 2.358(3);
N(1)–P(1), 1.600(9); N(1)–P(2), 1.586(8); N(2)–P(2) 1.577(9); N(2)–P(3),
1.602(9); N(3)–P(1), 1.578(8); N(3)–P(3), 1.567(8); P(4)–Au(1)–P(5),
100.21(10); Cl(1)–Pt(1)–Cl(2), 87.85(9); O(1)–P(1)–O(2), 97.1(4).
◦
˚
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2006
Dalton Trans., 2006, 1264–1266 | 1265
©