Angewandte
Communications
Chemie
functionalization, as well as direct access to primary aromatic
amines.
increased to 56% when 2 equivalents of benzophenone imine
and 3 equivalents of K3PO4 were used (entry 12).
Therefore, our initial experiments in developing the new
decarbonylative amination started with phenyl naphthalene-
2-carboxylate (1a) and commercially available benzophe-
none imine (2; Table 1). Among the different metals tested,
LiCl as a Lewis acid additive was found to have
a beneficial effect on our decarbonylative amination, and
may be due to coordination to the carbonyl group (Table 1,
entry 13). Extending the reaction time and increasing the
temperature slightly, significantly improved the yield
(entries 14 and 15). Under the optimized reaction conditions
the desired product was isolated in 87% yield upon acidic
hydrolysis. A slightly lower yield (80%) was obtained with
Ni(OAc)2·4H2O as the catalyst (entry 18). Control experi-
ments showed that no amination product was observed in the
absence of [Ni(cod)2] or dcype ligand (entries 16 and 17).
When secondary amines, such as morpholine were used, the
aminolysis reaction of the ester substrate occurred, thus
affording the undesired amide product 4.[13] Other esters such
as methyl and benzyl esters were not suitable for this
transformation as it allows for a chemoselective amination
of differently protected esters (Scheme 2).
Table 1: Optimization of the reaction conditions.[a]
Entry
[Ni]
Ligand
(x mol%)
Base
(2 equiv)
Additive
(2 equiv)
Yield
[%][b]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
[Ni(cod)2]
[Ni(cod)2]
[Ni(cod)2]
[Ni(cod)2]
[Ni(cod)2]
[Ni(cod)2]
[Ni(cod)2]
[Ni(cod)2]
[Ni(cod)2]
[Ni(cod)2]
[Ni(cod)2]
[Ni(cod)2]
[Ni(cod)2]
[Ni(cod)2]
[Ni(cod)2]
[Ni(cod)2]
–
IPr·HCl (20)
PnBu3 (20)
PCy3 (20)
dcype (10)
dcypf (10)
dcype (20)
dcype (20)
dcype (20)
dcype (20)
dcype (20)
dcype (20)
dcype (20)
dcype (20)
dcype (20)
dcype (20)
–
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
Li2CO3
K2CO3
Na2CO3
K3PO4
NaOtBu
K3PO4
K3PO4
K3PO4
K3PO4
K3PO4
K3PO4
K3PO4
K3PO4
K3PO4
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
LiCl
LiCl
LiCl
LiCl
LiCl
–
0
0
0
14
trace
17
21
31
31
42
0
56
63
84
87
0
9
10
11
12[c]
13[c]
14[c,d]
15[c–e]
16[c–e]
17[c–e]
18[c–e]
19[c–e]
20[c–e]
dcype (20)
dcype (20)
dcype (20)
dcype (20)
0
Ni(OAc)2
Ni(OAc)2
Ni(OAc)2
80
63
77
Mn[f]
Et3SiH[g]
Scheme 2. Nickel-catalyzed decarbonylative amination of the naphthyl
ester 1a.
[a] IPr·HCl=1,3-bis(2,6- diisopropylphenyl)imidazolium chloride,
dcype=1,2-bis(dicyclohexylphosphino)-ethane, dcypf=1,1’-bis(dicyclo-
hexylphosphino) ferrocene. Reaction conditions: phenyl naphthalene-2-
carboxylate (1a; 0.2 mmol), benzophenone imine 2 (0.3 mmol), [Ni-
(cod)2] (0.02 mmol), ligand (0.02 mmol or 0.04 mmol), base (0.4 mmol)
in toluene (1 mL) at 1608C, 12 h. [b] Yield of isolated products.
[c] Benzophenone imine 2 (2 equiv), K3PO4 (3 equiv). [d] 48 h. [e] 1708C.
[f] Mn powder (1.5 equiv). [g] Et3SiH (20 mol%). cod=1,5-cycloocta-
diene.
With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, the scope
with respect to the aryl esters was examined (Table 2). The
results show that a range of aromatic and heteroaromatic
esters having various substitution patterns were tolerated in
this newly developed ester to amine transformation, thus
giving the corresponding primary amines in moderate to high
yields. As anticipated, naphthyl esters (1a–c) underwent this
decarbonylative amination protocol in good to high yields.
nickel complexes proved to be good catalysts for the
decarbonylation. The nature of the ligand critically affected
the efficiency of our transformation. No reaction occurred
when IPr·HCl was applied as a ligand (entry 1). The use of
monodentate phosphine ligands such as P(n-Bu)3 and PCy3
also gave no desired product (entries 2 and 3). However,
bidentate phosphine ligands were suitable for this reaction
and 14% yield was obtained when 1,2-bis (dicyclohexylphos-
phino)ethane (dcype) was used. Increasing the ratio of nickel
to bidentate phosphine ligand from 1:1 to 1:2 was beneficial
for this transformation (entry 4 versus 6). Various bases were
next examined and K3PO4 was found to be the optimal choice.
Reactions in the presence of other bases gave either lower
yields (Li2CO3, K2CO3, Na2CO3), or even no desired product
(NaOtBu), and indicated that the base plays a crucial role in
this reaction (entries 6–11). The yield of the coupling product
À
Although protocols for the amination of the C OMe bond
under nickel catalysis have been reported,[4] we were pleased
to find that methoxy groups are well tolerated in our
amination protocol (3c and 3j). Furthermore, not only
simple biphenyl ester gave the desired products (3e and 3 f)
in good yields, but also a series of biphenyl ester derivatives
possessing fluoro (1g), trifluoromethyl (1h), and tertiary
butyl substituents (1i) efficiently underwent this transforma-
tion. Simple phenyl derivatives are more challenging sub-
strates than p-extended systems.[3e] However, we were pleased
to find that under our catalytic system, simple phenyl ester
derivatives, possessing either electron-donating or electron-
withdrawing functional groups, could be converted into the
corresponding amines in moderate to good yields. The
chemoselectivity of this new amination protocol was nicely
2
ꢀ 2017 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 1 – 5
These are not the final page numbers!