C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 1. Isotropic 13C Chemical Shifts of Rhodopsin (δrho) and
Bathorhodopsin (δbatho) As Found in This Worka
13C site
δ
rho/ppm
δ
batho/ppm
∆δ/ppm
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
148.9
127.9
141.4
131.8
167.4
122.3
165.4
149.6
137.3
144.4
132.8
171.2
117.5
164.4
+ 0.7
+ 9.4
+ 3.0
+ 1.0
+ 3.8
-4.8
-1.0
a The last column shows the isomerization shift, ∆δ ) δbatho - δrho
.
All chemical shifts have a confidence limit of (0.5 ppm and are
referenced indirectly to TMS using the rhodopsin shift data in ref 16.
The isotropic 13C chemical shifts of the C9 to C15 sites in
bathorhodopsin are summarized in Table 1. The +9.4 ppm
isomerization shift of C10 is particularly striking. The isomerization
shifts tend to be in the deshielding direction toward the center of
the chain but in the shielding direction at the end of the chain.
Comparisons with previous NMR data and with numerical shift
calculations are presented in the Supporting Information.
We are currently in the process of interpreting the bathorhodopsin
chemical shifts. The isomerization shifts of the odd-numbered
carbons might be interpreted in terms of the small displacement of
the negatively charged counterion from the vicinity of the positively
charged protonated Schiff base linkage, while the isomerization
shifts of the even-numbered carbons are due to the torsional twists.
Figure 2. Double-quantum filtered 13C NMR spectra of (a) [9,10-13C2],
(b) [11,12-13C2], (c) [12,13-13C2], (d) [14,15-13C2] rhodopsin before (above)
and after (below) 10 h of illumination with 420 ( 5 nm light. All spectra
are the Fourier transforms of ∼12 000 NMR signals acquired at a
temperature <120 K with magic-angle spinning at 7.00 ( 0.05 kHz. The
positions of the bathorhodopsin signals are indicated by asterisks.
Acknowledgment. This research was supported by BBSRC
(UK), EPSRC (UK), NWO (NL), CMSB (NL), and EC E-MeP
(NL). We thank M. Carravetta, P. Jansson, J. James, H. J. M. de
Groot, I. Heinmaa, D. Sebastiani, and K. Komatsu for technical
and experimental help, data, discussions, and samples.
isomer isorhodopsin.13 These conditions were optimized by nu-
merical finite-element simulations of the light penetration through
the optically dense sample, as described elsewhere.
Supporting Information Available: Full refs 15 and 16, sample
preparation, NMR equipment, temperature calibration data, chemical
shift comparisons, and experimental procedures. This material is
The sample temperature is difficult to determine in magic-angle-
spinning experiments, due to frictional heating and warming caused
by the rotor bearing and drive nitrogen gas streams. As described
in the Supporting Information, the sample temperature was
calibrated during the illumination and acquisition of the NMR data
using the 207Pb chemical shift of lead nitrate,14 using the narrow
proton resonance of the endohedral dihydrogen-fullerene complex
H2@C60 as an independent chemical shift reference.15 The sample
temperature was found to exceed the temperature of the exiting
nitrogen gas by up to 40 K. The new results are clearly more reliable
than those obtained in 19913 using a vulnerable experimental and
data subtraction procedure.
As shown in Figure 2, double-quantum filtered NMR spectra
obtained after illumination show a clear splitting of at least one of
the 13C peaks, indicating the generation of bathorhodopsin. The
∼35% bathorhodopsin yield is probably limited by the partial
penetration of light into the optically dense particles and by
secondary photoisomerization of bathorhodopsin.
References
(1) Palczewski, K. Annu. ReV. Biochem. 2006, 75, 743–767.
(2) Rodieck, R. W. The First Step in Seeing; Sinauer Associates: Sunderland,
MA, 1998.
(3) Smith, S. O.; Courtin, J.; de Groot, H. J. M.; Gebhard, R.; Lugtenburg, J.
Biochemistry 1991, 30, 7409–7415.
(4) Nakamichi, H.; Okada, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 4270–4273.
(5) Schreiber, M.; Buss, V. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2003, 95, 882–889.
(6) Yan, E. C. Y.; Ganim, Z.; Kazmi, M. A.; Chang, B S. W.; Sakmar, T P.;
Mathies, R. A. Biochemistry 2004, 43, 10867–10876.
(7) Gascon, J. A.; Sproviero, E. M.; Batista, V. S. Acc. Chem. Res. 2006, 39,
184–193.
(8) Schreiber, M.; Sugihara, M.; Okada, T.; Buss, V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2006, 45, 4274–4277.
(9) Ro¨hrig, U. F.; Sebastiani, D. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112, 1267–1274.
(10) Ro¨hrig, U. F.; Guidoni, L.; Laio, A.; Frank, I.; Rothlisberger, U. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 15328–15329.
(11) Groesbeek, M.; Lugtenburg, J. J. Photochem. Photobiol. 1996, 56, 903–
908.
(12) Mar´ın Montesinos, I.; Brouwer, D. H.; Antonioli, G.; Lai, W. C.;
Brinkmann, A.; Levitt, M. H. J. Magn. Reson. 2005, 117, 307–317.
(13) Birge, R. R.; Einterz, C. M.; Knapp, H. M.; Murray, L. P. Biophys. J.
1988, 53, 367–385.
(14) Neue, G.; Dybowski, C. Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson. 1997, 4, 333–
336.
(15) Carravetta, M.; et al. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2007, 9, 4879–4894.
(16) Verhoeven, M. A.; et al. Biochemistry 2001, 40, 3282–3288.
The new 13C peaks that appeared after illumination were replaced
by broader signals at positions closer to the rhodopsin peaks when
the temperature of the illuminated sample was allowed to warm
above 125 K for several hours. This observation supports their
assignment as being due to bathorhodopsin.
JA803801U
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 32, 2008 10491