Table 1. Survey of Reaction Conditions
molar ratio
(1:2:3)
facial selectivitya
((4a + 4a′):4a′′)
isomer ratioa
(4a:4a′)
unreacted
2 (equiv)a
yield (%)b
(4a + 4a′)
entry
base 3
1c
n-BuLi
1.0:1.2:1.2
1.0:1.2:1.2
1.0:1.2:1.2
1.0:1.2:1.2
1.0:1.0:1.05
99:1
99:1
99:1
99:1
99:1
1:1.6
1:1.9
1:2.2
1:1.3
1:2.0
0.14
0.14
0.19
0.19
trace
95
98
99
99
99
2c
LHMDS
LHMDS
LHMDS
LHMDS
3c,d
4e
5e
a Facial selectivity, isomer ratio, and unreacted 2 were determined by 19F NMR spectroscopy of the crude products. Compounds 4a (-179 ppm) and 4a′
(-188 ppm) were also identified by 19F NMR. b Isolated yield of 4a and 4a′. c Method A: The mixture of base and 2 was stirred at -78 °C for 3 min, then
1a was added. d The reaction temperature was -90 °C. e Method B: The base was added dropwise into the mixture of 1a, 2, and THF at -78 °C.
Nucleophilic fluoroalkylation is a straightforward way to
introduce fluoroalkyl groups into the target molecules, and
with this strategy both nucleophilic trifluoromethylation and
difluoromethylation have been tamed.12 To the best of our
knowledge, however, owing to the lack of efficient nucleo-
philic monofluoromethylating agents, nucleophilic mono-
fluoromethylation (nucleophilic incorporation of a CH2F
group into electrophiles) has never been reported. As part
of our continuing effort in selective fluoroalkylation chem-
istry,13 we wish to disclose the unprecedented stereoselective
synthesis of R-monofluoromethylamines by nucleophilic
monofluoromethylation of Ellman’s N-(tert-butanesulfinyl)-
imines14 using fluoromethyl phenyl sulfone (PhSO2CH2F)15
as the monofluoromethylating agent.
reaction with fluoromethyl phenyl sulfone 2. The reaction
conditions were carefully tuned as shown in Table 1. In all
cases, the facial selectivities [(4a + 4a′):4a′′], i.e., the
diastereoselectivity during the nucleophilic addition of in situ
generated (phenylsulfonyl)fluoromethyl anion into imine
functionality of 1a, were excellent (99:1). The absolute
configuration of sulfinamide 4a was confirmed by single-
crystal X-ray analysis (see Figure 1), which indicates that
In the first set of experiments, we chose (R)-(tert-butane-
sulfinyl)benzaldimine 1a as a model compound to study the
(8) Alvernhe, G.; Lacombe, S.; Laurent, A. J. Fluorine Chem. 1980, 16,
526-527.
(9) Bey, P.; Gerhart, F.; Jung, M. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 2835-2838.
(10) (a) Kanai, M.; Ueda, K.; Yasumoto, M.; Kuriyama, Y.; Inomiya,
K.; Ootsuka, T.; Katsuhara, Y.; Higashiyama, K.; Ishii, A. J. Fluorine Chem.
2005, 126, 377-383. (b) Bravo, P.; Cavicchio, G.; Crucianelli, M.; Poggiali,
A.; Zanda, M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1997, 8, 2811-2815.
(11) (a) Ok, D.; Fisher, M. H.; Wyvratt, M. J.; Meinke, P. T. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1999, 40, 3831-3834. (b) Posakony, J. J.; Tewson, T. J. Synthesis
2002, 766-770.
(12) Prakash, G. K. S.; Hu, J. New Nucleophilic Fluoroalkylation
Chemistry. In Fluorine-Containing Synthons; Soloshonok, V. A., Ed.;
American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 2005, and references therein.
(13) Li, Y.; Hu, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 5882-5886.
(14) Ellman, J. A.; Owens, T. D.; Tang, T. P. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002,
35, 984-995 and references therein.
(15) Fluoromethyl phenyl sulfone is commercially available, and it can
also be readily prepared with known methods. It has been used to prepare
fluoroolefins. However, its application as a CH2F- equivalent has never
been reported. See: (a) Matthews, D. P.; Persichetti, R. A.; McCarthy, J.
R. Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 1994, 26, 605-608. (b) Inbasekaran, M.; Peet,
N.; McCarthy, J. R. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1985, 678-679.
Figure 1. ORTEP drawing for sulfinamide 4a.
the stereochemistry of nucleophilic addition was nonchelation
controlled.13,14 Interestingly, we found that there were some
moderate stereoselectivities (4a:4a′) 1:1.3-2.2) during the
formation of another neighboring stereogenic center (the
fluorine-bearing carbon). The chemical yields of all experi-
1694
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 8, 2006