and Maslak,6c who established that a methylsulfonyl radical
reacts with allyltrimethylsilane 2.5 times faster than with hex-
1-ene at 0 °C. Although this polar effect may reflect in part the
regioisomer ratio, other factors may be operative. Attack of a
sulfonyl radical on the allylsilane moiety generates a radical â
to silicon (C2) which is known to be stabilized by 2-3 kcal/
mol.8 Such a weak stabilization may, however, be sufficient to
slow the â-fragmentation process, so that concentration of
intermediate A is more important than that of A′. Rate constants
for â-fragmentation of p-tosyl radical have been estimated in
TABLE 1. Regioselectivity of the Selenosulfonylation of Dienes
3a-d
the range 103-106 s-1 7a
the lower rate being observed with
,
entry
diene 3
solvent
T (°C)
4/5c
yieldd (%)
compounds possessing a substituent able to stabilize the radical
intermediate. Although a â-silyl group does not exert such a
strong â-stabilization, this and the polar effect discussed above
may be sufficient to control the regioselectivity. Then, assuming
than A and A′ cyclize at a similar rate (kc ≈ k′c), accumulation
of the former would ensure the formation of larger amount of
4a-d in the mixture of products. The possibility that B and B′
might interconvert through an intramolecular tosyl group transfer
has also been ruled out based on the results of kinetic studies
on related processes.3a Chairlike conformations such as A and
A′ having the bulky silicon group in pseudoequatorial position
explain the high level of stereocontrol observed and the relative
configuration observed for regioisomers 4a-d and 5a-d.2 In
contrast, the nature of the effects controlling the regioselectivity
of the process at higher temperature (between rt and 80 °C)
appears more difficult to rationalize. Although the allylsilane
olefin is sterically more demanding, this factor is probably not
predominant as the reaction occurs on a site (C1) remote from
the bulky silicon group. An alternative explanation may be
provided, based on a kinetic versus thermodynamic control. At
higher temperature, fragmentation would be faster9 and A and
A′ would thus reach the equilibrium. The regioisomer ratio
would then only rely on the relative energies of cyclization
transition states (Curtin-Hammett regime). When A and A′ are
structurally similar (as is the case with 3a,b having no
substituent at C5), such transition-state energies should be very
close,10 leading to low regiocontrol as is observed experimentally
(Entries 1, 2, and 4-6). Finally, under such conditions a better
regiocontrol in the favor of cyclopentanes 5 (entries 8 and 11)
is only observed when an OH group is present at C5. The exact
nature of the effect of this OH group remains speculative at
this stage, but its presence modifies the reactivity of the â-radical
center, leading to a stabilization of the transition state of
cyclization A′ f B′.2b,8e
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
3a
3a
3a
3b
3b
3b
3b
3c
3c
3c
3d
3d
C6H6
C6H6
CH2Cl2
C6H6
C6H6
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
C6H6
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
C6H6
80a
24b
38:62
45:55
90:10
38:62
56:44
53:47
77:23
25:75
55:45
85:15
11:89
90:10
53
63
58
92
86
85
80
49
70
87
50
61
-70b
80a
24b
24b
-70b
80a
24b
10
11
12
-70b
80a
CH2Cl2
-70b
a AIBN. b hν (sunlamp). c Estimated ratio through 1H NMR of the crude
reaction mixture. d Isolated yield of both isomers.
SCHEME 2. Selenium Group Transfer during
Selenosulfonyation of 3d
and highly stereoselective. The study was then extended to
precursors 3c,d possessing an allylic alcohol function (entries
8-12). As before, good regiocontrol and better yields were
observed at low temperature, with cyclopentanes 4c,d obtained
as major isomers in each case (entries 10 and 12). At 80 °C, a
reversal of regiocontrol was again observed with regioisomers
5c,d formed predominantly. Cyclization of 3d also led at -70
°C to addition product 6d with the stereochemistry as shown
(Scheme 2).5 Although the formation of 6d was poorly
reproducible, this indicates that at low temperature the cycliza-
tion is slow, with the selenium group transfer becoming a
competitive process.
A general trend thus emerges from these results. At low
temperature, the sulfonyl radical species prefers to react at the
allylsilane terminus while at higher temperature the reaction
occurs on the less sterically demanding olefin. Two different
pathways may thus be drawn, as summarized in Figure 1. At
low temperature, the addition of the electrophilic sulfonyl radical
would occur preferentially on the more electron-rich allylsilane
olefin (k1 > k′1, polar effect),6,7 leading to a radical â to silicon
(i.e., A). Such a polar effect has been well studied by Gozdz
This work thus demonstrates that sulfonyl radical addition
to 1,6-dienes possessing olefins of similar reactivities proceeds
yet regioselectively in the first step and is followed by a
stereocontrolled cyclization in the second step to provide useful
polysubstituted cyclopentanes.
The selenosulfonylation was then extended to diene 7 having
two differently substituted olefins.11 Surprisingly, when submit-
(5) The syn relative configuration between SiMe2Ph and SePh was
assigned on the basis of related studies; see: (a) Chabaud, L.; Landais, Y.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 6995-6998. (b) Masterson, D. S.; Porter, N.
D. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 4253-4256. (c) Chabaud, L.; Landais, Y.; Renaud,
P. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 4257-4260.
(6) (a) Sakurai, H.; Hosomi, A.; Kumada, M. J. Org. Chem. 1969, 34,
1764-1768. (b) Jarvie, A. W. P.; Rowley, R. J. J. Chem. Soc. B 1971,
2439-2442. (c) Gozdz, A. S.; Maslak, P. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 2179-
2189.
(8) (a) Kawamura, T.; Kochi, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 648-
650. (b) Griller, D.; Ingold, K. U. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 6715-
6720. (c) Jackson, R. A.; Ingold, K. U.; Griller, D.; Nazran, A. S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 208-211. (d) Auner, N.; Walsh, R.; Westrup, J. J.
Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1986, 207-207. (e) d’Antuono, P.; Fritsch,
A.; Ducasse, L.; Castet, F.; James, P.; Landais, Y. J. Phys. Chem. A 2006,
110, 3714-3722.
(9) As mentioned by one referee, fragmentation of the tosyl group is
probably more affected than the 5-exo-trig cyclization by lowering the
temperature due to entropy effects.
(7) (a) Timokhin, V. I.; Gastaldi, S.; Bertrand, M.-P.; Chatgilialoglu, C.
J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 3532-3537. (b) Wagner, P. J.; Sedon, J. H.;
Lindstrom, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 2579-2580.
(10) Lusztyk, J.; Maillard, B.; Deycard, S.; Lindsay, D. A.; Ingold, K.
U. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 3509-3514.
J. Org. Chem, Vol. 71, No. 9, 2006 3631