A R T I C L E S
Liu and Hartwig
auxiliary44 was used to determine diastereoselectivities and was prepared
by literature procedures.
with palladium, and the fluoride from silicon could be returned
to the resulting zinc bromide to regenerate the zinc fluoride.
Representive Procedure for the Arylation of Silyl Ketene Acetals.
Methyl phenylisobutyrate (Table 2, entry 1).15 To a screw-capped
vial containing PtBu3 (40 µL of a 0.500 M solution in toluene, 0.020
mmol), Pd(dba)2 (5.8 mg, 0.010 mmol), ZnF2 (52.0 mg, 0.500 mmol),
and phenyl bromide (157.0 mg, 1.000 mmol) was added tert-butyl
trimethylsilyl methyl ketene acetal (301.0 mg, 1.49 mmol), followed
by DMF (4.0 mL). The vial was sealed with a cap containing a PTFE
septum and removed from the drybox. The heterogeneous reaction
mixture was stirred at 80 °C for 12 h. The crude reaction was then
allowed to cool to room temperature and diluted with Et2O (50 mL).
The resulting solution was washed with H2O (5 × 20 mL). The organic
phase was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated at reduced
pressure. The residue was then purified by chromatography on silica
gel, eluting with a 1-2% gradient of EtOAc in hexane to provide the
Conclusions
The arylation of the preformed silicon enolates in the presence
of zinc additives in DMF provides a process that is comple-
mentary to previously published arylation of alkali metal
enolates and Reformatsky reagents. This procedure tolerates
various functional groups, such as nitro, cyano, ester, and ketone
substituents, on the aryl bromide. Furthermore, the thermal
stability of the silicon enolates makes them suitable for the first
formation of R-aryl-R-alkoxy esters by coupling of the corre-
sponding enolates with aryl halides. On the other hand, these
reactions are slower than those of the alkali metal enolates and
Reformatsky reagents and require polar solvents. Thus, each
method displays advantages, and the combination of methods
provides a catalytic route to a variety of R-aryl ester derivatives.
1
title compound (162 mg) in 91% yield. H NMR (CDCl3): δ 7.27-
7.38 (5H, m), 3.69 (3H, s), 1.62 (6H, s). 13C NMR (CDCl3): δ 177.72,
145.08, 128.85, 127.15, 126.02, 52.64, 46.94, 26.98.
Arylation of Trimethylsilyl Ketenimines of the Evans Auxiliary.
(4S,2′S)-4-Isopropyl-3-(2′-phenyl-propanoyl)oxazolidin-2-one (Table
3, Entries 1, 2).58 To a screw-capped vial containing PtBu3 (0.500 M
solution in toluene, 200 µL, 0.010 mmol), Pd(dba)2 (29 mg, 0.050
mmol), ZnF2 (52 mg, 0.50 mmol), and phenyl bromide (157 mg, 1.00
mmol) were added the trimethylsilyl enolate 2 of the Evans imide (370.0
mg, 1.44 mmol), followed by DMF (10 mL). The vial was sealed with
a cap containing a PTFE septum and removed from the drybox. The
heterogeneous reaction mixture was stirred at 80 °C for 12 h. The crude
reaction was then allowed to cool to room temperature and diluted with
Et2O. The resulting solution was washed with H2O. The organic phase
was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated at reduced pressure.
Purification of the crude material by flash chromatography, eluting with
The development of conditions for the arylation of silicon
ester enolates has allowed the preparation of products with
stereogenic centers R to the carbonyl group. We have developed
two processes with substrates bearing established chiral auxil-
iaries, and the diastereomeric ratios have been shown to reflect
kinetic selectivities. Significant diastereoselectivities have been
observed for the arylation of imides bearing the Evans auxiliary.
These reactions provide an enantioselective synthesis of tertiary
R-aryl acids. In addition, excellent diastereoselectivities were
achieved from the arylation of Ley’s auxiliary, and this reaction
provides an enantioselective synthesis of R-arylated R-hydroxy
esters. Successful diastereoselective arylation with these aux-
iliaries suggests that this methodology may be conducted with
silicon enolates of other carbonyl derivatives bearing chiral
auxiliaries and can be applied to the synthesis of structurally
complex products, even at the latter stages of a synthesis. A
related reaction was employed previously in the synthesis of a
leukotriene B4 antagonist.30 Use of the catalyst and additive of
the current work would increase the efficiency of the coupling
step of this synthesis and would simplify the experimental
procedures.
1
2% EtOAc in hexanes, gave 67% yield of the R-aryl imide. H NMR
(CDCl3): δ 7.27 (2H, d, J ) 7.4 Hz), 7.22 (2H, t, J ) 7.3 Hz), 7.15
(1H, t, J ) 7.3 Hz), 5.06 (1H, q, J ) 7.0 Hz), 4.25-4.28 (1H, m),
4.00-4.07 (2H, m), 2.33-2.37 (1H, m), 1.43 (3H, d, J ) 7.0 Hz),
0.84 (3H, d, J ) 6.6 Hz), 0.82 (3H, d, J ) 6.1 Hz). 13C NMR
(CDCl3): δ 175.04, 153.99, 140.72, 128.98, 128.56, 127.59, 63.50,
59.43, 43.45, 28.94, 20.09, 18.42, 15.11.
Experimental Procedure for the Evaluation of Epimerization
during the r-Arylation. To a screw-capped vial containing PtBu3
(0.500 M solution in toluene, 20 µL, 0.010 mmol), Pd(dba)2 (2.9 mg,
0.0050 mmol), ZnF2 (5.2 mg, 0.050 mmol), and phenyl bromide (15.7
mg, 0.100 mmol) were added the trimethylsilyl enolate 2 of the Evans
imide (37.0 mg, 0.144 mmol) and compound 1 (>90% de),58 followed
by DMF (1.0 mL). The vial was sealed with a cap containing a PTFE
septum and removed from the drybox. The heterogeneous reaction
mixture was stirred at 80 °C for 12 h. The crude reaction was then
allowed to cool to room temperature and diluted with Et2O (5.0 mL).
The resulting solution was washed with H2O (5 × 2.0 mL). The organic
phase was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated at reduced
Experimental Section
General Methods. Reactions were conducted using standard drybox
1
techniques. H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded in CDCl3 on a
400 MHz spectrometer with tetramethylsilane or residual protiated
solvent used as a reference and coupling constants reported in hertz
(Hz). Chromatographic purifications were performed by flash chro-
matography using silica gel (200-400 mesh) or using an automated
chromatography system. Yields for final products in all tables refer to
isolated yields and are the average of two runs. Products that had been
reported previously were isolated in greater than 95% purity, as
1
pressure. The residue was then analyzed by H NMR spectroscopy.
Only one set of signals was observed for compound 1 and its
1
(2′)epimer.58 From integration of the H NMR signals, the diastereo-
1
determined by H NMR and capillary gas chromatography (GC). All
meric ratio of the isopropyl derivative formed from the R-arylation
was 88:12. The same reaction on a 1.00 mmol scale in the absence of
the added R-aryl imide provided the major diastereomer in 67% yield
after purification by flash chromatography eluting with 2% EtOAc in
hexanes.
13C NMR spectra were proton decoupled. GC analyses were obtained
with a DB-1301 narrow bore column for high-temperature ramp
applications (max 120 °C/min). Methyl trimethylsilyl ketene acetal,
ZnF2, and Zn(OtBu)2 were purchased from commercial suppliers. The
silyl ketene acetal of tert-butyl propionate55 and the trimethylsilyl ether
derivative of the Evans auxiliary56 were prepared according to literature
procedures. The racemic version57 of the available nonracemic Ley
Representative Procedures for the Arylation of the Ley Auxiliary.
5,6-Dimethoxy-5,6-dimethyl-3-phenyl-[1,4]dioxan-2-one (Table 5,
Entries 1, 2).57 5,6-Dimethoxy-5,6-dimethyl-[1,4]dioxan-2-one 844,57
(1.00 g, 5.26 mmol) was dissolved in anhydrous THF (20 mL), and
(55) Hoffman, R.; Kim, H. O. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 3855.
(56) Fuentes, L. M.; Shinkai, I.; Salzmann, T. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108,
4675.
(58) Fukuzawa, S.; Chino, Y.; Yokoyama, T. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2002,
13, 1645.
(57) Ley, S. V.; Michel, P. Synlett 2001, 11, 1793.
9
5190 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 126, NO. 16, 2004