3624 J. Agric. Food Chem., Vol. 46, No. 9, 1998
Webster et al.
filtered through a 0.2 µm PTFE membrane (Gelman Acrodisc,
25 mm diameter) and applied to the top of the column. When
the Celite became saturated, the mobile phase (chloroform/
ethyl acetate/methanol 5:5:1) was pumped onto the column at
8 mL/min and gradually slowed to 2 mL/min over a 4 h period.
The dry column tube was then laid on a glass plate and
examined under a 254 nm light.
The yellow band was removed from the column and ex-
tracted with 700 mL of methanol. The extract was filtered
through a 12.5 cm Bu¨chner funnel using Whatman No. 40
filter paper. Evaporation of the filtrate was performed with
a tared 2 L round-bottom flask at 50 °C. The dry residue was
diluted with methanol to produce a 3% (w/v) solution.
Separation of 3-Amino and 5-Amino ANOT Isomers Using
Low-Pressure Chromatography. Isolation of crude ANOT was
carried out with a 48 mm i.d. × 30 cm glass column (Kontes
Chromaflex) filled with 11 cm of dry alumina (Acros, neutral,
activated, 50-200 µm). The column was part of a low-pressure
liquid chromatography system that consisted of a Waters
M6000-A isocratic pump, a Gilson model 115 UV detector, and
a Gilson FC 203B fraction collector.
The 3% solution of crude ANOT in methanol was filtered
prior to application to the column. A Rheodyne type 50 valve
equipped with a 1.0 mL Teflon sample loop was used. The
column was washed with ∼850 mL of the dry column mobile
phase prior to use. The ANOT component eluted between 45
and 85 min. After the elution of ANOT, the mobile phase was
changed to methanol to elute the 5-ANOT isomer. This isomer
eluted between 100 and 150 min. The multiple ANOT frac-
tions collected were evaporated to a dry residue under a stream
of compressed air while standing on a heating pad under a
hot lamp. The collected residues at this point typically
exhibited a relative ANOT peak area of >98% and were
combined with other residues of equal or greater purity for
further processing.
Final Purification of ANOT Using Ion Exchange Chroma-
tography. On the basis of a purification scheme found in the
literature (Thiegs et al., 1961), a 113.5 mg sample of ANOT
isolated from the low-pressure chromatography procedure was
dissolved in 4.00 mL of 80% aqueous ethanol (v/v) and
quantitatively transferred to a 10 mm i.d. × 30.5 cm length
chromatographic column containing a 6 cm length of wet
Dowex 50W-X8 H+ resin. The Dowex resin bed was covered
at the top by a 1 cm layer of purified sand. Slight air pressure
was needed to elute the components at this desired flow rate
(1 drop/5 s). The remainder of the 30.5 cm column was
carefully filled with 80% ethanol without disturbing the top
of the resin bed.
Fraction I (11 mL) was very light yellow in color and did
not contain ANOT. Fraction II (49 mL) was a considerably
deeper yellow than either fraction I or the very light yellow
fraction III (141 mL). Fractions II and III contained ANOT
and were combined. LC analysis of samples from continued
elution with 80% ethanol confirmed the absence of ANOT. The
recovered ANOT was found to be 99% pure, based on peak
area.
F igu r e 1. Reduction of zoalene to ANOT.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Syn th esis of ANOT Mixtu r e. ANOT was synthesized
from the chemical reduction of zoalene (Alpharma, Chicago
Heights, IL). The starting material (1.41 g, 6.25 mM) was
weighed into a 500 mL four-neck flask equipped with an
efficient overhead stirrer (furnished with a water-cooled stirrer
gland), thermometer, and Hopkins condenser. After the
apparatus had been thoroughly purged with nitrogen, 190 mL
of anhydrous 3A ethanol was added to the flask. The mixture
was stirred at room temperature until total dissolution oc-
curred. A small aliquot was removed to monitor the progress
of the reaction. After 3.33 g of 10% Pd on carbon (Aldrich)
was added to the flask, the apparatus was again purged with
nitrogen.
The reaction was sampled using a 50 mL pear-shaped
separatory funnel that was connected to a peristaltic pump
by means of C-Flex tubing. Initially, 50.0 mL of a 3.88% (v/v)
cyclohexene solution in 3A ethanol was pipetted into the
separatory funnel. The temperature of this apparatus was
maintained at 51 ( 1 °C.
The reduction of zoalene started with the addition of 50.0
mL of the cyclohexene solution at a nominal rate of 0.05 mL/
min. This initial cyclohexene addition is time zero for the
reaction. The progress of the reaction was monitored at
designated time intervals by removing six drops of sample.
This aliquot was diluted with 500 µL of LC mobile phase and
filtered prior to injection with a 0.2 µL Teflon syringe filter.
The reaction appeared to follow first-order kinetics; samples
after 13 h show the absence of zoalene. To determine the
actual rate of cyclohexene addition, the addition of the cyclo-
hexene solution was continued until all of the 50.0 mL of
solution was added. This addition was completed in 13.5 h.
Therefore, the actual rate of cyclohexene solution addition was
0.062 mL/min (equivalent to the addition of 2.4 µL of cyclo-
hexene/min).
At the point of completion, the reaction mixture was filtered
through a fine glass fritted funnel and the 10% Pd on carbon
was washed thoroughly with anhydrous 3A ethanol. The
reaction mixture was evaporated to a moist residue using a
Rotovapor under reduced pressure and a temperature setting
of 50 °C. The reaction mixture was quantitatively transferred
to a recovery flask using methanol. The residue was further
evaporated to dryness with the aid of a Rotovapor under the
final reduced pressure of 3 mmHg and at 50 °C to give a crude
residue weighing 1.37g.
The ANOT-containing fractions were evaporated under the
house vacuum (19 in Hg gauge pressure) using a temperature
of 50 °C. The resulting residue was recrystallized from 1.9
mL of 190 proof ethanol. The wet crystals were washed with
cold 190 proof ethanol. The recovered ANOT crystals were
dried using an Abderholden drying pistol at the boiling point
of methyl ethyl ketone and at a reduced pressure of 3.5 mmHg.
The crystals were dried for 1 h at 3.5 mmHg. Using this
procedure, 37.8 mg of chromatographically pure ANOT was
recovered.
LC An a lysis of ANOT. The progress of the reaction was
monitored using an LC method for the separation of ANOT,
5-ANOT, and zoalene (Morawski and Kyle, 1984; Parks, 1985).
The system consisted of a Waters model 6000A isocratic pump
and model 490E UV detector, a Wescan model 728 autoinjector
configured with a 20 µL fixed volume injection loop, and a
Hewlett-Packard Chromjet integrator. Using a Kromasil C8,
5 µm column (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA), the separation was
optimized using a 15% (v/v) acetonitrile in water mobile phase
Isola tion of ANOT. Isolation of ANOT from the crude
synthesis product was a three-step process: (1) removal of side
reaction products; (2) isolation of crude ANOT; and (3) final
purification of crude ANOT.
Removal of Side Reaction Products Using Dry Column
Chromatography. Dry column tubing (32 mm diameter,
Kontes Chromaflex) was sealed at one end by stapling and
tightly packing with dry untreated silica gel (J . T. Baker 40
µm flash chromatography packing) to a height of ∼25 in. To
the top of the column was applied 1 in. of diatomaceous earth
(Fisher Scientific Celite 545) and 1 in. of chromatography sand.
A 1.8 g mass of crude dry product in 10 mL of methanol was