3984
G. Smith et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 16 (2006) 3981–3984
Table 4. In vitro and in vivo assessment of CNS penetration for key
compounds
2. Bergeron, R.; Meyer, T. M.; Coyle, J. T.; Greene, R. W.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95, 15730.
3. Tsai, G.; Coyle, J. T. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol.
2002, 42, 165.
Compound Caco-2 Papp Transport ratio (b-a/a-b) B/P Mice
(·10À6 cm/s)
´
´
4. Araragon, C.; Lopez-Corcuera, B. Trends Pharmacol. Sci.
1
38
40
33.4
25.1
26.3
0.8
2.2
2.9
0.54
0.17
0.09
2005, 26, 283.
5. Hashimoto, K. Recent Patents on CNS Drug Discovery
2006, 1, 43.
6. Lechner, S. M. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2006, 6, 75.
7. Smith, G.; Ruhland, T.; Mikkelsen, G.; Andersen, K.;
Christoffersen, C. T.; Alifrangis, L. H.; Mørk, A.; Wren,
P.; Harris, N.; Wyman, B. M.; Brandt, G. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 4027.
(basal–apical(b-a)/apical–basal(a-b)) of >2 in Caco-2
cells pointed towards a possible involvement of active ef-
flux from the brain.
8. Atkinson, B. N.; Bell, S. C.; De Vivo, M.; Kowalski, L. R.;
Lechner, S. M.; Ognyanov, V. I.; Tham, C.-S.; Tsai, C.;
Jia, J.; Ashton, D.; Klitenick, M. A. Mol. Pharmacol.
2001, 60, 1414.
9. Brown, A.; Carlyle, I.; Clark, J.; Hamilton, W.; Gibson,
S.; McGarry, G.; McEachen, S.; Rae, D.; Thorn, S.;
Walker, G. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2001, 11, 2007.
10. Samoshin, V. V.; Kudryavstev, K. V. Tetrahedron Lett.
1994, 34, 7413.
11. Preparation of noncommercially available starting mate-
rials 10b was as follows: 5-chloro-2-iodo-anisole/5-bro-
mo-2-iodo-anisole were prepared from the respective
anilines using the Sandmeyer reaction employing (1)
NaNO2/H2SO4/H2O, 5–10 ꢁC, 30 min; (2) KI, rt, 1 h.
3-Chloro-2-iodo-anisole was prepared by treatment of
3-chloro-anisole with s-BuLi (1.3 M in cyclohexane)/
THF, À95 ꢁC , 1 h followed by addition of I2, 16 h, rt.
4-Bromo-2-iodo-anisole was prepared by treatment of
4-bromo-anisole with PhI(OAc)2, I2, CH3CN, N2, 16 h.
12. Lennernas, H. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1997, 49, 627.
13. Compounds were dosed at 5 mg/kg sc and plasma
and brain samples were taken after 70 min. Brains
were collected by cervical dislocation, homogenised
1:4 (w/w) with 50% acetonitrile/water solution using
an Ultraturrax homogenizer. The supernatant was
separated by centrifugation (2000g, 10 min). Plasma
and extracted brain supernatant were analysed by
LC–MS/MS.
As such, compounds 38 and 40 could thus be substrates
for active efflux transporters such as P-glycoprotein.
These in vitro data appeared to be predictive of in vivo
brain exposure where modest exposure in the CNS was
observed. Thus, 70 min following sc administration of
5 mg/kg, 38 and 40 displayed average brain exposures of
only 60 and 63 ng/ml, compared to plasma levels of 381
and 723 ng/ml for the two compounds (n = 2). This result-
ed in B/P ratios of 0.17 and 0.09 for 38 and 40,
respectively.
In summary, further optimisation of the 2-phenylsulfa-
nylphenyl piperazine acetic acid series leads to the
identification of the S-proline derivatives 38 and 40
with improved in vitro potency in blocking the GlyT-
1. In vitro and in vivo assessment of these compounds
showed that CNS utility of these compounds might be
diminished due to active efflux transporter activity rel-
ative to 1.
References and notes
´ ´
1. Aragon, C.; Lopez-Corcuera, B. Eur.J. Pharmacol. 2003,
479, 249.