ated and provided allylic amides in high yield and excellent
diastereoselectivity (entries 2-4, Table 1). We propose the
four-membered chelate model 16 to account for the observed
selectivity, in analogy to additions of alkenylalanes derived
from alkyne carboaluminations.13 The mild and efficient
conditions for generating N-tert-butanesulfinyl imines coupled
with the rapid, stereoselective, and functional group tolerant
method of alkenylalane addition described herein provide
an attractive strategy for allylic amine synthesis.17
bearing the tert-butanesulfinyl protecting group; however,
epoxidation of this species also oxidized the sulfur to
generate the Bus protecting group18 that could not be
removed even under forcing conditions.
At this stage, conditions had to be identified to stereo-
selectively epoxidize the alkene 5 and effect the intra-
molecular cyclization of the tert-butylcarbamate to form
oxazolidinone 21.19 Prior studies by Roush20a and O’Brien20b
have demonstrated the feasibility of this sequence, although
Roush employed trichloroacetamides and O’Brien focused
on cyclic allylic amides.20c
An extension of this method toward the synthesis of
monoBoc-protected allylic amide 19 and bisBoc-protected
allylic amide 5 was straightforward. Hydrozirconation of
1-hexadecyne to generate alkenylzirconocene 17, followed
by the aluminum transmetalation/imine addition and conve-
nient in situ deprotection of the labile sulfinyl protecting
group with aqueous HCl afforded the desired allylic amine
in 72% yield (Scheme 3). A two step N-Boc-protection
Initial trials used MCPBA as the epoxidizing agent, under
variable temperature and solvent conditions. The best result
could be obtained at 0 °C in CH2Cl2 to yield 85% of 21 as
a 1.6:1 mixture of diastereomers (entry 1, Table 2). In situ
Table 2. Evaluation of Oxidation Conditions to Generate
Epoxide Intermediate 20 Followed by Intramolecular Opening of
the Epoxide to Form Carbamate 21
Scheme 3. Alkenylalane Addition/Deprotection/Boc-Protection
Sequence to Intermediate 5
entry
substrate
conditions
yield [%], dra
1
2
5
5
MCPBA, 0 °C
oxone, NaHCO3,
acetone, rt
85, 1.6:1
trace
3
4
5
TFAA, UHP, -20 °C,
Na2HPO4
TFAA, UHP, -20 °C,
Na2HPO4
93, 9:1
50, ND
19
aYields refer to isolated, pure products. Diastereoselectivity was deter-
mined by HPLC analysis of the crude reaction mixtures.
proved to be higher yielding than the one step approach. Our
original strategy involved epoxidation of the allylic amide
generated dimethyldioxirane (DMDO) was ineffective, pro-
ducing no conversion after 20 h at room temperature.
Increasing the electrophilicity of peracids has been shown
to increase selectivity in directed epoxidations.21 Trifluo-
roperacetic acid, generated in situ from trifluoroacetic acid
(10) For a review, see Ellman, J. A.; Owens, T. D.; Tang, T. P. Acc.
Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 984.
(11) For reviews, see (a) Wipf, P.; Jahn, H. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 12853.
(b) Wipf, P.; Kendall, C. Top. Organomet. Chem. 2005, 8, 1.
(12) (a) Wipf, P.; Kendall, C.; Stephenson, C. R. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2001, 123, 5122. (b) Wipf, P.; Kendall, C.; Stephenson, C. R. J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 761.
(13) Wipf, P.; Nunes, R. L.; Ribe, S. HelV. Chim. Acta 2002, 85, 3478.
(14) Although first demonstrated by Schwartz and Carr in 1977 with
AlCl3,15 hydrozirconation/transmetalation to aluminum has not been explored
further for addition to electrophiles.
(15) Carr, D. B.; Schwartz, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 638.
(16) The quality of Me3Al is of critical importance in this reaction.
Commercial solutions of Me3Al were ineffective, possibly because of
aggregate formation or traces of metal oxides; neat Me3Al that was freshly
diluted with CH2Cl2 was used in all cases.
(18) Sun, P.; Weinreb, S. M.; Shang, M. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 8604.
(19) Wipf, P.; Lim, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 558.
(20) (a) Roush, W. R.; Straub, J. A.; Brown, R. J. J. Org. Chem. 1987,
52, 5127. (b) O’Brien, P.; Childs, A. C.; Ensor, G. J.; Hill, C. L.; Kirby, J.
P.; Dearden, M. J.; Oxenford, S. J.; Rosser, C. M. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4955.
(c) Although frequently observed as a side reaction, this sequence is rarely
employed for anti-diol synthesis.
(21) (a) Jensen, A. J.; Luthman, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 3213.
(b) Fehr, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1998, 37, 2407. (c) Lee, K. W.;
Hwang, S. Y.; Kim, C. R.; Nam, D. H.; Chang, J. H.; Choi, S. C.; Choi, B.
S.; Choi, H.-W.; Lee, K. K.; So, B.; Cho, S. W.; Shin, H. Org. Process
Res. DeV. 2003, 7, 839.
(17) For a review, see Johannsen, M.; Jørgensen, K. A. Chem. ReV. 1998,
98, 1689.
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 15, 2006
3377