2-(4-pentenyl)indole (1) with a catalytic amount of PtCl2 (2
mol %) in dioxane that contained a trace of HCl (5 mol %)
at 60 °C for 24 h led to isolation of tetrahydrocarbazole 2 in
92% yield (eq 1). The efficiency and stereoselectivity of
Pt(II)-catalyzed hydroarylation pointed to the potential
development of an analogous asymmetric hydroarylation
protocol. Indeed, here we report the platinum-catalyzed
asymmetric intramolecular hydroarylation of unactivated
alkenes with indoles.12
Table 1. Effect of Ligand and Solvent on the
Platinum-Catalyzed Asymmetric Hydroarylation of 3
We initially targeted the known dicationic platinum dimer
13
[(BINAP)Pt(µ-Cl)]2(OTf)2 as a catalyst for asymmetric
hydroarylation on account of the diverse range of catalytic
asymmetric transformations that employ BINAP as a sup-
porting ligand.14 Although a 1:1 mixture of [(S)-BINAP]PtCl2
and AgOTf was an active catalyst for the intramolecular
hydroarylation of alkenyl indole 3, no significant asymmetric
induction was observed (Table 1, entry 1). However,
subsequent experimentation identified (S)-3,5-t-Bu-4-MeO-
MeOBIPHEP [(S)-4] as an effective ligand for Pt-catalyzed
asymmetric hydroarylation (Table 1). In an optimized
protocol,15 treatment of 3 with a catalytic 1:1 mixture of [(S)-
4]PtCl2 and AgOTf (10 mol %) at 60 °C in methanol for 20
h led to isolation of tetrahydrocarbazole 5 in 93% yield with
90% ee (Table 1, entry 10).16
Several points regarding the optimization of the conversion
of 3 to 5 are worth noting. First, no effort was made to
exclude air or moisture in these experiments. Second, the
enantioselectivity of intramolecular hydroarylation increased
with the increasing steric bulk of the P-bound aryl groups,
in particular, the meta substituents of these aryl groups (Table
1, entries 1-6). This behavior has been observed previously
in the context of asymmetric hydrogenation,17 Heck cou-
pling,18,19 allylic alkylation,18 and allylic amination.20 Third,
a Isolated product g95% purity. b AgOTf (20 mol %) was employed.
c Enantiomeric purity not determined. d AgBF4 (10 mol %) was employed.
the enantioselectivity of the conversion of 3 to 5 increased
with the increasing donicity/polarity of the solvent (Table
1, entries 6-11), although employment of strongly donating
solvents led to a significant decrease in reaction rate (Table
1, entry 7).15 Fourth, although the nature of the silver source
had no significant effect on the reaction (Table 1, entries 10
and 11),15 the Pt/Ag ratio was important. In particular,
employment of a 1:2 ratio of Pt/Ag led to a significant
decrease in both the yield and the enantioselectivity of
hydroarylation (Table 1, entries 3 and 4). This observation
suggests that monomeric dicationic platinum complexes are
not effective catalysts for asymmetric hydroarylation.13
Asymmetric hydroarylation of 2-alkenyl indoles catalyzed
by a 1:1 mixture of [(S)-4]PtCl2 and AgOTf tolerated either
an N-benzyl or an N-allyl group and either an electron-
donating or an electron-withdrawing group on the indole
moiety (Table 2, entries 1-4). The protocol tolerated
heteroatom and alkyl substitution at the C(1) or C(2) position
of the 4-pentyl chain, although the bis(pivaloate)-substituted
indole 6 cyclized with low enantioselectivity (Table 2, entries
5-9). Similarly, 2-(1,1-dimethyl-4-pentenyl)indole cyclized
(10) (a) Han, X.; Widenhoefer, R. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45,
1747. (b) Bender, C. F.; Widenhoefer, R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
1070. (c) Wang, X.; Widenhoefer, R. A. Organometallics 2004, 23, 1649.
(d) Qian, H.; Widenhoefer, R. A. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 2635.
(11) Qian, H.; Han, X.; Widenhoefer, R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 9536.
(12) A preliminary result in this area has been described9 but was
unfortunately reported incorrectly. See: Liu, C.; Han, X.; Wang, X.;
Widenhoefer, R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 10493.
(13) Pignat, K.; Vallotto, J.; Pinna, F.; Strukul, G. Organometallics 2000,
19, 5160.
(14) (a) Noyori, R. Asymmetric Catalysis in Organic Synthesis; Wiley:
New York, 1994. (b) Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis, 2nd ed.; Ojima, I.,
Ed.; Wiley-VCH: New York, 2000.
(15) See the Supporting Information for a more detailed description of
the optimization studies.
(17) (a) RajanBabu, T. V.; Ayers, T. A.; Casalnuovo, A. L. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1994, 116, 4101. (b) Schmid, R.; Broger, E. A.; Cereghetti, M.;
Crameri, Y.; Foricher, J.; Lalonde, M.; Mu¨ller, R. K.; Scalone, M.; Schoettel,
G.; Zutter, U. Pure Appl. Chem. 1996, 68, 131. (c) Blaser, H.-U.; Buser,
H.-P.; Jalett, H.-P.; Pugin, B.; Spindler, F. Synlett 1999, 867.
(18) Trabesinger, G.; Albinati, A.; Feiken, N.; Kunz, R. W.; Pregosin,
P. S.; Tschoerner, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 6315.
(19) Tschoerner, M.; Pregosin, P. S. Organometallics 1999, 18, 670.
(20) (a) Selvakumar, K.; Valentini, M.; Pregosin, P. S. Organometallics
2000, 19, 1299. (b) Faller, J. W.; Wilt, J. C. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 633.
(16) Two control experiments ruled out the possibility of acid- or silver-
catalyzed asymmetric hydroarylation. In one experiment, a solution of 3
that contained a catalytic mixture of (S)-4 (10 mol %), HCl (10 mol %),
and HOTf (10 mol %) in methanol was heated at 60 °C for 24 h. GC analysis
of the crude reaction mixture revealed no consumption of 3. In a second
experiment, a solution of 3 and a catalytic mixture of (S)-4 (10 mol %) and
AgOTf (5 mol %) in methanol was heated at 60 °C for 24 h. GC analysis
of the crude reaction mixture again revealed no consumption of 3.
3802
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 17, 2006