We have been interested in preparing several of the 2,11-
cyclized cembranoids by total synthesis. For those targets
lacking stereocenters at C7 and/or C8, we have pursued a
cycloaldol approach.10 Our approach to a cladiellene triol,
which possesses a 3° alcohol stereocenter at C7, employs
the Ireland-Claisen rearrangement.11 We felt that the re-
arrangement could be productively employed both to estab-
lish the stereochemistry at C7 and to provide a functional
handle for formation of the tetrahydrofuran ring via the C9-
C10 alkene.
Taylor,16 and Dieter17 suggested that such a transformation
would be plausible.18 The success of this approach was
predicated on an initial syn-selective SN2′ reaction of allylic
chloride 3 to lactone 4.19 In the event, a Ag-mediated SN2′
cyclization proceeded in a syn fashion to afford the corre-
sponding lactone in an 8:1 dr favoring â isomer 4. To our
satisfaction, Cu-mediated anti SN2′ reaction of an alkoxy-
methyl nucleophile proceeded in excellent yield on scale to
afford a single stereoisomeric product. Zn(II) salts (ZnCl2
or ZnBr2) proved to be critical to the success of the
transformation; no substitution occurred in the absence of
the Zn salt.20
At this stage in the synthesis, we hoped to close the
tetrahydrofuran ring via an electrophilic cyclization of the
C2 hydroxy group onto the C9-C10 alkene. The isopropenyl
alkene was hydrogenated to avoid competing cyclizations
to give diene 6 after cleavage of the MOM protecting group
(Scheme 2). Although the electrophilic cyclization approach
Treatment of ester 2 (available in three steps from (S)-
(+)-carvone)12 with KHMDS and TIPSOTf afforded a single
stereoisomeric product 3 possessing the Z-alkene and the (S)-
stereochemistry at C7 (Scheme 1). The Ireland-Claisen
Scheme 1
Scheme 2
rearrangement presumably proceeded via a chairlike transi-
tion state analogous to conformer i, with the larger C11
substituent occupying the pseudoequatorial position. The
stereochemistry of the chlorine atom at C1 was critical to
the success of the Claisen rearrangement. Because the
chlorine atom is situated in a pseudoaxial position with
respect to the cyclohexene ring, the effective steric bulk of
the C1 carbon was smaller than that of the methyl-substituted
C11 carbon.13
met with some limited success when ICl was employed, the
yields proved to be too low to be synthetically useful. Other
electrophilic reagents (Br2, I2, Pb(OAc)4/ZnBr2, NBS,
Hg(O2CCF3)2, etc.) gave poor yields and/or undesired side
products.
We next considered reversing the sense of ring closure so
that the C2-O bond would be established in the tetra-
hydrofuran ring-forming step rather than the C9-O bond.
To this end, Swern oxidation of alcohol 6 and Horner-
Wadsworth-Emmons Wittig reaction afforded E-sulfone 7.
Sharpless dihydroxylation of triene 7 gave C11-C12 R-diol
8.
With the success of the Ireland-Claisen rearrangement,
15 of the 20 carbons of the carbon framework were in place.
It was at this point that we chose to install the C1-C2 bond.
Rather than attempting a direct displacement of the â-Cl
substituent, we sought to employ a Cu-mediated SN2′ ring
opening of the allylic lactone using an alkoxy Cu nucleo-
phile.14 SN2′ reactions of alkoxyalkyl Cu nucleophiles are
not well precedented, although earlier work by Fuchs,15
(16) Papillon, J. P. N.; Taylor, R. J. K. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 119-122.
(17) Dieter, R. K.; Watson, R. T.; Goswami, R. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 253-
256.
(18) See also: Falck, J. R.; Bhatt, R. K.; Ye, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995,
117, 5973-5982.
(19) For a review, see: Paquette, L. A.; Stirling, C. J. M. Tetrahedron
1992, 48, 7383-7423.
(20) Nakamura, E.; Sekiya, K.; Arai, M.; Aoki, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1989, 111, 3091-3093. Calaza, M. I.; Hupe, E.; Knochel, P. Org. Lett.
2003, 5, 1059-1061. For a review, see: Knochel, P.; Calaza, M. I.; Hupe,
E. Carbon-Carbon Bond-Forming Reactions Mediated by Organozinc
Reagents. In Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions, 2nd ed.; de
Meijere, A., Diederich, F., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2004; Vol. 2, pp
619-670.
(10) (a) Chai, Y.; Vicic, D. A.; McIntosh, M. C. Org. Lett. 2003, 5,
1039-1042. (b) Chai, Y.; McIntosh, M. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45,
3269-3272.
(11) Hong, S.-P.; Lindsay, H. A.; Yaramasu, T.; Zhang, X.; McIntosh,
M. C. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 2042-2055.
(12) Lindsay, H. A.; Salisbury, C. L.; Cordes, W.; McIntosh, M. Org.
Lett. 2001, 3, 4007-4010.
(13) McFarland, C.; Hutchison, J. M.; McIntosh, M. C. Org. Lett. 2005,
7, 3641-3644.
(14) Trost, B. M.; Klun, T. P. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 4256-4257.
(15) Hutchinson, D. K.; Fuchs, P. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 4930-
4939.
3664
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 17, 2006