Massick et al.
sociation of a ligand L from the acyl complex A (eq 2)
and substituted cobalt carbonyl catalysts.11 A key step is the
migratory insertion of a CO into a Co-R bond (eq 3).
R-Co(CO)3L + CO f RC(O)Co(CO)3L
(3)
Described in the present paper are time-resolved spectro-
scopic investigations of the modified cobalt carbonyl com-
plexes RC(O)Co(CO)3(PR′3), where R is CH3, CD3, or Et
and PR′3 is PPh3 or P(nBu)3. The goal of the present study
was to survey the possible effects of changing the alkyl group
or the phosphine modifier on the reaction dynamics of the
intermediate I. One concern was the possible role of agostic
bonding between alkyl group C-H(D) bonds and Co in
stabilizing I. In addition P(nBu)3 is a closer approximation
(than is PPh3) to the trialkylphosphines used in the modified
cobalt carbonylation catalysts.2 These studies were carried
out using a high-pressure variable-temperature (HP/VT) flow
cell reactor7c to examine the reactivity of I under a wide
range of CO partial pressures (PCO) and temperatures in a
manner that allows the accurate determination of activation
parameters for the competitive decay steps.
prepares a reactive intermediate I with the same composition
as that proposed for the thermal reaction intermediate. Time-
resolved spectroscopic studies are used to interrogate the
nature of I as well as the dynamics of the reactions to give
the stable acyl products and of reverse alkyl migration to
give the metal alkyl complex M. The resulting time-resolved
optical (TRO) and time-resolved infrared (TRIR) spectra
under various conditions are then interpreted in terms of
potential mechanisms. For example, in this manner we have
probed the model systems Mn(CO)5(C(O)R) and CpFe(CO)2-
(C(O)R) (Cp ) η5-C5H5).6,7 Described here is an extension
of our recent study of cobalt systems8 related to the
phosphine-modified cobalt carbonyl catalysts used in certain
industrial hydroformylation processes.2
Experimental Section
Phosphine-modified cobalt carbonyl catalysts used for
carbonylation of higher olefins have more favorable linear-
to-branched selectivity but require higher temperatures than
do catalysts based on the simple cobalt carbonyls.2 The
former also have greater tolerance of feedstock impurities
and better thermal stability than do rhodium catalysts now
predominant for propene hydroformylation. As a conse-
quence, there is continuing interest in new applications of
cobalt carbonyls as carbonylation catalysts.9 Pioneering
mechanistic studies by Heck and Breslow10 of cobalt
carbonyl catalyzed hydroformylation of alkenes led to the
proposed catalytic cycle that has been the starting point for
quantitative reaction mechanism studies with unsubstituted
Materials. All syntheses were carried out on a vacuum line using
Schlenk and cannula techniques or in an inert atmosphere box under
argon. The argon used in the vacuum line was dried and deoxy-
genated by passage over columns of activated molecular sieves and
an oxygen scavenger (Phillips catalyst on silica). Dicobalt octac-
arbonyl was purchased from Strem Chemicals, and the phosphines
PPh3 and P(nBu)3 and acid chlorides CD3C(O)Cl and C2H5C(O)Cl
were purchased from Aldrich. All solvents were from Fischer
Chemicals and dried by refluxing with sodium and distilling under
a N2 atmosphere.12 Research grade carbon monoxide gas (99.995%
purity from Spectra Gases) was used without further purification.
Syntheses. The phosphine-modified acylcobalt carbonyl com-
plexes RC(O)Co(CO)3(PR′3) (A) used in the flash photolysis studies
were prepared from Co2(CO)8 in overall yields near 50% according
to published methods.13 The products were characterized by NMR
and FTIR spectroscopy.
Solutions for TRIR Experiments. The calculated amounts of
cobalt complex were transferred into a Schlenk-type flask in the
drybox, where they were stored. Following evacuation for a few
minutes to remove residual solvents or gases, the desired solvent
was added using a cannula. Prior to that, the solvent was dried and
distilled under argon and afterward degassed either by the freeze-
pump-thaw (f-p-t) technique or simply by repeated evacuation.
The solution concentration was generally about 3 mM. With a path
length of 0.5 mm, this gave an optical absorbance at the 355 nm
(4) (a) Mawby, R. J.; Basolo, F.; Pearson, R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964,
86, 3994-3999. (b) Calderazzo, F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1977,
16, 299-311. (c) Cawse, J. N.; Fiato, R. A.; Pruett, R. L. J. Organomet.
Chem. 1979, 172, 405-413. (d) Flood, T. C. Top. Stereochem. 1981,
12, 37-118. (e) Webb, S.; Giandomenico, C.; Halpern, J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1986, 108, 345-347. (f) Cavell, K. J. Coord. Chem. ReV. 1996,
155, 209-243.
(5) Jordon, R. B. Reaction Mechanisms of Inorganic and Organometallic
Systems, 2nd ed.; Oxford University Press: New York, 1998.
(6) (a) Belt, S. T.; Ryba, D. W.; Ford, P. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991,
113, 9524-9528. (b) Boese, W. T.; Lee, B. L.; Ryba, D. W.; Belt, S.
T.; Ford, P. C. Organometallics 1993, 12, 4739-4741. (c) Boese, W.
T.; Ford, P. C. Organometallics 1994, 13, 3525-3531. (d) Boese, W.
T.; Ford, P. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 8381-8391.
(7) (a) McFarlane, K. L.; Ford, P. C. Organometallics 1998, 17, 1166-
1168. (b) McFarlane, K. L.; Lee, B.; Fu, W. F.; van Eldik, R.; Ford,
P. C. Organometallics 1998, 17, 1826-1834. (c) Massick, S. M.; Ford,
P. C. Organometallics 1999, 18, 4362-4366.
(11) (a) Martin, J. T.; Baird, M. C. Organometallics 1983, 2, 1073-1078.
(b) Kovacs, I.; F. Ungvary; Marko, L. Organometallics 1986, 5, 209-
215. (c) Roe, D. C. Organometallics 1987, 6, 942-946. (d) Pino, P.;
Major, A.; Spindler, F.; Tannenbaum, R.; Bor, G.; Horvath, I. T. J.
Organomet. Chem. 1991, 417, 65-76. (e) Borovikov, M. S.; Kovacs,
I.; Ungvary, F.; Sisak, A.; Marko, L. Organometallics 1992, 11, 1576-
1579. (f) Bartik, T.; Krummling, T.; Happ, B.; Sieker, A.; Marko, L.;
Boese, R.; Ugo, R.; Zucchi, C.; Palyi, G. Catal. Lett. 1993, 19, 383-
389. (g) Klingler, R. J.; Rathke, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116,
4772-4785. (h) Rathke, J. W.; Klinger, R. J., II; R. E. G.; Kramarz,
K. W.; Woelk, K. Prog. NMR Spectrosc. 1997, 30, 209-253.
(12) Riddick, J. A.; Bunger, W. B.; Sakano, T. K. Organic SolVents Physical
Properties and Methods of Purification, 4th ed.; John Wiley & Sons:
New York, 1986; Vol. II.
(8) Massick, S.; Rabor, J.; Elbers, S.; Marhenke, J.; Bernhard, S.;
Schoonover, J.; Ford, P. C. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39, 3098-3106.
(9) (a) Rathke, J. W.; Klinger, R. J.; Krause, T. R. Organometallics 1991,
10, 1350-1355. (b) Knifton, J. F.; Lin, J. J. J. Mol. Catal. 1993, 81,
27-36. (c) Piotti, M. E.; Alper, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118,
111-116. (d) Kramarz, K. W.; Klingler, R. J.; Fremgen, D. E.; Rathke,
J. W. Catal. Today 1999, 49, 339-352. (e) Miguel, S.; Zeigler, T.
Organometallics 1996, 15, 2611 and references therein. (f) Rossi. L.,
Piacenti, F. Bianchi, M.; Frediani, P.; Salvini, A. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.
1999, 67-68. (g) Goh, S. K.; Marynick, D. S. Organometallics 2002,
22, 2262-2267. (h) Allmendinger, M., Eberhardt, R.; Luinstra, G.;
Reiger, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 5646-5647.
(13) Lindner, E.; Zipper, M. Chem. Ber. 1974, 107, 1444-1455. (b) Roe,
(10) Heck, R. F.; Breslow, D. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1962, 84, 2499-2502.
D. C. Organometallics 1987, 6, 942-946.
576 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 42, No. 2, 2003