3
˚
˚
rhombohedral, a = 43.22(4), c = 43.40(4) A, V = 70187(121) A , space
group R3, Z = 3, m = 0.532 mm21, 97012 reflections measured, 36570
unique which were used in all calculations (Friedel pairs were not merged),
3123 parameters, 4280 restraints. The final R1 (I . 2s(I)) = 0.1437, and
wR2 = 0.4079 for all data. CCDC 268806.
similar cube-like octameric structure was constructed even in the
crystal 1b with lower ion content. In sharp contrast to 1a, the
hydrogen bond network between the carboxyl groups compen-
sated for the loss of interaction with the potassium ion in the
crystal 1b. These results show that coordination of amides to
potassium ion is preferred over that of carboxylic acids despite the
attractive ion–ion interaction. The self-assembled nano-cages
stimulate our imagination for the design of new supramolecules
as well as their application. Further study is in progress.
The synchrotron radiation experiments were performed at the
BL38B1 in the SPring-8 with the approval of the Japan
Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute (JASRI) (Proposal
No. 2005A0258-NL1-np).
1 (a) M. M. Conn and J. Rebek, Jr., Chem. Rev., 1997, 97, 1647–1668; (b)
A. Jasat and J. C. Sherman, Chem. Rev., 1999, 99, 931–967; (c)
R. Warmuth and J. Yoon, Acc. Chem. Res., 2001, 34, 95–105.
2 (a) D. J. Cram, M. E. Tanner and R. Thomas, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl., 1991, 30, 1024–1027; (b) P. Roach and R. Warmuth, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 3039–3042; (c) M. Yoshizawa, K. Kumazawa
and M. Fujita, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 13456–13457.
3 (a) S. Tashiro, M. Tominaga, M. Kawano, B. Therrien, T. Ozeki and
M. Fujita, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 4546–4547; (b) J. M. C. A.
Kerckhoffs, M. G. J. ten Cate, M. A. Mateos-Timoneda, F. W. B. van
Leeuwen, B. Snellink-Rue¨l, A. L. Spek, H. Kooijman, M. Crego-
Calama and D. N. Reinhoudt, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127,
12697–12708.
Notes and references
4 D. Fiedler, R. G. Bergman and K. N. Raymond, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2004, 43, 6748–6751.
{ Preparation of 1a and 1b: potassium carbonate (2.2 mg, 16.1 mmol) was
added to a solution of 2 (20 mg, 10.7 mmol) in MeOH (5 mL). After the
solution was refluxed for 40 min, the solvent was evaporated to give 1a as a
colorless powder. 1b was also prepared using 2 (30 mg, 16.1 mmol) and
0.5 equiv. of potassium carbonate (1.1 mg, 8.0 mmol) by the same
procedure as that described for 1a. Crystals for X-ray analysis were
obtained from aqueous MeOH. The mass spectroscopic data showed that
1a exists as a mixture of monopotassium (A), dipotassium (B), and
tripotassium (C) salts: MS (FAB): m/z 1907 ([A + H]+, calcd 1907), 1944
([B + H]+, calcd 1945), 1983 ([C + H]+, calcd 1983). 1b also exists as a
mixture of the neutral molecule (2) and the monopotassium salt: MS
(FAB): m/z 1891 ([2 + Na]+, calcd 1891), 1907 ([A + H]+, calcd 1907).
§ X-Ray crystallographic analysis of 1a and 1b: diffraction data sets of the
crystal of 1a were collected on a beamline BL38B1 at SPring-8 (Hyogo,
Japan), and those of 1b were collected on a beamline BL-6A at the Photon
Factory (Tsukuba, Japan) using a Quantum 4R CCD X-ray detector (Area
Detector Systems Corporation, California, USA). The crystals were
cryoprotected with glycerol in a nitrogen stream at 95 K. Four X-ray
wavelengths—peak (a peak of the K edge of bromine), inflection (an
inflection point of the K edge), low-energy remote (a remote point from the
K edge to the low-energy wavelength side), and high-energy remote (a
remote point from the K edge to the high-energy wavelength side)—were
determined by the X-ray absorption spectrum of bromine atoms. X-Ray
diffraction data were collected at the four wavelengths (X-ray diffraction
statistics are included in Table S1 and S2 of the ESI{). Diffraction data
were processed and scaled using the HKL2000 package16 and the CCP4
program package.17 Phasing with the multiwavelength anomalous diffrac-
tion (MAD) method was carried out using SHELXD18 and SHELXE.19
The structural models were built and viewed using TURBO FRODO20 and
PyMOL.21 The structures were refined by full matrix least squares on F2
using SHELXL-9722 with the diffraction data; for these data, X-ray
5 M. Yoshizawa, Y. Takeyama, T. Kusukawa and M. Fujita, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 1347–1349.
6 (a) S. R. Seidel and P. J. Stang, Acc. Chem. Res., 2002, 35, 972–983; (b)
M. Fujita, M. Tominaga, A. Hori and B. Therrien, Acc. Chem. Res.,
2005, 38, 371–380.
7 (a) V. Bo¨hmer, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1995, 34, 713–745; (b)
A. Ikeda and S. Shinkai, Chem. Rev., 1997, 97, 1713–1734.
8 (a) T. Heinz, D. M. Rudkevich and J. Rebek, Jr., Nature, 1998, 394,
764–766; (b) A. M. Rinco´n, P. Prados and J. de Mendoza, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2001, 123, 3493–3498; (c) A. Arduini, R. Ferdani, A. Pochini,
A. Secchi, F. Ugozzoli, G. M. Sheldrick, P. Prados, J. J. Gonza´lez and
J. de Mendoza, J. Supramol. Chem., 2002, 2, 85–88.
9 (a) A. M. Rinco´n, P. Prados and J. de Mendoza, Eur. J. Org. Chem.,
2002, 640–644; (b) F. Sansone, L. Baldini, A. Casnati, E. Chierici,
G. Faimani, F. Ugozzoli and R. Ungaro, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126,
6204–6205.
10 F. Corbellini, L. D. Costanzo, M. Crego-Calama, S. Geremia and
D. N. Reinhoudt, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 9946–9947.
11 L. J. Prins, J. Huskens, F. de Jong, P. Timmerman and D. N. Reinhoudt,
Nature, 1999, 398, 498–502.
12 L. R. MacGillivray and J. L. Atwood, Nature, 1997, 389, 469–472.
13 (a) A. Casnati, P. Minari, A. Pochini and R. Ungaro, J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun., 1991, 1413–1414; (b) R. G. Janssen, W. Verboom,
D. N. Reinhoudt, A. Casnati, M. Freriks, A. Pochini, F. Ugozzoli,
R. Ungaro, P. M. Nieto, M. Carramolino, F. Cuevas, P. Prados and
J. de Mendoza, Synthesis, 1993, 380–386.
14 W. A. Hendrickson, Science, 1991, 254, 51–58.
15 The inner volumes were calculated using PLATON. A. L. Spek, J. Appl.
Crystallogr., 2003, 36, 7–13.
16 Z. Otwinowski and W. Minor, Methods Enzymol., 1997, 276, 307–326.
17 Collaborative Computational Project, Number-4, Acta Crystallogr.,
Sect. D, 1994, 50, 760–763.
˚
˚
wavelengths were 0.7000 A in 1a and 0.9220 A in 1b. The positions of
hydrogen atoms, excepting those of the carboxyl groups and all solvent
molecules, were calculated and refined using the riding model. Non-
hydrogen atoms without solvents were refined by the anisotropic
temperature factor, and hydrogens and solvents were isotropic. Crystal
18 T. R. Schneider and G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D, 2002,
58, 1772–1779.
19 G. M. Sheldrick, Z. Kristallogr., 2002, 644–650.
20 Architecture et Fonction des Macromole´cules Biologiques (AFMB),
CNRS, France.
21 W. L. DeLano, The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, (2002),
DeLano Scientific, San Carlos, CA, USA.
22 G. M. Sheldrick and T. R. Schneider, Methods Enzymol., 1997, 277,
319–343.
data of 1a: 8C102H118.5Br3N3O15?12K?33CH3OH?66H2O, Mr = 17645.6,
3
˚
˚
rhombohedral, a = 43.05(4), c = 44.17(4) A, V = 70897(123) A , space
group R3, Z = 3, m = 1.145 mm21, 60089 reflections measured, 20981
unique which were used in all calculations (Friedel pairs were not merged),
3205 parameters, 4522 restraints. The final R1 (I . 2s(I)) = 0.1347, wR2 =
0.3053 for all data. CCDC 290779. Crystal data of 1b:
8C102H119.25Br3N3O15?6K?21CH3OH?27H2O, Mr
= 16330.0,
3608 | Chem. Commun., 2006, 3606–3608
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2006